Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:JSimon@GrahamDunn.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Titanex V160S and tuning unit (score: 1)
Author: <JSimon@GrahamDunn.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 17:31:28 -0800
I'm in the process of assembling a Titanex V160S vertical. Suffice to say that the instructions leave a lot to be desired. They are on the skimpy side, and the "English" is very difficult to understa
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00035.html (7,213 bytes)

2. Topband: Vertical SWR problem (score: 1)
Author: <JSimon@GrahamDunn.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:45:29 -0800
I've just installed a Titanex V160S vertical (87') with a V160AS (160m only) tuning unit. Yesterday I connected 12 radials (130') each, adjusted the taps on the tuning unit coil with an MFJ SWR analy
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00233.html (7,154 bytes)

3. RE: Topband: Conditions this weekend (score: 1)
Author: <JSimon@GrahamDunn.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:36:26 -0800
I think it depends on where you are on the West Coast. Up here in the Seattle area, where we can have very different propagation from those of you in California, especially southern California, signa
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00266.html (9,483 bytes)

4. RE: Topband: Vertical SWR problem (score: 1)
Author: <JSimon@GrahamDunn.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:59:26 -0800
<IMHO it might be just a problem of SWR-measurement... because of the inevitable stray pick up of the relatively long vertical I'd never try to match a low band vertical using an MFJ-type SWR-bridge,
/archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00022.html (10,093 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu