- 1. Century 21 or 22 ??? (score: 1)
- Author: anderson@ncrsun1.ncr.usace.army.mil (Kevin Anderson)
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 10:28:53 -0600 (CST)
- Hi gang, I'm new to the Ten Tec list. I joined as I need to replace my only rig (a Heath HW-16 that has lost too many electrolytics I cant't replace), and I am considering a Ten Tec for the quality a
- /archives//html/TenTec/1996-04/msg00004.html (7,639 bytes)
- 2. Century 21 or 22 ??? (score: 1)
- Author: owen@apollo.eeel.nist.gov (James C. Owen, III)
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 13:52:01 -0400 (EDT)
- You won't go wrong with either of them-- however if it was me and I had the money I'd go with the 22. I'm not a Century expert or even an owner but I don't think that the 21 ever had a digital readou
- /archives//html/TenTec/1996-04/msg00005.html (8,088 bytes)
- 3. Century 21 or 22 ??? (score: 1)
- Author: vhatley@usa.pipeline.com (Vernon A. Hatley)
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 08:38:50 -0500
- Kevin, I've been using a C-21 for about a year with great success. There is no cord in the analog C-21; it is all gear driven. So you don't need to worry about that at all. I do have a problem with
- /archives//html/TenTec/1996-04/msg00012.html (8,684 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu