Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:g3lzq@john-dunnington.freeserve.co.uk: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: Topband digest, Vol 1 #497 - 16 msgs (score: 1)
Author: g3lzq@john-dunnington.freeserve.co.uk (John Dunnington)
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 18:12:12 -0000
Josef EA6ACC wrote ..! If someone uses cluster, and see a nice DX there, there are much more possibilities to get it than others without packet conection. Otherwise, if you have to find by yourself (
/archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00312.html (8,759 bytes)

2. Topband: RE: Topband Digest, Vol 14, Issue 31 (score: 1)
Author: "John Dunnington" <g3lzq@john-dunnington.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:47:06 -0000
VK6HD wrote: * >A new VU station on the band... Kumar... on 1833.1 at 2137z * Bill W4ZV wrote: FYI, a Russian friend told me Kumar is running 70 watts to a 10m vertical. We may need some great condit
/archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00249.html (7,727 bytes)

3. Topband: RE: Topband Digest, Vol 15, Issue 30 (score: 1)
Author: "John Dunnington" <g3lzq@john-dunnington.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:44:02 -0000
Rejection of perfectly valid IRC's is a serious matter for DX'ers. It is an international agreedment between all participating countries = that IRCs never expire, they must be honoured for exchange w
/archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00210.html (7,948 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu