Mail Archive Search: <slopers>

Results:

References: [ slopers: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

181. Topband: 160 Newbie Antenna Advice (score: 2): Author: kn4lf@nrcdxas.org (KN4LF, Thomas Giella); Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:07:52 +0000; Thomas KN4LF Says: I've had very good luck with ground level fed 100 foot slopers with the far ends supported at 33 feet from a non metallic support structure. I've also had good luck with short 290-; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00191.html (6,695 bytes)
182. Topband: shunt feed help needed (score: 2): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 16:02:41 -0700; "I'm hoping someone can help me understand what I'm seeing. Setup is a Rohn 25 tower with 3 yagis -- a short 40 at 105 ft, a C-3E at 97 ft and another C-3E at 69 feet. I tapped the tower at about 30; /archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00040.html (10,019 bytes)
183. Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receiveissues (score: 2): Author: 9a3a@spidernet.com.cy (Ivo PEZER, 5B4ADA); Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 10:27:32 +0100; vertical that I have much better experience with TX/RX low 160m antenna and would like to encourage people to get on the air with whatever available means. Having no other choice for 160 (unable to; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00065.html (8,235 bytes)
184. Topband: Shunt feed vs sloper (score: 2): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:25:45 -0400; Hi Dean, It helps to look at the extremes. At the best extreme is a substantial disc at the top of the tower near 1/4wl in radius, and a 1/4 wl grounded tower. This should produce minimum current in; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00032.html (8,628 bytes)
185. Topband: Shunt feed vs sloper (score: 2): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:44:15 -0400; Modeling shows that this is true -- the Yagi acts like a top That would very much depend on the tower height, and the size of the yagi. The main problem with slopers is they are very dependent on wha; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00026.html (7,814 bytes)
186. Topband: Shunt feed vs sloper (score: 2): Author: n6bv@arrl.org (R. Dean Straw); Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:54:45 -0700; Bill: Concerning quarter-wave slopers: <snip> Plane for Modeling shows that this is true -- the Yagi acts like a top "counterpoise" for the sloping wire. Indeed, removing the tower from the model ess; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00022.html (7,802 bytes)
187. Topband: Shunt feed vs sloper (score: 2): Author: zl3ix@inet.net.nz (Greg - ZL3IX); Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 21:51:56 +1200; My apologies for revisiting this thread, which was discussed briefly last month. I am tempted to try a sloper as the first Topband antenna from my new QTH here in ZL, as it will be quicker to get goi; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00017.html (7,849 bytes)
188. Odp: Topband: Shunt feed vs sloper (score: 2): Author: rtym@ippt.gov.pl (Ryszard Tymkiewicz); Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:48:55 +0200; Hello Greg,All, I agree with Bill that slopers " are very dependent on the individual installation ". I'm using my Half Sloper since 10 years and I was thinking of shunt feeding too,but I'm so satisf; /archives//html/Topband/2001-09/msg00019.html (7,954 bytes)
189. Topband: modeling question (score: 2): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:21:12 -0500; My point is the voltage varies all over the place with the electrical characteristics of the structure. Power can NOT be used to quantify the problem. (100 watts might be excessive power in some cas; /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00148.html (8,560 bytes)
190. Topband: Sloper w/elevated radials....WOW! (score: 2): Author: NX4D@earthlink.net (Doug Waller); Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 14:29:13 -0500; I subscribed to this reflector to learn all I can about Top Band, and have not been disappointed. Living on a 1/2 acre lot, I didnt expect very good results however. To my 60 ft tower with a single m; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00179.html (8,801 bytes)
191. Topband: Ar2 Preamp (score: 2): Author: n2ckh@cybercomm.net (Steve Hajducek); Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 09:14:17 -0400; Hello Barry, I have no experience with them at medium wave, howver my experience with them on VHF/UHF keep them out of consideration for my low band receive antennae. In addition, they do not have th; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00143.html (8,745 bytes)
192. Topband: poor antenna- big dx ? (score: 2): Author: rtym@ippt.gov.pl (Ryszard Tymkiewicz); Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:23:21 +0100; Hello Wolf, First of all I agree with you we in our part of Europe should have antennas as good as possible. Anyway this is not always possible and I suppose its better to use what you are able to h; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00098.html (8,164 bytes)
193. Topband: Fwd: TopBand (score: 2): Author: W7lr@aol.com (W7lr@aol.com); Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 17:22:23 EST; --part1_0.bd01d849.259a921f_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob EL2RF could use some ideas from all the topband talent! Dont know if this will go; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00312.html (9,767 bytes)
194. Topband: 160m sloper problem (score: 2): Author: k8unp@shadow.net (Pete Rimmel N8PR); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:16:26 -0400; Ted, I have used various slopers from 60 ft towers, but not 50 ft towers. However, with the top loading on the tower, I found that the 160 sloper was not resonant with 130 ft. It was longer. You have; /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00122.html (8,516 bytes)
195. Topband: Half sloper. (score: 2): Author: WD8DSB@aol.com (WD8DSB@aol.com); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 17:42:53 EDT; Ted, I had the opposite problem that you had. I put up a 68 foot 1/8 wave half sloper for 160 meters (it is an electrical 1/4 wave with inductive loading at the feed point). You can see my actual ant; /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00119.html (7,330 bytes)
196. Odp: Topband: Rx Antennas (score: 2): Author: rtym@ippt.gov.pl (Ryszard Tymkiewicz); Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 06:57:48 +0200; OK Tom, I know K9AY loops are working in the same way as EWEs do. I suppose the reason EWEs were not working well in my case is that I have small garden 1000 sq.m /30m X 30m/ and a lot of tranmitting; /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00029.html (7,298 bytes)
197. TopBand: E30GA update (score: 2): Author: bernie@dailydx.com (Bernie McClenny, W3UR); Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 21:55:27 +0000; The following comments were sent by e-mail by Bruce, WD4NGB, from the E30GA DXpedition. I am sending this to a bunch of the reflectors to get the word out. I will not be able to forward any requests; /archives//html/Topband/1998-11/msg00050.html (9,025 bytes)
198. TopBand: ZL8RS (score: 2): Author: 100374.252@compuserve.com (J & AJ Robertson); Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 06:16:27 -0400; Bob was on from 0935z 15July but cndx vy poor and his siganls were 25 - 30 db down with me. He leaves the Island at 1830z and is hoping for a quiet trip to catch up sleep. For those who asked me abou; /archives//html/Topband/1998-07/msg00060.html (8,002 bytes)
199. TopBand: Shunt-fed tower (score: 2): Author: ja0dai@ba.mbn.or.jp (S. Watanabe JA0DAI); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 08:00:42 +0900; Hi Alex, I am currently using this combination system of half slopers for 80m and a gamma matched shunt fed tower for 160m. One sloper wire are pulled down toward South-East and another toward North-; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00348.html (7,978 bytes)
200. TopBand: Shunt-fed tower (score: 2): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:40:43 EST; On Thu, 19 Mar 1998 18:28:56 +0000 "Alex C.J. van Eijk" <DXIS@wxs.nl> writes: Alex; my own experience is that any interaction is minimal or unoticed as long as the tower and/or guy wires are not natu; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00307.html (8,260 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]