Mail Archive Search: <+from:k6se at juno.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k6se: 594 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ juno.com: 299 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

41. Topband: Inrad 100Hz filter for the FT1000MP (revised) (score: 125): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sun Feb 9 15:53:22 2003; "Currently, my Yaesu FT1000MP is fitted with the stock Yaesu 500Hz crystal filter in the 8.215MHz IF and the accessory Collins 500Hz mechanical filter in the 455KHz IF. For very weak signal work, I a; /archives//html/Topband/2003-02/msg00051.html (7,797 bytes)
42. Topband: K6STI Loop (score: 125): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Tue Jan 21 20:36:45 2003; "I'm going to try K6STI receiving loop this weekend. Is anybody here who had an experience with this antenna? Does it work as describing in the 9'95 QST? Any hints?" == I tried one several years ago; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00178.html (6,721 bytes)
43. Topband: CQ WW 160m DX Contest Rules (score: 125): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Thu Jan 23 22:37:18 2003; I just read the complete rules of the contest. The thing I'm not too pleased about is eliminating the DX window. That means W6/W7 will have to listen through QRM and clicks in the window and elsewher; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00198.html (6,752 bytes)
44. Topband: CQ WW 160m DX Contest Rules (score: 125): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri Jan 24 06:06:46 2003; Regarding my comment about the elimination of the DX window in the contest: A prominent W9-land Topbander e-mailed me: "Yes ... I believe this is a disadvantange to all but the east coast." A promine; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00202.html (6,941 bytes)
45. Topband: 160m contests - what do you want? (score: 125): Author: k6se at juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon Jan 27 20:01:06 2003; I'd like to add my comments about the three "big" 160-meter DX contests - the areas of the world they favor, and their popularity. The first weekend of December each year is the ARRL 160m contest. Th; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00248.html (10,167 bytes)
46. TopBand: NEC-4 info (score: 9): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 02:57:46 EST; EZNEC (NEC2-based) was used to model a 160m elevated 1/4-wave vertical with 4 to 36 elevated 1/4-wave radials at heights from 10 to 60 feet above "good" (.004 S/m) ground. It was apparent from the mo; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00264.html (9,396 bytes)
47. TopBand: Re: EWE Info (score: 9): Author: k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham); Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 14:04:45 EST; == WA2WVL's design is quite appropriate for the "inverted-U" style of Ewe (two 10' supports), although I disagree with "396 + j7" -- the positive reactance is obviously an error. The elevation peak"; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00418.html (8,698 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 47
Page: [1] [2] [3]