Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:hfdxmonitor@gmail.com: 105 ]

Total 105 documents matching your query.

81. Topband: KV4FZ FT8 (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:15:52 -0500
A remote TX in the CONUS? For the humour impaired: It was a joke. 160, but 80 also, seem to be on fire lately. HNY to all! 73 de Vince, VA3VF _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contes
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00003.html (6,452 bytes)

82. Topband: No comments. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:07:06 -0500
41/51 dB...and some say propagation is bad right now. This makes changing 17M QSLs to 160M so primitive. LOL The sad part is that it'll only get worse. 73 de Vince, VA3VF _________________ Searchable
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00008.html (6,148 bytes)

83. Topband: Possible 160m propagation indicator: lightningmaps.org? (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 16:08:47 -0500
Mike, Thank you for the post, very timely for me. I have been exploring the VLF and LF spectrum (RX only) for a few weeks now, after spending some time and money acquiring the capability. As far as h
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00050.html (8,170 bytes)

84. Topband: Possible 160m propagation indicator: lightningmaps.org? (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 18:06:46 -0500
Quiet conditions here as well. Contacts using JT9 are happening on 600M. Will monitor 160M. RX only. TX on Topband next year, if all goes well. 73 de Vince, VA3VF _________________ Searchable Archive
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00054.html (7,001 bytes)

85. Topband: FT-8 Contest would be great for Topband. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:11:33 -0500
The FT8 comet is back: 1) It's still legal; 2) It's still not mandatory to use it; 3) It only 'wastes' up to 3kHz on each band; 4) Lots of people are having fun with it. . . . I can think of so many
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00129.html (7,526 bytes)

86. Topband: New Group for Topband Digital. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:15:33 -0500
It's unfortunate that it has come to this, but I commend your initiative. That said, you can bet money that some of the same critics will join the new list to stir the pot there as well. 73 de Vince,
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00130.html (6,635 bytes)

87. Topband: FT-8 Contest would be great for Topband. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:25:49 -0500
How modern? Until getting an IC-7300 I used an IC-718. Before getting a Signalink USB interface to go with it, I used dubbing cables between the radio and the computer. Took some 'skill' not to TX g
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00134.html (8,364 bytes)

88. Topband: FT-8 Contest would be great for Topband (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:11:49 -0500
out soon ? I forget what it was to be labeled as. The current version of WSJT-X supports the following contests: NA VHF Contest; EU VHF Contest; ARRL Field Day, technically not a contest; RTTY Round
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00140.html (9,379 bytes)

89. Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:19:12 -0500
This is likely the only thing we agree on on this thread. The unethical use of remote receivers. And unfortunately, open to licensed hams only since last week. Talk about facilitating bad pratices! S
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00176.html (9,051 bytes)

90. Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 18:19:15 -0500
This does not make any sense at all!!! If the receiver is deaf, like 'door knob' deaf, fair enough, but it wouldn't be online. Well, you never know, hams are a 'funny' bunch after all. They would pu
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00181.html (8,236 bytes)

91. Topband: Remote receiver deafness. Was: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 19:56:14 -0500
I had private correspondence about this, so here is additional information. Some of these remote receivers do have 'bad' antennas, others not so. For 'local' reception, one does not need much. I have
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00182.html (7,877 bytes)

92. Topband: Remote receiver deafness. Was: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 21:46:24 -0500
Some actual data from my 'deaf' receiver. WSPR on 2200M: 2020-01-02 03:12 K5DNL 0.137491 -21 -1 EM15lj 5 VA3VF FN25 2163 52 2019-12-31 03:16 NO3M 0.137520 -24 0 EN91wr 1 VA3VF FN25 584 43 2019-12-31
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00186.html (9,771 bytes)

93. Topband: RBN and cluster spots. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 16:00:22 -0400
areas (like NA), so I have to put up with all the EU spots on RBN (which I'm not interested in) This is a 'limitation' with a lot of clusters, including RBN, AFAIK. Not sure whether they are the onl
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00100.html (6,842 bytes)

94. Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:33:08 -0400
Can you point to a place that sells them. I became a 'fan' of F termination, but have recently had second thoughts because of the bulkhead connector's quality. Thanks and 73. Vince, VA3VF __________
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00113.html (7,717 bytes)

95. Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:49:34 -0400
redesign the YCCC Hi Z amplifier using modern components and using similar mounting arrangements to our Loop Antenna Amplifier. Hi Chris, Any updates on the loop antenna amplifier revisions you were
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00116.html (7,433 bytes)

96. Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:07:10 -0400
Thank you very much, Lee. My last Mouser order arrived...today! On the list for the next order. LOL 73 de Vince, VA3VF _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Top
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00117.html (7,774 bytes)

97. Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:19:59 -0400
limiter for lightning and surge protection. It also has an optional (by internal link) diode limiter on the output so that it can be used by "weak" SDR receivers such as the SDRPlay RSP series that
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00120.html (7,978 bytes)

98. Topband: Any experience with 2N3553? (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:07:42 -0400
Don, Thank you for confirming the eBay part is not the same as the one sourced from Digikey/Mouser. I have a couple from eBay (at a $1 a piece I could not resist LOL), and a bunch from Digikey. The e
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00247.html (7,768 bytes)

99. Topband: DXCC Committe. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:31:29 -0400
For some reason the classic game Jenga comes to mind. 73 de Vince, VA3VF _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00273.html (6,082 bytes)

100. Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 14:11:15 -0400
opinion about the card. Why was an opinion needed? It was a DXCC accepted activation, was it not? Perhaps paper confirmation should no longer be accepted. Yes, collusion can easy beat any LoTW secur
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00278.html (7,745 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu