Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k1nz@arrl.net: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 11:17:22 -0400
Hi everyone, Here's my stance on awards such as DXCC and achieving them with digimodes such as JT65. Honestly, they're only worth the amount of importance you put into them. They're essentially made
/archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00050.html (8,403 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 18:11:58 -0400
Hi Len, So, you would rather me set up stations in W1 and work EU, W4 and work the Caribbean, W5 and work SA, and W6 and work Asia on SSB or CW instead of letting me work digimodes from my QTH in W1?
/archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00059.html (10,490 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: to JT or not to JT (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 10:35:00 -0400
The way I see it, do what you enjoy. That's what's great about this hobby. There are so many things you can do and digimodes and JT are just one of them. Here's an example for you guys. Warwick, E51W
/archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00111.html (8,217 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Digital on 160M stats (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 12:21:26 -0400
I'm not beating W1VT, but I'm at 32 worked on 160 digi. Nick K1NZ _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00141.html (6,772 bytes)

5. Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 10:17:34 -0400
Hi all, here's my $.02... Radio is what you make of it. Do what you enjoy. If you don't like the digimodes, stay away from them. DXCC means different things to different people. To some, it means onl
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00120.html (9,553 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 10:58:04 -0400
I just have one question about your suggestion about creating a "new" digi DXCC award and excluding JT/FT modes from mixed. Are those people (myself included) who have applied JT/FT credit to their M
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00206.html (9,004 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:10:17 -0400
Hi Dale, My comments were more aimed at the "let's separate FT/JT modes into their own separate DXCC category and disqualify them from Mixed" sentiment. I have no problem with the per mode style DXCC
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00208.html (11,648 bytes)

8. Topband: The Future of Ham Radio (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 01:03:19 -0400
Hi all, I apologize if this is not the place for this, but the recent FT8 discussion has gotten me to thinking. I'm one of the younger hams in the hobby. I got my license and extra at 20 and am 26 no
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00240.html (9,214 bytes)

9. Topband: Niceties (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:19:45 -0500
I recently saw a post come across the reflector that referred to FT8 as junk. If I were to call CW a junk mode or insinuate that it's bad in any way, shape, or form, I would have a mob of OM with pit
/archives//html/Topband/2017-12/msg00092.html (6,474 bytes)

10. Topband: Noise on 160 (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:48:04 -0400
Caught this interference around the FT8 freq. It's causing trouble from 1.8407 to 1.8417. Any thoughts? It sounds like a buzz and seems to zig zag over multiple minutes. https://imgur.com/SgXeJGx Nic
/archives//html/Topband/2018-03/msg00064.html (6,320 bytes)

11. Topband: Leaving (score: 1)
Author: Nick Maslon - K1NZ <k1nz@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 23:09:21 -0400
Hi all, While I have enjoyed many of the technical topics of the list, I have become rather annoyed by the blame that has repeatedly come across the reflector. From the FT8 arguments in addition to t
/archives//html/Topband/2018-09/msg00015.html (6,705 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu