Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:herbs@surfvi.com: 152 ]

Total 152 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Topband crud (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:25:13 -0400
Quoting Garry Shapiro <garry@ni6t.com>: An nice LCD display monitor will make you a happy camper on 160. The price on eBay is very reasonable today. Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ ___________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00378.html (7,262 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Morning EU (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:59:01 -0400
Larry, I doubt very much if you had a direct path to RA4LW so a more easterly antenna would bring better results. I have found here in the Virgin Islands that Northern European stations do much bett
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00380.html (8,481 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: shunt fed tower - question? (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:15:16 -0400
Quoting "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>: Yes indeed Tony...the cage feed will increase the BW significantly. An easy way to make a cage is to just drop wire from the towers top guy wires using in
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00018.html (7,711 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: shunt fed tower - question? (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:41:45 -0400
To add to my earlier post the cage in my case is only supported by guy wires insulated from the tower. The wire skirt tap point in my case is at 41 feet with an A3 at the top of the Rohn 45 tower. I
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00021.html (8,208 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: shunt fed tower - question? (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:07:37 -0400
Quoting Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>: Indeed it is and I should have checked but many edirect eMails are asking to look at this. I have a printed copy of the paper which I will try to scan for
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00032.html (10,737 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: Building a practical vertical from Al tubing (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:58:20 -0400
Quoting "Richard (Rick) Karlquist (N6RK)" <richard@karlquist.com>: Rick, The heavy duty tapered aluminum supports used for shopping center parking lot lighting and street lights with the flanges on t
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00074.html (9,692 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: RM 11305/11306 (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:07:23 -0400
Quoting Jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@verizon.net>: split operation for international QSO's Split operation for rare DX-peditions may be good but as a general rule it is bad as it reduces available specturm
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00133.html (7,699 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: 1/4, 1/2 or 5/8 Wire Vertical Which to use?? (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:44:31 -0400
Quoting Richard Cariello <rcariello@si.rr.com>: Rich, Since you have a ground system to reference, the best and most stable balloon supported vertical IMHO would be the 1/4 wave, or even better yet a
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00161.html (8,452 bytes)

29. Topband: Fwd: Re: 1/4, 1/2 or 5/8 Wire Vertical Which to use?? (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:06:03 -0400
Quoting "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>: Guy, We are dealing with Maxwell's (1873) equations from the 19th Century which are still the holy grail of today's politically correct EE's. Atte
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00180.html (8,258 bytes)

30. Topband: Franklin Antenna Design (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:12:53 -0400
Quoting Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>: The baloon lengths has increaeed by curiousity in learning what prinicples are working here. Theoretically, very low angle radiation could be obtained by a ba
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00197.html (9,380 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: couple of things (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:51:18 -0400
Quoting Craig Clark <jcclark@wildblue.net>: He was on last night at about 2200Z with a 589 booming signal 1814.8 and QSX up 2. I did not work him as Larry was handling a huge EU pileup. He has repeat
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00268.html (7,076 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: CQ 160M Contest and a question about shunt feeding (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:25:59 -0400
Quoting Stan Stockton <stan@aqity.org>: Probably not because there are so many other factors like ground conductivity etc. If you have a good match fine...if your time is limited try a omega match so
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00285.html (8,037 bytes)

33. Topband: CQ Contest Conditions (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:39:08 -0400
Dear Topbanders, Although I was able to work more than over 60 countries (which means that Jeff VY2ZM got 120!) my Q-rate on 820 was way below the 1000 contacts that John KP2ZZ (G4RCG) did from my QT
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00422.html (8,611 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: CQ Contest Conditions (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:24:00 -0400
Quoting Rick Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com>: on receive. Nothing unusual on TX here except added a dozen 1/4 radials where radials were needed. The correct url for a picture of the antenna and qth
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00426.html (7,179 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: CQ 160 and DXwindow (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:52:12 -0400
Quoting Paul Kelley N1BUG <paul.kelley.n1bug@gmail.com>: OK That does it! Mea Maxima Culpa! I suffered with a low Q rate because I screwed up by respecting the Band Plan and not operating on 1.868! R
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00022.html (8,570 bytes)

36. Topband: Topband and the DX-Window (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:57:46 -0400
Quoting Paul Kelley N1BUG <paul.kelley.n1bug@gmail.com>: OK That does it! Mea Maxima Culpa! I suffered with a low Q rate because I screwed up by respecting the Band Plan and not operating on 1.868! R
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00023.html (8,356 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: 160 FROM GUANTANAMO BAY CUBA (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:23:30 -0400
Quoting N4BAA - Jose Castillo <n4baa@cox.net>: Jose, A good ground is not what you required nor necessary to make a Beverage play. One trick you might try in the future is to *not* ground the Beverag
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00048.html (10,738 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: 160M - sunt fed - broaden swr (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:58:52 -0400
Quoting "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>: Tony, Apart from the peak voltage considerations which would exceed 5KV at 1KW for some feed designs, ceramic caps in many cases have problems with handli
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00106.html (7,412 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: W1AW (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:17:58 -0400
Quoting Ken Claerbout <K4ZW@adelphia.net>: it's time they either fix the problem or suspend their bulletins on Topband until the problem is resolved.> IMO they need to realize that they have wiped ou
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00111.html (7,458 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: Topband and the DX-Window (score: 1)
Author: herbs@surfvi.com
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:57:16 -0400
Quoting Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>: Having been on topband for a long time, even back when the FCC had meticulous power regulations down to 25 watts in some areas, I would appreciate hearing the
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00157.html (8,506 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu