Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ slopers: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: Kites? (score: 2)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 14:48:09 -0600
Good Luck meeting these requirements! § 101.15 Notice requirements. <https://www.ecfr.gov/on/2022-12-09/title-14/section-101.15> No person may operate an unshielded moored balloon or kite more than 1
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00105.html (10,655 bytes)

82. Re: Topband: Kites? (score: 2)
Author: Boye Christensen via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 21:36:53 +0100
Hi Keep in mind a 1/2 wave vertical feeding inpedance 1-3 Kohm this means high voltage ? ON4UN tried on his isolated tover for 164m 40m high to do so on 80 m, and only worked on low power ? Ended up
/archives//html/Topband/2022-12/msg00104.html (8,845 bytes)

83. Re: Topband: 1/4 wave sloper..aka half sloper. (score: 2)
Author: Mark Robinson <markrob@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 14:49:24 -0500
My sloper is fed at the 72 foot point on an 86 foot tower where the coax is grounded to the tower leg and with about 12 feet of mast above the tower ..  This wasn't enough on 160 and I added a 130 fo
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00106.html (8,760 bytes)

84. Topband: 1/4 wave sloper..aka half sloper. (score: 2)
Author: Robert Parkes via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:06:33 +0000 (UTC)
With regard to the discussion on 1/4 wave slopers are members feeding the sloper at the top end against the tower or at the bottom against the ground system ? My understanding from the ARRL HB  is a
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00090.html (7,835 bytes)

85. Re: Topband: 1/4 wave sloper..aka half sloper. (score: 2)
Author: <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:07:12 -0800
--Original Message-- From: Topband <topband-bounces+chetmoore=cox.net@contesting.com> On Behalf Of Mark Robinson Sent: Friday, January 14, 2022 4:59 PM To: jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net <jim.thom@telus
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00089.html (8,889 bytes)

86. Re: Topband: 1/4 wave sloper..aka half sloper. (score: 2)
Author: Mark Robinson <markrob@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:59:11 -0500
I am using a modified Alpha Delta DX-A    1/4 wave sloper attached at approx 72 feet on my 86 foot tower.  I removed the loading coil and now have 5  wires whch are two full size 160m wires, two full
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00088.html (8,687 bytes)

87. Re: Topband: 1/4 wave sloper..aka half sloper. (score: 2)
Author: Larry <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 09:06:19 -0500
I have had similar results with half sloper connected at 50 feet on a 100 foot tower (45G). I have radials now but didn't always have them but never tried to do a definitive look to see if the radial
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00082.html (9,053 bytes)

88. Re: Topband: 1/4 wave sloper..aka half sloper. (score: 2)
Author: "Steve" <ve7sl@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:38:31 -0800
Jim ... Since getting on topband I've only used a half-sloper hung from the top of my 48' Delhi tower. I'm presently at 163 DXCC, mostly CW. The base of the tower connects to ~60 buried radials of va
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00080.html (7,861 bytes)

89. Topband: 1/4 wave sloper..aka half sloper. (score: 2)
Author: "jim.thom jim.thom@telus.net" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 14:00:22 -0800
Have any of you folks used, or tried a half sloper.... aka 1/4 wave sloper ? Loaded or otherwise ? I'm talking about say terminated up 80-90' up a tower. I have used slopers on 75m with reasonable su
/archives//html/Topband/2022-01/msg00079.html (6,666 bytes)

90. Re: Topband: : Twin Sloper (score: 2)
Author: <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 13:16:58 -0400
Ed, What frequency are we talking about? I use center fed loaded slopers on my 70 ft tower for 80M. Some people use the tower (shield) and sloping wire (center). I have not had as much success with t
/archives//html/Topband/2021-07/msg00002.html (6,394 bytes)

91. Re: Topband: T Top Verticals and yagis (score: 2)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:31:19 -0500
There is no question about vertical vs horizontal and also time of NVIS vs low angle prop. The question started about whether the L was the same as a T. Its not. However, ad Mark states, having 2 ant
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00031.html (12,109 bytes)

92. Re: Topband: Which RX antenna is better? (score: 2)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:12:40 -0400
David, Diversity is an interesting feature. I found even a mostly horizontal long wire to the sub Rx was an asset with diversity. With the two HI-Z systems & dual Rx K3s, I have three antennas to wor
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00144.html (16,520 bytes)

93. Re: Topband: Which RX antenna is better? (score: 2)
Author: CUTTER DAVID via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:32:03 +0100 (BST)
Kevin This might help on a small lot: I am very fortunate to have a dual rx K3S and I am planning to use 2 flags at right-angles in the corner of the field I've been loaned. Being in the bushes and a
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00143.html (13,941 bytes)

94. Re: Topband: Which RX antenna is better? (score: 2)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 14:01:03 -0400 (EDT)
On my small lot (130 ft by 50 ft, but it does have a house on it, hi hi) about the only half decent and flexible RX antenna I can manage is a K9AY. And it definitely helps most of the time, useful on
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00131.html (11,615 bytes)

95. Re: Topband: Which RX antenna is better? (score: 2)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:07:12 -0700
As a minority report by one, IMO the simplest, smallest, cheapest, good RDF receive antenna is the DHDL. RDF around 9, pretty good for $20 of wire, one BN-73-202, one resistor, some string and two tr
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00130.html (13,348 bytes)

96. Re: Topband: Which RX antenna is better? (score: 2)
Author: CUTTER DAVID via Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:27:59 +0100 (BST)
If it hasn't already been mentioned, here's something to watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyZR9uMBnIo all about receive antennas. about an hour in W3LPL gets into more detail about high and low
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00128.html (11,775 bytes)

97. Re: Topband: Which RX antenna is better? (score: 2)
Author: terry burge <ki7m@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 00:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Hi again folks, Got some great advice from several others. 'Shared Apex'; KD9SV bi-directional beverage recommended; K9AY (guess I need to get busy and finish mine); Hi-Z 8 along with Waller-Flag at
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00127.html (10,274 bytes)

98. Re: Topband: Which RX antenna is better? (score: 2)
Author: "John Harden, D.M.D." <jhdmd@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:45:28 -0400
I am using a Hi-Z 8 here along with a Waller Flag?? (From N4IS es TopBand Systems) at 95 feet. In the past I had up a K9AY antennas, several short beverages and several Ewe's. I also had up a low dip
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00116.html (10,940 bytes)

99. Re: Topband: Which RX antenna is better? (score: 2)
Author: Mark - N5OT <r-emails@n5ot.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:40:47 -0500
This is a really good answer. Thanks Tim. 73 - Mark N5OT On 7/29/2019 7:12 AM, Tim Shoppa wrote: Terry, I strongly encourage you to put up the K9AY. By no numerical measure is it the best. But its ea
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00114.html (9,236 bytes)

100. Re: Topband: Which RX antenna is better? (score: 2)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 08:12:56 -0400
Terry, I strongly encourage you to put up the K9AY. By no numerical measure is it the best. But its easy to put up and Compared to all the others, it is relatively insensitive to other objects around
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00113.html (8,821 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu