Mail Archive Search: <+from:gm3poi@btinternet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:gm3poi@btinternet.com: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Coupling between bev and other antennas (score: 1): Author: gm3poi@btinternet.com (Clive GM3POI); Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:28:45 -0000; John don't you think that it was the 4 elevated radials that did most of the coupling in that case or do you think it would be just as bad using ground radials? Clive GM3POI -- Original Message -- Fr; /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00098.html (10,086 bytes)
2. Topband: Diversity receiving (score: 1): Author: gm3poi@btinternet.com (Clive GM3POI); Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 11:45:52 -0000; Tom W8JI said : "The solution is to run stereo diversity with phase-locked receivers." That is what I have been using here for the last 8 years using an FT1000D and feeding the Tx antenna in one ear; /archives//html/Topband/2002-07/msg00008.html (7,145 bytes)
3. Topband: Diversity receiving (score: 1): Author: gm3poi@btinternet.com (Clive GM3POI); Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 15:53:16 +0100; The FT1000D is fairly easy to put a modification in to switch the main Osc' o/p to both main and sub Rx. I use a miniature 5v relay to do the switching and have disabled the Dim switch which now cont; /archives//html/Topband/2002-07/msg00011.html (6,985 bytes)
4. Topband: XR0X-EU (score: 1): Author: gm3poi@btinternet.com (Clive GM3POI); Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 06:24:15 -0000; If anyone has the ear of XR0X, They were calling CQ EU beginning 06Z today just 6 minutes before the UK sunrise and saying no US before 0630. They plainly need to come on the band no later than 0500Z; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00218.html (6,246 bytes)
5. Topband: Let's try stuff (score: 1): Author: gm3poi@btinternet.com (Clive GM3POI); Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:21:08 -0000; Steve VK6VZ Said "That being said, for 95% of the time my inverted vee dipole at 90' outperforms my Marconi-T with a 20m vertical section over a full density 1/8 wave earth screen - to the amazement/; /archives//html/Topband/2002-02/msg00109.html (9,202 bytes)
6. Topband: Shorty Beverages (score: 1): Author: gm3poi@btinternet.com (Clive GM3POI); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:54:24 -0000; Larry. I think you want to try subtracting the termination end earth resistance from you likely Beverage Z and then terminate the antenna in that resistance. Because I use fairly short copper earth r; /archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00276.html (9,424 bytes)
7. Re: Topband: Propagation Between MN and Germany (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:06:22 -0000; Ford Peterson Said: "I have speculated that the transition point from oval to non-oval is critical--experiencing substantial attenuation. Perhaps it is an acute refraction as the signal passes from o; /archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00091.html (8,840 bytes)
8. Topband: Beverages over Radials (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:32:05 -0000; I'm not sure whether this subject has been aired before, but given that a Beverage needs ideally to run over lossy ground. Is it the collective wisdom that a Beverage running for a large percentage o; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00060.html (6,528 bytes)
9. Topband: Beverages over Radials (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:27:25 -0000; Thanks for all the comments, It seems there are Three views: 1. Don't do it. 2. Do it as it does not make that much of a difference. 3. Do it if you have no other way out. I'm thinking of a summer ti; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00075.html (7,689 bytes)
10. Topband: Beverage Noise pickup (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:37:57 -0000; Following on from Beverages over Radials I was considering Tx antenna noise coupled into a Beverage. If for example when putting 100W into a Tx antenna I get 1W into the Beverage Coax can I assume th; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00076.html (6,778 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Receivers, Noise Blankers and Key Clicks (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:20:25 -0000; Can any one offer a reason why we get the following differences between the MK5 and the Field: FT-1000MkV 69 100 Elecraft K2 66 115 TS-870 63 87 FT-1000Field 60 88 I was under the impression that the; /archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00058.html (9,545 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]