Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com: 311 ]

Total 311 documents matching your query.

101. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 08:34:22 -0600
And, with all of that said, Tom - your technical evaluation and "cautionary" statements are spot on and I, for one, enjoy reading and assimilating as much of it all as my feeble brain allows - your f
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00145.html (12,900 bytes)

102. Re: Topband: XX9 Macao dxpedition (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:09:47 -0600
OK - found the info at this url: http://adxg.org/macau/plans.php 72, Jim R. K9JWV I see a mention, in the latest ARRL DX news, of an upcoming dxpetition to XX9 land - I googled it all and found a cou
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00228.html (9,101 bytes)

103. Re: Topband: Stew Perry Warmup this weekend (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:43:53 -0600
Hopefully lots of QRP entries, like myself - looking forward to a fun event and sure hope to work lots of ya! 72, Jim R. K9JWV _______________________________________________ Remember the PreStew com
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00253.html (7,642 bytes)

104. Re: Topband: Thrashing around in the Stew (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:30:13 -0600
Wish I woulda heard ya., Jim - would have been nice to have you in my log. Ended up with 80 Qs with one KL7 and three KH6s in the mix. Longest stateside Q was either a fella in PA or a fella in NC (c
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00275.html (9,202 bytes)

105. Re: Topband: Antenna analysers in close proximity to BC station (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 06:07:48 -0700
So, I'm looking at setting a EWE antenna up - what happens if I simply make it a full loop? In other words, instead of driving 4' ground rods in at both ends I run a wire between the bottom of the te
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00061.html (8,904 bytes)

106. Topband: EWE antenna question (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 06:10:10 -0700
_______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00062.html (6,612 bytes)

107. Re: Topband: Antenna analysers in close proximity to BC station (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 06:22:49 -0700
Thanks, Tom - looks like running that "bottom wire" would be "worth it" 'cuz I have one 4' ground rod near where I want to install the EWE so that saves the cost of buying another rod...Hi Hi. Apprec
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00065.html (10,459 bytes)

108. Re: Topband: Antenna analysers in close proximity to BC station (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:22:38 -0700
Tom: is there data that nail down the horizontal wire to vertical wire ratio? I see in that write up by wa1on mention of 2.25:1 h to v but...is that some rule that can't be violated or.../ For instan
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00066.html (11,626 bytes)

109. Topband: Further discussions on EWEs (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:23:26 -0700
Tom, et al: is there data that nail down the horizontal wire to vertical wire ratio? I see in that write up by wa1on mention of 2.25:1 h to v but...is that some rule that can't be violated or.../ For
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00067.html (11,519 bytes)

110. Re: Topband: Further discussions on EWEs (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:35:17 -0700
thank you, Tom - great info! _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00070.html (11,805 bytes)

111. Re: Topband: FCP (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 18:24:02 -0700
Guy: great review of all that you did, as far as opting to go the "FCP route," and why. I opted to go with sixty elevated radials and, like you, have some "proof" that the decision worked for me as I
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00106.html (20,514 bytes)

112. Re: Topband: Vertical Array Over Uneven Ground (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:05:29 -0700
Gosh, Paul.....why don't you simply keep measuring in our system and avoid the obvious "mental wedgie" you keep forming PLUS you won't be so "weary"?!?!?! 72, Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV ___________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00246.html (10,313 bytes)

113. Topband: Contacting a PT0S person (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:49:56 -0700
Just looked at their online log and see they don't show me as having a QSO with them on 80 -- but I did - so....anyone know who I can e-mail to have them recheck their log?? I even have a fella who w
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00276.html (6,903 bytes)

114. Topband: WX @ PT0S (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:16:22 -0700
Albeit video taped in March, still...not THE most hospitable location EVEN in full sun, one would expect! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4Sx5fBNtPA 72, Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV _________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00290.html (6,731 bytes)

115. Re: Topband: ZL9HR (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:24:48 -0700
I think I read at their site that they'll be off the island from 0600Z to 1100Z (or something like that - can't find the url where I read up on that but we can be certain that someone WILL correct an
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00382.html (7,860 bytes)

116. Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 14:32:04 -0700
Dave's observation regarding us QRPers being patient as the bigger stations will work hard to pull us through is spot on! PJ2T, for instance, tried VERY hard to work me this morning but no joy and it
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00036.html (10,802 bytes)

117. Re: Topband: Patience in ARRL 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:58:51 -0700
Wellllllllllllllllllllllllll, the problem with not sending SOMETHING after your last call, assuming you are calling CQ, is that one doesn't know whether you are calling someone or calling CQ! Exaampl
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00082.html (9,890 bytes)

118. Re: Topband: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - 3Y0IOF (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 06:28:06 -0700
Doooooood!!! You deserve a Pulitzer Prize, or the Warwick Prize for writing or SOMETHING for that gem! Damn, Man - spot on!!! _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topba
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00118.html (12,294 bytes)

119. Re: Topband: 160 WAS Skeds (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:57:37 -0700
Joe: go here for an excellent QSO scheduler resource: http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/ 72, Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV Good luck with WAS! I finished mine, QRP version, last February! _________________ Topba
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00059.html (7,562 bytes)

120. Topband: Changing received signal levels (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:59:02 -0700
I saw an exchange here, earlier, where someone was mentioning calling a station with a weak signal, only having them come back with a stronger signal. I witnessed that more than just a couple of time
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00220.html (8,281 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu