Mail Archive Search: <+from:Billg@warwick.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:Billg@warwick.net: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: SSB on CW segment (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:19:35 -0800; To the complainers that SSB is on the CW portion of 160 meters during the contest, sorry but during the CW contest you can find CW ops all the way up to 1.900! I didn't see any SSB ops complaining ab; /archives//html/Topband/2001-02/msg00086.html (7,575 bytes)
22. Topband: Ground Radials (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:32:22 -0800; As per my previous msg, I will soon be installing an inverted "L" and of course I must install ground radials. Question: Do the ground radials need to be un-insulated or insulated. The way I look at; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00264.html (7,223 bytes)
23. Topband: California ssb contacs (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 15:42:21 -0800; Gentlemen, I can work California, Oregon and Washington states SSB on 160 meters faily consistently from this NJ qth. My dipole is only at 40 ft. Disregarding the low dipole, on what propagation mode; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00012.html (6,943 bytes)
24. Topband: Wideband Noise (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 22:46:14 -0800; I went on a noise hunt in my house even to the point of actually pulling dimmer controls out of the wall to see if anything changed. After exhausting all possible sources, I said to myself what else; /archives//html/Topband/2000-12/msg00148.html (7,444 bytes)
25. Topband: Unidentified signals (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:25:26 -0800; On the morning of November 13, 2000 at around 6:30 am EST, I heard (2) stations speaking what may have been Russian or Polish. Since I am not a judge of language, I can only say it sounded like those; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00064.html (7,028 bytes)
26. Topband: Dipole and Ladder Line (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:40:18 -0800; Can anyone tell me if the 70 ft. vertical length of ladder line that feeds my 160 meter dipole contributes anything to my reception of signals. I know properly installed ladder line will not radiate; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00065.html (7,230 bytes)
27. Topband: Quick disconnect for Ladder Line (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:50:08 -0800; I was wondering if anyone has a neat idea for a quick disconnecting method or device for ladder line. I would like to disconnect my 160 dipole and ladder line during lightning storms but havent found; /archives//html/Topband/2000-11/msg00147.html (7,861 bytes)
28. Topband: PSK 31 on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 20:27:58 -0400; Being new to the 160 meter band, I was wondering why I have not heard any activity using the PSK31 mode on top band. I tried a sked with another ham about 100 miles from my qth and it worked out quit; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00032.html (6,884 bytes)
29. Topband: All PSK31 Enthusiasts (score: 1): Author: billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 21:27:04 -0400; Just finished working W1GF and NR1DX on 1.824.00. These were my first PSK31 contacts on 160 and the first PSK31 signals I have seen on 160. I just kept calling CQ on PSK and finally got the two conta; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00048.html (7,273 bytes)
30. Topband: PSK 31 Enthusiast and others (score: 1): Author: billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 15:43:18 -0400; Gentlemen, I received some critical reviews of my PSK31 contacts and the following frequencies and times will apply to all future PSK31 activities. All PSK31 transmissions will be between 1.800 and 1; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00058.html (8,169 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]