Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com: 311 ]

Total 311 documents matching your query.

81. Topband: Still NEED a RI QSO and QSL for QRP WAS on 80 meters! (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:12:53 -0600
OK - I've completed the VT QSO (thanks to K2LI) and have a sked with a MA fella this coming Sunday morning at 0945Z.....but, no joy on a RI QSO. Anybody from the great Ocean State in the mood to unpl
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00140.html (6,920 bytes)

82. Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 06:33:16 -0600
I'm fine with that notion (less is 'ok') but notice that is for radials at ground level or slightly below. Through the efforts of a fellow ham I now have the model for my newest vertical antenna vers
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00014.html (10,267 bytes)

83. Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 18:52:38 -0600
What about radials above the ground? Like what I'm planning to install -- base of the vertical at around 5' to 6' above ground and slope all of the radials from that 5' or 6' point down to the ground
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00025.html (9,976 bytes)

84. Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 09:12:18 -0600
Thank you, Richard, fore passing the paper on....looks like I won't "suffer" by having elevated radials in the least. Jim R. K9JWV _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00038.html (11,708 bytes)

85. Topband: Info on a parts kit for a KD9SV 160 meter preamp (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:02:39 -0600
Anyone know of a source for the parts to build a KD9SV 160 meter preamp? I picked up the board and info from FAR Circuits at the Dayton hamvention and just curious if someone is selling the parts in
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00024.html (6,844 bytes)

86. Re: Topband: Receiving loops (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 08:04:32 -0600
_______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00116.html (9,595 bytes)

87. Topband: CW Ops yearly "event" tomorrow (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 06:34:42 -0600
If you hear some of us on Top Band calling "CQ CWT" and have the time we'd appreciate a reply - the CW Ops club is hosting its yearly CW Open contest tomorrow. The contest is made up of three four ho
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00356.html (8,291 bytes)

88. Re: Topband: CW Ops yearly "event" tomorrow (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:01:58 -0600
Yes, Zulu time _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00363.html (8,699 bytes)

89. Topband: URL for the Stew Perry in October and December? (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:30:22 -0600
WA7BNM's contest calendar shows a Stew Perry Top Band challenge contest in October but the listed url doesn't work - any ideas on a good url for the Stew web page? 72, Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV __________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00370.html (7,156 bytes)

90. Re: Topband: URL for the Stew Perry in October and December? (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 05:37:58 -0600
Will do, Steve! Jim R. K9JWV _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00001.html (7,708 bytes)

91. Re: Topband: The use of digital modes on 160 metres (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 07:13:21 -0600
Tom: you said, "A bit of bent wire can easily work 200+ countries on 160 on CW. Probably more so than on "digital" modes at the present time." I doubt that's gonna happen if you're using output power
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00160.html (14,097 bytes)

92. Re: Topband: The use of digital modes on 160 metres (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:57:18 -0600
I side with you, Mike, on the interloping attitude of SSB! I'm a CW afficianado as others are -- goin _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00171.html (18,249 bytes)

93. Re: Topband: 9M2AX (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:37:35 -0600
With QRP power here and no BOG (do have a Dipole On the Ground, DOG, that I NEED to reconnect) I'd sure be challenged to hear or work that one, Dave, BUT...did put RW0CR in the log this A.M. so I'm s
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00319.html (8,066 bytes)

94. Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:10:39 -0600
Has anyone employed that K6STI receive antenna? It doesn't equal a Beverage, for sure, BUT - for a small footprint area it looks interesting. I'd think it wouldn't matter if one used 450 ohm ladder l
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00046.html (6,964 bytes)

95. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:38:35 -0600
Well, there is no "modeling" associated with this effort, Tom - they just "did it".....built it, tuned it and used it! I've attached the article for perusal, if interested....Jim R. _________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00064.html (8,444 bytes)

96. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:10:48 -0600
Great - I appreciate you revisiting the article....I am going to try it in a week or so. Jim R. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00072.html (8,829 bytes)

97. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:43:13 -0600
And, in my case, Don, I simply need to put up an antenna that's: a) more efficient than my vertical and b) fits within the confines of my property....having any noise cancelling or nulling is a plus
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00076.html (9,682 bytes)

98. Re: Topband: 1810 (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:35:17 -0600
Oh, so now it's all about DX and not about "the little guy"? Did you forget that 1810 is listed as the QRP frequency? I've heard Jon, AA1K, down around there calling CQ DX several times in the mornin
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00130.html (8,658 bytes)

99. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:43:42 -0600
Hardy and others - thank you MUCHO Beaucoup! All replies were filled with sound suggestions or anecdotal evidence that have helped me put together a trade study that is leading me to.....erect a hori
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00131.html (11,558 bytes)

100. Re: Topband: K6STI low noise receive loop (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <rodenkirch_llc@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 07:51:10 -0600
I will let all know, Bob - plan to erect it in about two weeks, in preparation for the Pre-Stew and the ARRL 160 contest (I'll be on travel the month of December so will miss out on the Big Stew) and
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00136.html (10,794 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu