- 1. Topband: Inverted ELL for 160M (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 21:32:14 -0500
- I've been wanting to try top band for a long time, and after scouring the books on my shelf and a few internet sources, here's what I've come up with (tentative) that will fit on my lot: The vertical
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00009.html (8,418 bytes)
- 2. Topband: Inverted ELL for 160M (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:09:13 -0500
- Many thanks to those who responded to my question with some good comments and ideas. Almost everyone said I should use radials on the ground rather than elevated, but I think I have to stick with the
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00027.html (8,268 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Phone band "center" freq (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 19:04:51 -0500
- Dumb question of the day: Would 1.865 be a good design center frequency for a phone band antenna? If not, what would be? 73, Jerry K3BZ _______________________________________________ Topband mailing
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00115.html (6,578 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Short Receive Antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 20:41:01 -0500
- Talking about "noise cancelling", what about the MFJ-1025 which claims to provide a "60 db null to wipe out noise and QRM" using a separate external receive antenna (maybe a beverage or a small loop?
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-12/msg00177.html (9,534 bytes)
- 5. Topband: A few beverage planning questions (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller - K3BZ" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:07:57 -0500
- I'm spending the winter devoloping a plan for my first attempt at getting on topband in 2005. I've been reading ON4UN's book, plus K1ZM's book with the photos of some of you. This topband reflector h
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00078.html (9,171 bytes)
- 6. Topband: A few beverage planning ANSWERS (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller - K3BZ" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 22:36:58 -0500
- Actually, I got more than a few answers, and they were very helpful. The most frequent suggestion was to check out www.w8ji.com/beverages.htm and I found that Tom Rauch W8JI has a huge amount of info
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00083.html (7,066 bytes)
- 7. Topband: Top Loading of Shunt-fed Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller - K3BZ" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:10:42 -0500
- I'm considering shunt feeding of a 45 foot freestanding tower with a 3L SteppIR on top for 160 and 80. The SteppIR is NOT electrically connected; the tower IS grounded,,, each leg has a 32 feet of #4
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00123.html (7,738 bytes)
- 8. Re: Topband: Technology "QSO's" (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller - K3BZ" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:13:53 -0500
- In his excellent book "The Complete DXer", no less an authority than Bob Locher W9KNI tells of getting phone calls from friends alerting him to new ones, giving him callsigns and frequencies. Bob cit
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00135.html (8,862 bytes)
- 9. Re: Topband: Technology Qso's (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller - K3BZ" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 20:22:58 -0500
- Bob VK3ZL wrote.... "Claiming DXCC CW using computer generated Morse Code TX-RX would have to be the ultimate fraud." Keyboard CW TX-RX is being done in most contests these days... apparently it's wi
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00141.html (8,291 bytes)
- 10. Re: Topband: Relays in *TX* array (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:20:18 -0500
- Rojer N1RJ wrote: " a vacuum relay such as the Jennings RJ-1A. They're fast, sealed, relatively inexpensive, " Relatively inexpensive? Not that I've seen, but maybe it depends on what you consider in
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00164.html (9,753 bytes)
- 11. Topband: Building an Inverted-L for Topband (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:53:05 -0400
- I now have space with two supports for an inverted-L and need some advice. The supports are 65 feet high and 100 feet apart, so that the horizontal component would point pretty much at EU (about 30 d
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00013.html (7,675 bytes)
- 12. Topband: Distance from tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:51:45 -0500
- Erecting a 160M balanced "T" with a 60 foot vertical component, how close to an existing 60 foot tower could the vertical component be placed without serious interaction? For the horizontal "T" compo
- /archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00191.html (6,712 bytes)
- 13. Topband: INV L Directionality (score: 1)
- Author: "Jerry Keller (K3BZ)" <k3bz@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:07:37 -0400
- Is an inverted L directional at all? If so, is it directional off the sides of the horizontal element? 73, Jerry K3BZ _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@cont
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00142.html (6,306 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu