Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RadioXX@charter.net: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Topband: Protecting an Array Solutions K9AY Loop from Transmitted RF (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:25:03 -0500
It's likely you won't need any protection from the transmitter (lightning protection may be another story). To verify this you can either use an oscilloscope on the output of the K9AY or just build a
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00054.html (9,193 bytes)

62. Re: Topband: BOG Beverage on Ground Help (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:09:24 -0600
Mikek said: "I'd like to apply the loading to a BOG to slow the VF and make it seems longer. ie. make a 80 meter BOG length work on 160 Meters. But then make the reactance go away for 80 Meters My ac
/archives//html/Topband/2019-11/msg00098.html (9,990 bytes)

63. Re: Topband: BOG with variable inductors (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 14:18:43 -0600
That's a good thought but the solution isn't obvious and the devil is in the details. Most three terminal regulators can be configured as current sources but I doubt that their output impedance will
/archives//html/Topband/2019-11/msg00129.html (10,577 bytes)

64. Re: Topband: BOG (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:49:43 -0600
You won't have any success trying to rename a BOG. A BOG (Beverage On the Ground) is an accurate and appropriate name. Harold's first "Beverage" was actually a BOG. A short time later it was raised a
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00016.html (7,137 bytes)

65. Re: Topband: Beverage performance VS term resistor (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:00:03 -0600
In EZNEC the RDF number is the difference between the average gain and the gain at the elevation angle you select. W8JI uses 20 degrees as the reference and some other systems use a slightly differen
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00311.html (11,991 bytes)

66. Re: Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 09:19:45 -0500
W4EF said: Reading that QRZ.com thread you linked to and reflecting on K4SAV's measurements and how much they appeared to vary over a fairly short period of time, got me wondering about what could be
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00325.html (12,750 bytes)

67. Re: Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:49:03 -0500
KZ1W said: "If NEC2 is wrong, so is NEC4." - I don't think so since a different ground modeling approach is available in NEC4.2. Running EZNEC Pro4 antennas both in 2 and 4.2 sometimes shows signific
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00328.html (15,011 bytes)

68. Re: Topband: Loop on the ground as a counterpoise (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 08:00:36 -0500
Without more detail of your system, the cause is only a guess. Here are some possibilities. A single wire isn't much of a ground plane. It will make a vertical directional. When you change from a sin
/archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00022.html (12,005 bytes)

69. Re: Topband: Loop on the ground as a counterpoise (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 08:17:30 -0500
Another thought. Changing to a good ground system with a good choke at the antenna feedpoint will make your vertical omnidirectional, but that may not solve the noise problem,. You may need a directi
/archives//html/Topband/2020-05/msg00023.html (12,551 bytes)

70. Re: Topband: RFI (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:02:24 -0500
Power pole noise can be difficult to find with a portable receiver that is not directional. It's also difficult to find when all you have is an ultrasonic detector because those have to be pointed ri
/archives//html/Topband/2020-06/msg00063.html (8,929 bytes)

71. Topband: For sale? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:16:39 -0500
I just looked thru a bunch of old Topband messages and found 130 messages pertaining to FOR SALE items. Many of those were when the forum was under different management however. Perhaps it is time to
/archives//html/Topband/2020-07/msg00044.html (6,862 bytes)

72. Re: Topband: For sale? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:53:57 -0500
Tree already posted that ads are not allowed on this list. The OP apologized and promised to not do it again. Some lists do allow relevant ads. Etiquette requires us to ask first. /relurk Yes and I e
/archives//html/Topband/2020-07/msg00046.html (7,148 bytes)

73. Re: Topband: Common mode choking of beverages - which side of grounded shack entry panel? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 20:33:26 -0500
W3LPL said "A peripherally related issue: Running DC power through the same coax cable as low level RF signals is asking for trouble." I agree completely. Here is my story of trying this. Maybe this
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00021.html (10,192 bytes)

74. Re: Topband: John ON4UN silent key (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 12:27:21 -0600
My first contact with ON4UN was in 2006 when I finally moved and got enough space to put up a 160 antenna. I have worked him many times since. His Low Band DXing Books I use as reading material when
/archives//html/Topband/2020-11/msg00074.html (8,584 bytes)

75. Re: Topband: Low Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:17:39 -0600
Saying 160 propagation is complicated is an understatement. Otherwise someone would have already figured this stuff out. One other contributor that has to be added to the mix is the effect of Earth's
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00137.html (6,668 bytes)

76. Re: Topband: Low Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:48:20 -0600
https://web.archive.org/web/20180815141931/http://w0btu.com/160_meters.html After you read W8JI's comments, put these two antennas on EZNEC. It will say the dipole smokes the vertical at all elevatio
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00186.html (8,400 bytes)

77. Re: Topband: Help with SAQ RX (A Little off Topic) (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 13:22:51 -0500
I think you would be better off using a different antenna. Gain of that antenna on 17.2 kHz will be much less than -100 dBi. I can't give you an exact number because EZNEC doesn't display numbers les
/archives//html/Topband/2022-06/msg00001.html (7,463 bytes)

78. Re: Topband: QRM Eliminator (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 11:35:05 -0500
This link shows a schematic of this thing. (Assuming it's the same as the packaged version.) https://tinyurl.com/3pkvzdft Jerry, K4SAV Search for QRM Eliminator. Cost is around $60. These are useful
/archives//html/Topband/2022-10/msg00006.html (7,716 bytes)

79. Re: Topband: Loop on Ground receiving antenna. (score: 1)
Author: Jerry and Faye <RadioXX@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 10:26:44 -0500
You are correct.  It is rubbish.  I built it and recorded measurements because there was so much hype about it.  I got exactly what I expected.  A high angle omnidirectional antenna is not a DX recei
/archives//html/Topband/2023-05/msg00003.html (8,534 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu