- 1. TopBand: VK9WM 80 & 160 (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 06:00:19 -0400 (EDT)
- AD6C and I worked VK9WM on both 80 & 160 CW around 0900Z. He was very readable on 80 and even stronger on 160. He continued to CQ with a big pileup calling. Didn't hear anyone else work him on either
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00186.html (6,887 bytes)
- 2. TopBand: A good morning! (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 10:58:12 -0500 (EST)
- HI Y'all Got up early and got the worm. Started hearing S21XX around 1400Z working JAs on 1826.6. Same frequency as yesterday. He came back at 1410Z and then worked W6AJJ. No other DX stations were h
- /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00197.html (7,078 bytes)
- 3. TopBand: XZ1N to West Coast (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 15:09:13 -0500
- Hi Garry, Great report. I got up here around 1300Z. Could copy XZ1N starting around 1315Z. He was weak but no QRN so copy was solid. He was working UA9;s etc. His code speed was fast so I assumed tha
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00352.html (7,297 bytes)
- 4. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Tue, 1 Oct 1996 03:04:10 -0400
- HI John, Your comments are refreshing as they are accurate and clearly state the case that absolute statements are not always true no matter how many names are quoted. Keep up the inputs. Don't let t
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00004.html (7,481 bytes)
- 5. TopBand: From 3DA0CA (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:11:41 -0400
- Jon, Please continue the swl reports. We would like to see how the propagation moves West as the season gets better. The East coast boys list very few spots. Most of us out here, including me, want t
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00043.html (7,146 bytes)
- 6. TopBand: Inverted V antenna on 160 (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 10:11:44 -0400
- HI Bob, You are illustrating what I have been trying to say despite QRM. That is, the best antenna for you is the best antenna. It is vastly different for different objectives, locations, and band co
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00044.html (7,997 bytes)
- 7. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 03:51:52 -0400
- Hi Eric, Congratulations on your eloquent and informative response to Jay's pastural plea. As you state the "connection" loss can easily be eliminated with as few as two well balanced radials. Howeve
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00164.html (9,582 bytes)
- 8. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 00:08:56 -0400
- Hi Roy, Keep in mind that the vertical radiating section should carry the most current hence the top hat. I believe that aluminum tubing topped with a good coil and a hat or a flat-top is preferred o
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00176.html (8,638 bytes)
- 9. TopBand: Matching transformmers (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 20:26:54 -0400
- Gentlemen, Please allow me to comment on another "universal truth" that ain't quite so. Despite publication in ON4UN's authoritative book on Low Band antennas the ideal transformer for a Beverage ant
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00132.html (7,915 bytes)
- 10. TopBand: first eu of season (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 10:11:38 -0400
- HI Rag, We don't count contacts between Europe and W1/VE1 as news at any time of the year. Try it from the West coast! We expect the first Eu from California in the next few days. BCNU Darrell, N6DX@
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00136.html (7,061 bytes)
- 11. TopBand: Splitting Beverage antenna output (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 10:11:36 -0400
- Dave, Most of our Beverages are over 1000' long but they perform well even up to 30 Meters. Also, since we usually have more than one operator on a band we split our Beverages into four sets of outpu
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00137.html (7,437 bytes)
- 12. TopBand: Matching transformmers (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 18:40:13 -0400
- Gentlemen, Please allow me to comment on another "universal truth" that ain't quite so. Despite publication in ON4UN's authoritative book on Low Band antennas the ideal transformer for a Beverage ant
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00140.html (7,924 bytes)
- 13. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 11:22:14 -0400
- HI Kevin, There is a great fascination with inverted L's on the East coast. As you know any antenna will work DX from there. I can tell you that from the West coast we must be more careful with where
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00235.html (9,666 bytes)
- 14. TopBand: Inverted-L question (score: 1)
- Author: N6DX@aol.com (N6DX@aol.com)
- Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 00:07:01 -0400
- HI Tom, Your knowledge has beed very beneficial to the topband antenna discussions. However, there are many factors to optimizing a 160m antenna. The first thing you have to do is decide what you wan
- /archives//html/Topband/1996-09/msg00249.html (9,558 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu