- 81. Topband: Clix (score: 1)
- Author: "Iowaguy" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:35:58 -0600
- Thanks for the replies I've received about the intermittent clix problem I've been experiencing. Spent some time on the problem today but could not get the clix to occur. Several people have suggeste
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00330.html (7,304 bytes)
- 82. Re: Topband: ft1000mp mkv key click mod (score: 1)
- Author: "Iowaguy" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:24:24 -0600
- simple, takes you well into the bowels of the radio. There are many connectors which must be removed, some of which are pretty fragile. To compound things, in a couple of steps the instructions did
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00420.html (7,505 bytes)
- 83. Re: Topband: Franklin Antenna Design (score: 1)
- Author: "Iowaguy" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:52:00 -0600
- AM Station WHO (1040 KHz) here in Des Moines still uses a Franklin antenna...and has one of the best RF signal footprints across the country during hours of darkness. 73...Dave W0FLS ________________
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00202.html (7,561 bytes)
- 84. Topband: Clix update (score: 1)
- Author: "Iowaguy" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:52:26 -0600
- Several weeks ago I mentioned here on the reflector that I had received some reports of a nasty problem with key clicks (tnx W8UVZ, VE3DO, and others). I had some problems replicating the problem but
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00279.html (8,060 bytes)
- 85. Re: Topband: Noon time condx (score: 1)
- Author: "earlham@radiks.net" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:35:25 -0500
- I certainly don't claim to be enough of a physicist to fully understand propagation with any degree of expertise. That said, I have learned over the years that QSO's at high noon over a 1200 mile pat
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00028.html (7,464 bytes)
- 86. Topband: Contesting observations (score: 1)
- Author: "earlham@radiks.net" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:48:59 -0500
- It's terrific to see all the comments about activity in the recent contest. It's a sure sign of passion and enthusiasm. I'd like to briefly share some of my own comments and oberservations. 1. We hav
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00029.html (9,428 bytes)
- 87. Re: Topband: how to set up a Skype receiving beacon (score: 1)
- Author: "earlham@radiks.net" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:29:09 -0500
- Tom hit the nail on the head. Access to a global network of remote receiving sites will make DXCC meaningless as well as negate the effort and resources that many have put into their stations. 73...D
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00049.html (8,923 bytes)
- 88. Topband: Topband alive and well (score: 1)
- Author: "Iowaguy" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:28:51 -0600
- Got up early this morning and found the band to be nice and quiet (which is starting to get unusual here in IA this time of year). Put seven JA stations in the log including some first time stations.
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00185.html (6,777 bytes)
- 89. Topband: 4 sq nesting (score: 1)
- Author: "Iowaguy" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:51:53 -0600
- Topbanders.... Does anyone out there have first hand experience with placing an 80 mtr 4 square inside a 160 mtr 4 square? If so, do you see normal performance from both arrays? I'd like to hear abou
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-04/msg00000.html (6,429 bytes)
- 90. Topband: S01R (score: 1)
- Author: "Iowaguy" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:29:04 -0500
- The S01R group was qrv on 1822 last night. They were very light but copyable between S9 static crashes here in Iowa. I was surprised to find they had very few stateside callers during the time I was
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-04/msg00030.html (6,890 bytes)
- 91. Topband: VI9NI (score: 1)
- Author: "Iowaguy" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 19:59:50 -0500
- The VI9NI team has faithfully been on the lowbands, and topband in particular, for NA sunrise. I found them again this morning abt 1020z on 1823 cqing and lonely. They were good copy with a 559 signa
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-06/msg00011.html (6,428 bytes)
- 92. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
- Author: "David Raymond" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:33:53 -0500
- Greetings topbanders. . . Can anyone give me a recommendation for the value of a choke to use to isolate DC on a coaxial feed line on 160? Any particular pitfalls I should be aware of putting 12vdc o
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00067.html (7,002 bytes)
- 93. Topband: This morning (score: 1)
- Author: "David Raymond" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:22:21 -0500
- A nice surprise this morning with Jon, DU9/N0NM, coming through with a nice signal into Iowa. JA1HQT had the best signal of the season so far (peaking 579). Also, the QRN was the lowest level (mostly
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00111.html (6,648 bytes)
- 94. Topband: (no subject) (score: 1)
- Author: "David Raymond" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:07:12 -0500
- Topband seems to always hold surprises. For the past two or three years I've listened for Ross, 9M2AX, but never heard any sign of him (not even a ping). This morning he was 449 amidst some late summ
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00059.html (7,135 bytes)
- 95. Re: Topband: The 4SQR for 160m a'la K8UR (score: 1)
- Author: "David Raymond" <earlham@radiks.net>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:55:48 -0500
- Jarda: My original 160 mtr 4 sq was in K8UR (bent dipole) configuration. When using classic 0/-90/180 phasing, the F/B was only about 10 db (close to what the modeling shows at about 12 db). A couple
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-10/msg00150.html (8,945 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu