Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k7tjr@msn.com: 263 ]

Total 263 documents matching your query.

121. Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:13:55 -0800
Hello Bob and all, Yes I agree on the issue of needing the stable impedance from the elements to drive the passive systems. I still have some questions in my mind about the radials and here is why. I
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00029.html (11,433 bytes)

122. Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 21:06:58 -0800
It was simply a system designed to find direction over a very wide frequency range. The multitude of elements increased bandwidth, but the physical width in wavelengths is the primary determinant of
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00044.html (9,724 bytes)

123. Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:39:35 -0800
Very interesting, In typical fashion our discussion has grown somewhat sideways. My original comment was that I coveted the Wullenwever. I did not say it was a high performance antenna or why I covet
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00056.html (9,816 bytes)

124. Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:24:06 -0800
This is being done commercially. Dual directions and dual bands. "http://www.hizantennas.com/asc.htm" Lee K7TJR OR _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00138.html (8,652 bytes)

125. Re: Topband: Topband Radial Question (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:26:37 -0800
One other consideration on radials above or below ground may be their effect on your receiving antennas. Lee K7TJR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00063.html (7,372 bytes)

126. Topband: another carrier (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:20:16 -0700
The 1810.8 carrier is S5 here in the a.m. and is slightly West of North of my QTH in central OR. Lee K7TJR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00181.html (6,411 bytes)

127. Re: Topband: another carrier (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:33:09 -0700
Preliminary look says somewhere around N7UA or Camano Island. I cannot remember the ham on Camano Is call. Anybody know either to have them check signal strength? Lee K7TJR I make it about 125 to 130
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00184.html (9,469 bytes)

128. Re: Topband: another carrier (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:14:18 -0700
Thanks Bruce. I already have contacted a couple friends in that area. By QRZ search of course. Lee K7TJR Try a QRZ search on zip code or city & state. Bruce-K1FZ _________________ Topband Reflector A
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00187.html (10,845 bytes)

129. Topband: another carrier (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:15:34 -0700
Tnx Tree, we believe this to be pretty close to the Lynnwood WA area. We have a few more bearings but it will be down to using a mobile setup now I think. It is remarkable to me how accurate some of
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00191.html (7,102 bytes)

130. Topband: carrier on 1810.8 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:48:50 -0700
OK, we now have a challenge for any hams interested in finding a stray carrier on 1810.8 MHz in the Seattle area. We have narrowed it down we think to an area enclosed by Shoreline Wa, Woodinville Wa
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00202.html (6,890 bytes)

131. Topband: 1810.8 carrier found. (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:52:00 -0700
I have been informed that the carrier on 1810.8 KHz has been found. I have been told it was a ham running QRSS where it takes 24 hours to send a CQ. HuH? I do not know the exact location or the party
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00224.html (6,502 bytes)

132. Topband: congratulations (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:12:08 -0700
Guess I did not Mention Dave's call is W0FLS Lee K7TJR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00237.html (6,656 bytes)

133. Topband: congratulations (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:22:38 -0700
OOPs Wrong Reflector SRI Guys Lee K7TJR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00238.html (6,661 bytes)

134. Re: Topband: 8 circle: DXE vs Hi-Z (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 20:09:12 -0800
The primary difference between DXE and Hi-Z 8 circle arrays is the fact that Hi-Z uses ALL 8 verticals actively at the same time where DXE uses only 4 at a direction. Using all 8 verticals allows the
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00265.html (10,311 bytes)

135. Re: Topband: 8 circle: DXE vs Hi-Z (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:52:57 -0800
Hi Guys, Excellent point Tom as we will have to disagree on this. I have built both types of arrays here and like the smaller circle with active elements. I believe it has a "cleaner" pattern. You ca
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00273.html (12,094 bytes)

136. Re: Topband: 8 circle: DXE vs Hi-Z (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:42:20 -0800
Excellent discussion John and Terry. Interestingly enough if you take the 8 elements in a 200 foot circle you can optimize the peak RDF to nearly 15dB. M.T. Ma in his book outlines his math to optimi
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00277.html (15,411 bytes)

137. Re: Topband: Non-resonant receive antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:39:18 -0800
Judging from my own observations and feedback that I get I would say that using a low dipole or horizontal polarity antenna would also depend on what Latitude/Longitude your station is located and ho
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00302.html (12,536 bytes)

138. Re: Topband: 4 sq TX or 8 el rx antenna on sloping ground... (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 18:58:22 -0800
Hello Gary, I struggled with this for some time and then one day it occurred to me to simply slant some verticals in Eznec at the angle in question. The only affect in reasonably small angles that I
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00435.html (8,808 bytes)

139. Re: Topband: 9 kHz heterodyne BCI (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:13:22 -0800
Greetings Bob, Having BC intermod on 160 meters has been a problem for a many years. It generally occurs from 2 or more of your 9KHz spaced BC signals mixing together and coming out on their spacings
/archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00463.html (9,639 bytes)

140. Re: Topband: 160 Worked All States (score: 1)
Author: "Lee K7TJR" <k7tjr@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 11:48:21 -0800
Tree lives in Boring Oregon. I.e. N6TR K7RAT one in same. Lee K7TJR OR N6TR and K7RAT are active in contests, and have great ears. 73, Jim K9YC _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://w
/archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00052.html (9,130 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu