Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:goldtr8@charter.net: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Stew Perry 160 meter contest (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 19:35:41 -0400
Please lets send reminders for this contest next weekend. If I remember it I will play with a loading coil to get my 1/4 wave 80m vertical resonant on the top band. ~73 Don KD8NNU -.- -.. --.. -. -.
/archives//html/Topband/2013-06/msg00028.html (8,142 bytes)

2. Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 07:51:03 -0400
I am requesting opinions on what would work best for 160m based on a bottom loaded vertical or inverted L. I have in the past used and inverted L for 160m using a common feed with my 80m vertical. Th
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00118.html (7,346 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 08:13:12 -0400
Thanks everyone for all the replies. I guess that I will work on several things now for the next winter season. First is the standby length of wire to use as an inverted L which I used as a fan verti
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00163.html (12,381 bytes)

4. Topband: Time band may open tonight for Stew Perry (score: 1)
Author: goldtr8@charter.net
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:28:59 -0400 (EDT)
I have been listening on 160m this afternoon hoping to catch a local guy or two. I have not been on the air for weeks so I am wondering what time we might be able to hear signals on the band. I am in
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00151.html (6,683 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Control cable black conductors (score: 1)
Author: goldtr8@charter.net
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:21:23 -0500 (EST)
Lime away will clean it also . But you have to rinse the wire off to remove residuals. ~73 Don KD8NNU FH#4107 -.- -.. --.. . . ..- Hi and thanks for reading. I'm trying to splice a damaged (rodents)
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00377.html (9,222 bytes)

6. Topband: Not so ood in the contest last night (score: 1)
Author: goldtr8@charter.net
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:41:31 -0500 (EST)
I only made 35 contacts last night from my QTH. I did however get 5 new states and if those contacts use LOTW I will only need 5 more contacts for my WAS on 160m phone. My antennas are an inverted L
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00378.html (7,186 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Not so good in the contest last night (score: 1)
Author: goldtr8@charter.net
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:12:10 -0500 (EST)
Tod I think you hit my real problem yesterday. All the states that I was hoping to contact out west were doing S&P just like me. :-) Maybe I should try and sit still and just run one frq for once in
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00404.html (7,791 bytes)

8. Topband: AlexLoop in South Lyon Michigan (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 07:21:16 -0400
Dear Group I know that there is an AlexLoop in the South Lyon MI area that is at someones contest station. I lost the contact information for the person who has the station. (deleted a folder in my e
/archives//html/Topband/2014-09/msg00114.html (6,857 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: what happened to SP (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:10:22 -0400
I was going to post something about my experience this weekend. I logged a few short contacts and went to bed and got up at 1:00 AM Eastern time which was about 5:00 UTC. I head only local guys and t
/archives//html/Topband/2014-10/msg00098.html (7,896 bytes)

10. Topband: New RF interference killing RX at my QTH (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 12:33:10 -0500
Dear Topband Group, I need to make a noise finding antenna that I can take in my vehicle to look for a source of noise on 160m and 80m bands. My google searches have not yielded much information on s
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00026.html (7,784 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: New RF interference killing RX at my QTH (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:41:44 -0500
Well I made some progress tonight on the way home. I used my mobile rig with hamsticks to listen while driving on the way home from work. I tuned to 3.902 which is a very strong frequency that gets t
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00038.html (11,199 bytes)

12. Topband: receive antenna opinions (score: 1)
Author: goldtr8@charter.net
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:04:02 -0500 (EST)
Dear Group I have hit the limits of my antenna's and have come to the realization I am more TX than RX, which I guess is the norm for the topband and 80m. Anyway am considering putting a second recei
/archives//html/Topband/2014-11/msg00110.html (7,877 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: Boradband noise on 160 meters tracked down toapartmentcomplex (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:45:52 -0500
Hi Tom Thanks for your comments in the email below. I have a 80m noise that is from a local house source and your comments below have me thinking about how to implement a vertical noise sense antenna
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00261.html (12,744 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: SP test - Awful condx (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 15:15:52 -0500
I was driving all day to get home from holiday visits so I had a short SP for me. I needed CA and AK to finish my WAS 160m for CW and I did manage two CA contacts so hopefully they will confirm on LO
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00422.html (8,987 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: 160 Worked All States (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 21:02:50 -0500
I hope an AK contact that uses LOTW shows up and I can work them from MI. That would give me WAS on 160m CW. ~73 Don KD8NNU 2014 3905CC Top Gun :-) -.- -.. --.. -. -. ..- --Original Message-- From: G
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00056.html (11,201 bytes)

16. Topband: 160m WAS need AK via LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:25:38 -0500
Was AK on last night? I was still in bed with the flu and never got on the air. I will be getting on tonight but my target is AK as I need that state confirmed in LOTW to get 160m WAS confirmed. Than
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00211.html (6,942 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: WY and NV - got 'em! (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:44:26 -0500
WL7E was spotted about 11:30 UTC , I listened on the spott frequency till just before sunrise in MI and I never heard him. He was spotted multiple times on and others were making calls but they were
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00231.html (8,270 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Is self-spotting ALWAYS wrong? (score: 1)
Author: "Goldtr8 \(KD8NNU\)" <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:55:32 -0500
Contest its a no no and we all know that and it usually in the rules. But I am not a power station or a highly wanted call unless you want to work me because I am 5 miles from downtown Hell Michigan.
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00310.html (12,270 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: 630 Crossband Tonight (score: 1)
Author: goldtr8@charter.net
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:31:09 -0500 (EST)
Interesting split ~73 Don KD8NNU FH#4107 -.- -.. --.. . . ..- Just a reminder about the 630m crossband activity night this evening. There have been two updates to the plan: VE7SL will start one hour
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00426.html (8,058 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: 160 QSO K1N (score: 1)
Author: KD8NNU <goldtr8@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 09:09:48 -0500
All Time New One Thanks Don Sent from my iPad _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00461.html (13,402 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu