Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k0xp@k0xp.com: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: QRP on 160? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:35:21 -0700
"Minimum power" on my TS-890S or FT-991A is just under five (5) watts (actually, about 4.7 for both). Steve, K0XP Ken WA8JXM I accidentally made a QRP Q on 160 ... I had just moved and set up my stat
/archives//html/Topband/2024-07/msg00014.html (10,449 bytes)

42. Topband: N5J Live Stream? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 01:06:29 -0700
I would have sworn that a post about a month ago (perhaps from George) mentioned something about being able to look up exactly which operator was on what band at any given time, so that the island an
/archives//html/Topband/2024-08/msg00016.html (7,436 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: N5J (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 01:31:47 -0700
He'll be back on 160m again soon (probly 08Z or so), for the east coast SR as well as the JA SS (although he may QSY down the band for the JAs). I heard one of the HL3s say something about being rest
/archives//html/Topband/2024-08/msg00018.html (8,257 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: N5J Live Stream? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 10:22:02 -0700
I'm sure that George is doing the best that he can, with what he's got. With so many players in the game (including the non-ham scientists that accompanied them), it must be tough trying to keep trac
/archives//html/Topband/2024-08/msg00022.html (9,289 bytes)

45. Topband: Caribbean Operations On 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 18:46:31 -0700
Anybody know what the parameters or requirements for operating 160m from KG4/Guantanamo Bay are these days? Looking at my 160m worked list, I see that I'm missing one heck of a lot of Caribbean entit
/archives//html/Topband/2024-08/msg00049.html (9,447 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: OFF-Topic Now: Battery/Generator Shack Power for TopBand Systems (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:01:24 -0700
On 8/12/2024 10:54 AM, Jim Brown wrote: That's the kit. AG6EE, who's adapted many of George's ideas to the activation of rare grids on 6M, and even for moonbounce, turned me on to the EG4 integrated
/archives//html/Topband/2024-08/msg00057.html (13,143 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: Caribbean Operations On 160m? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:23:33 -0700
7127 would be just fine with me, as long's it's a REAL HUMAN working CW  8-D (that used to be below my Novice band some 59 years ago!) Steve, K0XP _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.co
/archives//html/Topband/2024-08/msg00062.html (9,981 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: Going OT (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 19:58:50 -0700
* I say this time because you would think the dog would have already learned. Out here in Yucca Valley-29 Palms-Wonder Valley, we have a number of rattler catcher-handlers who'll relocate rattlers gr
/archives//html/Topband/2024-08/msg00065.html (10,433 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: CY9C topband CW (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 08:52:59 -0700
As far as I could tell, they weren't on 160 CW at all last night, just digital on 1836. In contrast, they were copiable on 80m just about all night last night whereas before last night, I had to wait
/archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00001.html (9,209 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: CY9C big signal tonight! (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 20:49:43 -0700
Hopefully, they'll switch back to CW before long. Right now, I don't even see a trace of them on digital. I wonder what precipitated their simultaneous shutdown on 10/12/15m CW earlier this morning??
/archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00029.html (9,456 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: Promoting CW Activity. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:15:17 -0700
Geprge, we worked on 160 the other night but you seem to keep getting louder and louder; so maybe I'll call again some time when traffic is zilch  8-) However, last night, the QSB had very deep nulls
/archives//html/Topband/2024-09/msg00091.html (13,244 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: C21MM (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 11:14:02 -0700
Andy, *"First we will prefer CW."* We in North America (and probably South America, too) are NOT seeing this happen; rather, the great preponderance of both 160 and 80m activity from C21MM has been t
/archives//html/Topband/2024-10/msg00045.html (8,576 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: C21MM (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:07:05 -0700
On 10/20/2024 7:07 PM, Don Moman VE6JY wrote: I give more credit to A8OK - they had great CW signals out here in western Canada, night after night. Many locals worked them too. Especially strong AFTE
/archives//html/Topband/2024-10/msg00049.html (12,701 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: 160m DX Conditions (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@k0xp.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:29:41 -0800
George was showing S5 for awhile when I first called him around 0750Z, then rose to S9 on my meter. He peaked at 10 dB over S9 on that meter when I last heard him at around 0820Z or so. Too bad he co
/archives//html/Topband/2024-11/msg00028.html (9,199 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 54
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu