Mail Archive Search: <+from:gm3poi2@btinternet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:gm3poi2@btinternet.com: 53 ]

Total 53 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 259B (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:16:12 -0000; Has any one come across the problem of a 259B showing on switch on 0.000mhz for frequency and is the same on all bands. Is there any form of master reset that I can try?. 73 Clive GM3POI ____________; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00061.html (6,673 bytes)
2. Topband: Frequency Allocations (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:14:47 -0000; Hi, your figures for the UK are NOT correct The power level here is rated as ERP It RF at the antenna. ie 400W as applied to the antenna so it may well be 500w at the TX O/P.The same applies to above; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00234.html (6,873 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Frequency Allocations (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:48:39 -0000; Brett, Its power at the antenna NOT ERP or the power at the TX O/P. My first sentence should read NOT rated as ERP. Power above 1850 is 32W feeding the Antenna not the Coax. 73 Clive GM3POI -- Origin; /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00247.html (8,695 bytes)
4. Topband: Topband YJ (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:27:10 -0000; The picture from here to YJ is a lot different to the situation slightly farther east as I note that from both SP and OM the angle is 40 plus degrees. At my northerly location it is at 12 degrees mak; /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00091.html (6,838 bytes)
5. Topband: Interaction (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:37:54 -0000; I have an 80m 4SQ around my 160m Vertical and when I'm on 80 I short the 160 vertical to ground. I know that because my 160 vertical is top loaded that the loading wires interact with the 80m 4SQ. Co; /archives//html/Topband/2006-09/msg00046.html (6,894 bytes)
6. Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange? (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:20:17 -0000; I can see an advantage in using Q,L or H when calling CQ. If I was to come across a station signing /Q I would be much more inclined to make sure I worked him. Using power indicators in the exchange; /archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00014.html (7,759 bytes)
7. Topband: FO/JA8BMK (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:33:50 -0500; Does anyone know for sure where the above is located.? I've heard FO/A but I'm not sure. 73 Clive GM3POI _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00081.html (6,284 bytes)
8. Topband: Phased Verticals (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:22:25 -0800; Is there anyone on the reflector using 3/8 wave spaced 1/4 wave verticals. I have a couple of questions as I'm thinking of going that path here. 73 Clive GM3POI ______________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00040.html (6,385 bytes)
9. Re: Topband: Antenna Modeling needed 160 vertical (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:22:04 -0800; Hi Ed, I would make the antenna self resonant at 1.9mhz then adjust it using a hairpin coil across the feed point. You only really need to use two loading wires and I use Stainless steel about 2mm Di; /archives//html/Topband/2009-08/msg00105.html (9,625 bytes)
10. Re: Topband: Antenna Modeling needed 160 vertical (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:22:10 -0800; Ed I forgot to say use 1/4 wave radials and add to those 32 with time. 73 Clive GM3POI _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/Topband/2009-08/msg00106.html (6,987 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: Radial Wire Size (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:20:49 -0800; Steve, Your only consideration is mechanical strength because current will be divided by the number of radials. hence gauge not so important as an effective radial. 73 Clive GM3POI -- Original Messag; /archives//html/Topband/2009-09/msg00007.html (7,810 bytes)
12. Topband: K4M from Scotland (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:52:48 -0800; Hi All, This is my take on a welcome expedition to what is a very difficult path from the UK. For those situated further west K4M is at about 355 degrees azimuth, right through the Auroral zone. So i; /archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00294.html (8,136 bytes)
13. Re: Topband: Inverted L Dimensions (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:29:53 -0800; I would go further and say don't even bother with a tuner for a 2:1 SWR. Any PI network in an amplifier is capable of handling that 2:1 SWR. Just tune for maximum power transfer (Output). I would als; /archives//html/Topband/2010-09/msg00074.html (12,090 bytes)
14. Topband: Titanex V160E (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:58:01 -0800; Is there anyone on the reflector who has this version of the V160 and can let me know the diameters of each section going up from ground level. I assume some section diameters are repeated as the len; /archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00099.html (6,683 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: Propagation (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:44:08 -0800; An even better way to assess all software is to go back in your log and take Qs that you made and plug those dates and data into the software. you'll be surprised how many times the QSOs were impossi; /archives//html/Topband/2010-11/msg00099.html (9,397 bytes)
16. Re: Topband: Preferred Topband transceiver (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:10:48 -0800; I'd go further and add that the K3 version of APF in my view it is still a work in progress, as it still isn't as good as the original FT1000D. I find the K3 APF most of the time adds noise rather th; /archives//html/Topband/2010-12/msg00037.html (14,185 bytes)
17. Topband: was T30RH & Pile-up Decorum (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 08:09:31 -0800; Any expedition should choose operators based on capability and competence. If an expedition were to choose all the team from those who work by numbers, their would be uproar on the bands. In my view; /archives//html/Topband/2011-03/msg00056.html (7,286 bytes)
18. Re: Topband: Antenna Matching Question (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 07:38:05 -0800; Phil, Could you not remove the 60ft high guys for a test. Replace them with four copper radials that are then cut to resonate the whole array at 1830. Having found your new radial length introduce in; /archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00002.html (10,710 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: ARRL 160M Test Comments (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:18:00 -0800; Hi Jeff, That's the problem with the ARRL 160m from a European point of view. Jeff you get 5 points for working me , I get two points for working you, in the same Contest. A no brainer, which is why; /archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00139.html (8,225 bytes)
20. Re: Topband: E51M (score: 1): Author: "Clive GM3POI" <gm3poi2@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:44:56 -0800; Herb, Looking from an EU point of view. You will realise that the whole of EU will lose propagation at about 06z. You then have about six hours before sunrise , surely enough time. Our 160m available; /archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00016.html (10,613 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]