- 1. Re: Topband: ARRL DX: thoughts of a newbye (score: 1)
- Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@highmarks.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:10:50 -0600
- ...snip... But I start a thought and ended up with the fact that their signal surely was down respect to the others I heard. So I thought one reason could be the distance of these stations from the o
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00205.html (10,065 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: 2006 ARRL 160M contest results (score: 1)
- Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@highmarks.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:12:19 -0500
- QST QST -- A quick reminder for non ARRL members -- QST QST The Web report is currently only available to the membership. And very soon the searchable scores database will also be available to the me
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-04/msg00117.html (7,723 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Extreme directivity (score: 1)
- Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@highmarks.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:35:10 -0500
- Bear with me on this. I am coloring outside the lines again. But I think it's fascinating to consider on Topband. A few months ago, Scientific American ran an article about extremely directional spea
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-07/msg00019.html (7,980 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Extreme directivity (score: 1)
- Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@highmarks.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:18:36 -0500
- Once again you guys have proved to me that I should keep my day job and forget about my fascination for theoretical physics. The SciAm article producing the inspiration was in the May 2007 issue, pg
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-07/msg00028.html (10,302 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu