Mail Archive Search: <+from:k0ha@navix.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k0ha@navix.net: 162 ]

Total 162 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: receiving antennas (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 09:21:43 -0500; My number isn't a good one to use for reducing a point source of noise. Due to surrounding objects, the exact depth and azimuth of a particular null (to minimize a point source noise) can be inexact; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00141.html (8,780 bytes)
22. Topband: receiving antennas (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 14:43:15 -0500; Knowing the limitations of my number, I tried to come up with something better. Consider the following noise situations: from radiated lines that results in 45º arrival azimuth How does one numb; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00148.html (9,635 bytes)
23. Topband: Need advice: Hy-Tower on 160, and radials (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 17:48:21 -0500; I solved that problem in the past by using Teflon tubing instead of that supplied by HyGain. Teflon tubing of that size is not an inexpensive item, however. Moving the coil to the top of the wire (mo; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00154.html (7,641 bytes)
24. Topband: Re: Hy Gain Hytower (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:27:01 -0500; reported... With a base loaded HyTower with Teflon tower-top insulators and a kilowatt it took me about 15 months to work 100 countries on 160M from Nebraska. Later, after adding about 20 extra feet; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00158.html (7,297 bytes)
25. Topband: K0HA Pictures/Rig Comparisons (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 22:55:19 -0800; I just picked up an Icom IC-756PRO. While I still can I plan on making a detailed real-life receive comparison of that vs my Kenwood TS-870. I have two parallel short spaced (6') Beverages that are 8; /archives//html/Topband/2000-03/msg00034.html (8,798 bytes)
26. Topband: 160M Driven Element Pix (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 19:35:50 -0800; I told myself that once was enough, but then I thought that a couple more pictures of my driven element might be even more helpful than those already mentioned. The first shows the base of the 160M d; /archives//html/Topband/2000-03/msg00038.html (8,025 bytes)
27. Topband: IC-756PRO (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 18:58:14 -0800; The following is a comparison of my new IC-756PRO vs my TS-870. I'll try and deal with the things that concern topband use only due to the name of this reflector. The two were each using a different; /archives//html/Topband/2000-03/msg00056.html (9,706 bytes)
28. Topband: Re: IC-756PRO receive antennas (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 22:36:49 -0800; I wanted to go home to make sure that my marbles were intact. It doesn't have the loop because they came up with a better way. A normal push of the antenna button selects either the antenna continua; /archives//html/Topband/2000-03/msg00058.html (7,220 bytes)
29. Topband: Europe via Abnormal Path (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein); Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:57:57 -0600; I got on late last night after 0430z and found a pretty good opening to Europe with signals peaking on the phase settings of my Beverage combiners at the most extreme setting this year off of their n; /archives//html/Topband/2000-02/msg00047.html (7,099 bytes)
30. Topband: MFJ-1026 Test Figures (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 22:29:09 -0800; Due to my customizing two MFJ-1026 units I ran some tests on one today. A Fluke 96B Scopemeter provided the readings and a Wavetek 3000 Service Monitor served as a signal generator for a RF signal on; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00000.html (8,632 bytes)
31. Topband: ARRL 160 Contest from Nebraska (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 00:41:48 -0800; A delayed report on the contest from Nebraska. My results didn't seem to rate a report, but now that I hear from others maybe it merits some mention. Do to needing to be awake at work, I didn't have; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00080.html (8,087 bytes)
32. Topband: Folded Unipole vs Series Fed Vertical (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 23:22:05 -0800; Correcting an address typo on the NAB paper concerning folded unipoles vs. a series fed vertical, instead see: http://www.dlr.com/dlrweb/papers/nabpaper/Nabpaper.htm I recommend reading it! I am a li; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00124.html (9,837 bytes)
33. Topband: Vegetation/Housing Effects on Low Angle Radiation (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 01:06:18 -0800; Being up late has me thinking today... I wonder if there has been any study showing the effects of local vegetation (a surrounding forest to take an extreme) or concentrated city development on low a; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00125.html (8,105 bytes)
34. Topband: Vegetation/Housing Effects on Low Angle Radiation (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:29:49 -0800; While I haven't heard of any quantitative studies of this for AM broadcast or 160 meter frequencies, I did find at least some generalizations on this in a book that I already had! Sixth Edition" (19; /archives//html/Topband/1999-12/msg00153.html (8,156 bytes)
35. Topband: Using an MFJ1026 (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 21:13:47 -0800; Hi Richard, I have found my Beverages working well over the high ground conductivity in this part of Nebraska. However, it does so at the expense of losing some of its weak signal sensitivity. I purc; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00042.html (9,496 bytes)
36. Topband: MFJ-1026 comments (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 10:42:33 -0800; Generalizations based on things other than testing the particular product being discussed don't mean much. I'm a MFJ-1026 user who has no business relationship with MFJ, but I have performed many tes; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00047.html (11,260 bytes)
37. Topband: Bill's Back/Band's Back(?) (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 02:12:25 -0800; I think that I'm finally back on 160M for the season! Conflicts have prevented much operation prior to this. Plus, my receive antenna's are finally taking form... My Beverages to the east consist of; /archives//html/Topband/1999-11/msg00210.html (9,487 bytes)
38. Topband: Antenna Signal/Nosie (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 01:39:26 -0700; I'm wondering if there's any equation or computer software which compares the signal-to-noise ratio of two antennas under something similar to the following scenario: There is equal noise (eg static); /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00092.html (7,826 bytes)
39. Topband: Antenna Signal/Nosie (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 23:11:20 -0700; I thank those that responded. Consensus was that comparing directivity (gain with no antenna losses) would tell me what I was looking for. But I was uncomfortable with comparing the directivity of my; /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00123.html (10,124 bytes)
40. Topband: Antenna Signal/Nosie (score: 1): Author: k0ha@navix.net (Bill Hohnstein K0HA); Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 12:21:39 -0700; <199909251008.GAA26893@contesting.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-topband@contesting.com Precedence: bu; /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00135.html (10,450 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]