Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k0idt@arrl.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: RG-6/U & Snap n Seal connectors (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <k0idt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:32:35 -0600
With all this talk of proper RG-6 connectors I've seen nothing about the proper torque spec. You do know there's a torque spec I hope. I've put on thousands, yes thousands, of RG-6 and RG-59 connecto
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00334.html (10,034 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: The use of digital modes on 160 metres (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <k0idt@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:43:41 -0500
Finally some useful suggestions. The digital ops were only following accepted practice when they selected the area around 1838, top end of the cw segment, for a place to run. If all three IARU areas
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00194.html (9,837 bytes)

3. Topband: HF DF idea (was Steady Carrier on 80 CW) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Kolarik" <k0idt@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:51:23 -0600
I was just thinking a bit about the current DF problem with the 80m carrier. Since this seems to pop up from time to time would there be any interest in setting up a network of DF stations? The piece
/archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00097.html (7,148 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu