- 1. Topband: Titanex V160HD (score: 1)
- Author: chris@manyoaks.co.uk (G3SVL)
- Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 21:16:13 +0000
- Hi Andree I have one and it's does what I want. I leave mine cranked down in neighbour-friendly mode and then just wind it up when I want to use it. Takes less than 5 mins to raise or lower. I use m
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00104.html (7,464 bytes)
- 2. Topband: Titanex V160HD (score: 1)
- Author: chris@manyoaks.co.uk (G3SVL)
- Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 10:34:56 +0000
- Two additional comments to my previous posting (you know, the one's you remember just after you hit send!) 1) I do not have the Titanex tuner - it's easy to build your own and IMO theirs offers noth
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00110.html (7,175 bytes)
- 3. Topband: CQWW160 2003 (score: 1)
- Author: chris@manyoaks.co.uk (G3SVL)
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:03:17 +0100
- conform with other >CQ sponsored contests. Is there a limit on the operating hours? e.g. 30 or 36 max? de Chris G3SVL -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/plain
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00176.html (6,467 bytes)
- 4. Topband: Bandplan/contest - a view from EU (score: 1)
- Author: chris@manyoaks.co.uk (Chris Duckling)
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:58:39 +0000
- Hi all The new bandplan certainly did spread the NA stations out this year - most welcome. I had more NA QSO's above 1900KHz in my 4 hours of operating than in the last 10 years of entering! Had to p
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00163.html (7,040 bytes)
- 5. Topband: Re: Delta Loops (score: 1)
- Author: chris@manyoaks.co.uk (Chris Duckling)
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 21:10:07 +0000
- For an excellent discussion of delta loops close to the ground and the effects of different feed points - all done in the pre-computer model days - see G3AQC's article in 1974 RadCom (May '74 I think
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-11/msg00044.html (6,459 bytes)
- 6. Topband: 42 or 48 hours? (score: 1)
- Author: chris@manyoaks.co.uk (Chris Duckling)
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 09:23:05 +0000
- W4ZV said: " I'm not sure what is the point of endlessly debating this....." Because contests are for the competitors and others who just enjoy the band activity! From the bandwidth generated on this
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-03/msg00067.html (7,007 bytes)
- 7. Topband: Re: 160M BCI (score: 1)
- Author: chris@manyoaks.co.uk (Chris Duckling)
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 12:08:04 +0000
- Earle, you wrote: " ..When I tune up these two new units I get S9+ reception of the AM station at 1890 Khz .." I can't see it being the amp as that should look like 'relay contacts' when on rx. So co
- /archives//html/Topband/2001-02/msg00030.html (7,082 bytes)
- 8. Topband: Where would you like us to go? (score: 1)
- Author: chris@manyoaks.co.uk (Manyoaks)
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:05:36 +0100
- Hi topbanders, You may recall that a group of us activated Jersey (as GJ2D) in the 1999 CQWWDX 160m contest. We got a lot of favourable comments about activating a relatively rare prefix in the conte
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-04/msg00045.html (7,314 bytes)
- 9. Topband: Where would you like us to go - answer (score: 1)
- Author: chris@manyoaks.co.uk (Manyoaks)
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:45:34 +0100
- I recently posted a request to ask where you would like us to go for CQWW160 2001. (see archives 17th April). I received 41 replies with 91 votes cast (i.e. some voted for more than one country). The
- /archives//html/Topband/2000-04/msg00055.html (7,186 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu