Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3nd@yahoo.com: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: BC Band Energy Reject Filter (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:18:23 -0800 (PST)
There was some discussion awhile back on the BC band reject filter that has been described in the ARRL handbook for many issues. It's pretty well hidden in at least in the 1988 issue. It's under "HF
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00200.html (7,669 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: FT5XO reports (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:19:20 -0800 (PST)
Was out of town for five days over Easter weekend so no hunting on topband. FT5XO was nil in SE PA last night on 160, just a peep now and then. However, I did work them at 0044Z on 80M. With little t
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00268.html (6,884 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Alas, no joy in Texas (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 04:58:29 -0800 (PST)
No Joy in SE PA either. I could tell that they were "in there" last night but that was about it. The band was very noisy (QRN) which didn't help. The FT5 boys certainly did their job. They seemed to
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00276.html (8,511 bytes)

24. Topband: Low-Band DXing, Edition 4 is out (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:53:46 -0800 (PST)
Received my copy of the latest Low-Band DXing by ON4UN yesterday. I had ordered this book several weeks ago from the ATTL. In a quick scan through it, there seems to be a lot of new stuff (I have all
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00003.html (6,857 bytes)

25. Topband: Inverted-L Spacing Question (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:52:12 -0800 (PST)
This question came up recently in a conversation with one of the locals. He is considering installing a 160M inverted-L (wire) along side his 80M vertical (4 inch irrigation pipe). I'm thinking a spa
/archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00016.html (7,114 bytes)

26. Topband: Another Prediction for Solar Cycle 24 (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Another Prediction for Solar Cycle 24 at: http://www.sec.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/SC24/Press_Briefing_Biesecker.ppt#265,1,Douglas Biesecker __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!
/archives//html/Topband/2007-04/msg00135.html (6,637 bytes)

27. Topband: Low Dipole for RX (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Anyone using a low dipole on 160 for RX? By low, I mean 8-10ft. I could install one of these until some of the foliage dies off and I can install my two-wire beverage. Would this be useful or a waste
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00008.html (6,883 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: DX-Enginneering Active Antenna System (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 07:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
These short vertical RX arrays look really interesting. I'm wondering if anyone is using a 2 element end-fire version! I have room for a 2 element array here running NE/SW. It would also be 90-100 ft
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00030.html (7,595 bytes)

29. Topband: Low Band Monitor - Back Issues (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:38:34 -0800 (PST)
FYI... If anyone is interested in back issues of the Low Band Monitor: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280459280977&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT ______________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00070.html (6,913 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Staples (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Steve is spot on! I've made hundreds (if not thousands) if these things. You can make up a little cutting/bending jig and crank them out easily and quickly. 73, Stew K3ND ____________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00036.html (7,428 bytes)

31. Topband: 2-Way Splitter (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
I'm wondering what make/model of 2-way RF splitters are available that work at 1.8 mHz (actually 1.8 to 30 mHz). I have a RX control box project where I could use one, or more, of these. I'd like som
/archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00090.html (6,858 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Radio Antenna Engineering - Laport (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Laport's book is also available in PDF format. About 32MB. 73, Stew K3ND Nonsense.  For research purposes, just put up a balloon vertical on a calm day in some remote area.  Set up a transmit source
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00116.html (9,437 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: question about RX splitter (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
I've built a couple of these and they work great. 73, Stew K3ND This high performance 3 dB splitter kit is available from Clifton Laboratories for only $5.00 including first class postage within the
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00178.html (9,971 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: ant control (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 05:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
A couple of moth balls work good too.   73, Stew K3ND        A very effective and simple method of controlling ants in outdoor boxes is to place some pipe tobacco in the box Ants are smart enough to
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00214.html (7,077 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:34:14 -0800 (PST)
As Joe stated, if the rules do not appeal to you, don't operate. This is why I haven't operated in the ARRL 160 for years as it really is a 160M SS, and I've never found the "normal" SS to be all tha
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00531.html (9,580 bytes)

36. Topband: Fw: Tree Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
I guess then I will have to reposition my plastic owl to face true South. Gee, I wish band conditions were better! 73, Stew K3ND -- Forwarded Message -- From: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com> To: Raoul Coetzee <r
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00101.html (7,889 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Actually you could do a bit of both. With a bit of coil or an L-network at the base, you have some built in adjust-ability. It's a lot easier than taking the antenna up and down, maybe several times.
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00131.html (9,086 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: Insulator problems (score: 1)
Author: GALE STEWARD <k3nd@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 08:01:56 -0800 (PST)
The HN is a tough connector. At my former employer we used to run close to 2.5 KW thru them into fairly reactive loads. This was in the 130-180 Mhz freq range. I don't remember ever seeing one fail.
/archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00190.html (10,091 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 38
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu