Mail Archive Search: <slopers>

Results:

References: [ slopers: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

201. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 2): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Fri, 06 Mar 1998 14:51:56 EST; Sounds good Dave. My wire verticals are full size also and hung from the top guys of a 180' tower. They are about 50-60' apart total at the top and 130' apart at 20' above ground with 12 or less elev; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00112.html (17,343 bytes)
202. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 2): Author: Dave_Raymond-CSUS04@email.mot.com (Dave Raymond-CSUS04); Date: Fri, 6 Mar 1998 09:00:43 -0600; I have an elevated vertical (GP) on 160. . . it's hung off of the 120' guy ring of a 130' rotating tower. . . it has about a 35 degree slope to it. It's fed 10' off the ground and has 3 elevated radi; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00106.html (15,066 bytes)
203. TopBand: KZ5MM Noisy Beverage (score: 2): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 15:40:11 -0700; To: <topband@contesting.com> I can think of at least one good reason _NOT_ to run much of the beverage near a transmitting vertical which is over ground which has been improved with many adequately; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00075.html (9,951 bytes)
204. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 2): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 10:39:44 +0000; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Tom, Gee, this sure spread to lot's of groups! While that is a novel and simple feed method, and very creative, users should be aware of some potential problems (just; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00070.html (11,704 bytes)
205. TopBand: Alpha Delta DXB (score: 2): Author: opreda@infonet.com.py (Ruben Preda); Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 01:47:47 -0400; I need to know opinions about the performance on 160m of the Alpha Delta DXB Multiband Sloper Antenna (160-80-40-30 meters), or some projects of antennas for small spaces (slopers, S92SS antenna or s; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00200.html (6,733 bytes)
206. TopBand: Re: problem with half sloper for 160 meters (score: 2): Author: rtym@ippt.gov.pl (Ryszard Tymkiewicz); Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 09:19:32 +0100; I had the same situation.I'm using 18m high tower with TH6DXX and A3WS on the top. I was not able to tune my half sloper on 160m using only one "arm" of the antenna. Anyway ,I added shorter wire /abo; /archives//html/Topband/1998-02/msg00022.html (9,576 bytes)
207. TopBand: Hints on low band RX antennas. (score: 2): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 14:40:25 -0500 (EST); I had quite a few inquiries about Dog Loop and other antennas. Let me briefly describe some of those that I used, they might be helpfull to those with limited space, noisy locations or add some diver; /archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00013.html (13,132 bytes)
208. TopBand: Vertical vs horizontal (score: 2): Author: K2EK@aol.com (K2EK@aol.com); Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 18:28:51 -0400 (EDT); << Have been watching the discussion with interest. I suspect it's not so much vertical vs. horizontal antennas, but high-angle vs. low-angle radiation. As such, to be a "big gun" on 160 you really n; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00354.html (8,936 bytes)
209. TopBand: TOBH report (score: 2): Author: jhenders@zianet.com (Jim Henderson); Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 12:49:25 +0000; Greetings fellow insomniacs: Can't match N6TR's sunset report, pretty slim pickin's here in The Original Black Hole. Saw spots for VK6HD after 1115Z, but couldn't hear Mike. Then the 96W142 net buoy; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00262.html (6,966 bytes)
210. TopBand: Shunt-fed Towers (score: 2): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 20:03:57 EDT; Dear Topbanders: Ever since I posted info here on shunt-feed values for various-height Rohn 25 towers, I've been playing with EZNEC trying to perfect modeling shunt-feed systems based on the real-wor; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00215.html (8,196 bytes)
211. TopBand: Sloper Array and Baluns (score: 2): Author: rfedor@cloudnet.com (Ralph Fedor); Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 07:38:19 -0500; Topbanders -- This fall I hope to complete a new tower/antenna project with 190 feet of Rohn 55. I'd like to hang four half wave slopers for 160 off the tower at the 180 foot level and switch them wi; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00031.html (7,118 bytes)
212. TopBand: Re: Rohn Tower on 160m (score: 2): Author: jhenders@tdrss.wsc.nasa.gov (Jim Henderson); Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 08:07:26 -0600; Phil, Earl, and reflectees: An additional thought: I used the Rohn 3-foot top bearing shelf, a pair of non-Rohn thrust bearings, a 18-aluminum 2" mast,and a ground strap (on 80m). I mounted the 2 bea; /archives//html/Topband/1997-08/msg00065.html (8,906 bytes)
213. TopBand: Re: Fact and Fantasy about Beverage Antennas (score: 2): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 16:23:35 EDT; Vee and >Slopers were outhearing the Beverages. Second night I cut the suckers in half >and voila! 160m sounded like 20 with Eus booming in, killing the other >antennas. == Fantasy: "The longer the B; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00140.html (13,697 bytes)
214. TopBand: Prevailing angles of propagation (score: 2): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:09:20 -0400 (EDT); There seem to be desire to get the lowest possible angle of radiation from the antennas in hope of achieving super DX signal performance. This is probably fuelled by the experiences on higher bands,; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00134.html (9,001 bytes)
215. TopBand: Re: TopBand- Loading Your Tower (score: 2): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 23:12:33 EDT; RE>>TopBand: New antenna on loaded tower 7/25/97 Fred, I've been watching this discussion go back and forth and decided to comment. I run the following system: Tower is 85 feet of Rohn 45 with insula; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00098.html (11,969 bytes)
216. TopBand: Split Gorunds for Folded Feed Verticals? (score: 2): Author: grimm@alison.sbc.edu (Kenneth D. Grimm); Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 12:36:17 -0400; Tom, This thread has been very interesting. While it may be perplexing and irritating to some it is very thought provoking to me. I have used a variety of antennas on 160...dipole at about 70 feet, i; /archives//html/Topband/1997-05/msg00010.html (10,539 bytes)
217. TopBand: Topband Newsletter (Part 4) (score: 2): Author: g3xtt@compuserve.com (Don Field); Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 17:14:22 -0400; (continued from Part 3 - posted by g3xtt@compuserve.com) earlier, but I am still very busy and by the way , tomorrow I probably shall leave my home QTH for my next trip as OK4DWJ/MM . While I started; /archives//html/Topband/1997-04/msg00110.html (11,810 bytes)
218. TopBand: 160 ant/ 80 elev feed (score: 2): Author: N5JA@contesting.com (Jon Barclay N5JA); Date: Thu, 28 Nov 1996 10:34:30 +0000; I usually keep my mouth (fingers?) shut to protect the visibility of my ignorance, but, what the heck... the subject seems to have hung around for a while... I have a 135' tower with stuff on top inc; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00428.html (8,392 bytes)
219. TopBand: EA3JE (score: 2): Author: jmata@nil.fut.es (EA3VY JOSE MATA GARRIGA); Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 18:42:48 -0600; Hello friends: good sigs around the world but very often it seems that is deaf on the receiving side. This is due to the fact that he has the big problem to have a 220 Kv power line at about 50 meter; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00351.html (8,102 bytes)
220. TopBand: Goniometer (score: 2): Author: tree@lady.axian.com (Larry Tyree); Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 13:59:45 -0700 (PDT); While having lunch with W2VJN this week, he mentioned he knew a guy who used a goniometer with some slopers. Here is a reference to one at a station in very far northern Canada: The intercept antenna; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00346.html (7,577 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]