- 1. Re: Topband: FT-8 performance (score: 1)
- Author: Marco Cogoni <cogoni@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:09:29 +0200
- Hi, I agree with Jerry. I spent a few weeks trying to use FT8 to obtain antenna radiation patterns and I discovered how the SNR is computed: it's totally flawed. Basically WSJTX computes the number i
- /archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00013.html (14,764 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: FT-8 performance (score: 1)
- Author: Marco Cogoni <cogoni@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 22:29:29 +0200
- If anybody's interested in trying my version of the python FT8 decoder with a more sensible SNR implementation just go here: https://github.com/mcogoni/weakmon I modified the code to look for the low
- /archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00053.html (10,700 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: FT8 on 160 - how you can make a difference (score: 1)
- Author: Marco Cogoni <cogoni@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2019 21:02:08 +0200
- Hi all, FT8 has the advantage of being located in a single frequency. So if one arrives on a totally empty band he'll be attracted to that single "watering hole" just like insects around a lonely lig
- /archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00159.html (13,429 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu