Mail Archive Search: <+from:kamham69@gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:kamham69@gmail.com: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 23:24:39 -0500; The way I look at it, I got them on 80/160, so anything else is a bonus. There is still lots of time, so it might be best to wait for a day or two before looking for insurance Q's while Clublog gets; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00225.html (8,024 bytes)
22. Re: Topband: Yikes (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:36:18 -0500; Hi Buzz I guess I am confused. K1N had significant expenses, and expecting the operators to cover all the costs - including QSLing does not seem right. Despite that, they are offering a low cost way; /archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00551.html (10,671 bytes)
23. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:36:13 -0500; One really needs to look at the contest rules before deciding to not send RST. If it is the rules, please send it. A few years ago, there was a bit of a blow up on the CQ Contest reflector over this; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00127.html (11,596 bytes)
24. Re: Topband: K5P good job ! (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:27:00 -0500; The other (great) thing K5P was doing was sending the guys call, report, then repeating the call at the END of the report. This way - if the first part of his transmission is covered up, chances are; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00505.html (13,219 bytes)
25. Re: Topband: CQ 160 CW Contest (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:41:18 -0500; This came up last year, and I pointed out it is a game changer. A station can now operate full duplex by having a remote receiving site. A few folks indicated they came close to being able to do this; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00681.html (9,621 bytes)
26. Re: Topband: CW160 (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 13:30:27 -0500; This is only part of it. Just one example from a few years ago in a 160 contest; There was a very loud station in the Caribean, and he was running EU, and doing quite well. Many NA stations calling h; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00706.html (12,043 bytes)
27. Re: Topband: CW160 (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 16:58:33 -0500; One small request would be to NOT mention callsigns - at least during the 5 day "waiting period" for log submissions to be completed. Some folks may not be running assisted, may bust the odd call or; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00720.html (12,164 bytes)
28. Re: Topband: Am I the only one in step? (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:19:54 -0500; I think there is a few things that need to also be taken into account. A bandplan is designed for *normal* band loading. Clearly, when there is a contest on, we are NOT dealing with normal band loadi; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00160.html (11,047 bytes)
29. Re: Topband: Am I the only one in step? (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:54:51 -0500; Hi Roger Thanks for making me take a second look. For some reason, I thought ARRL had a 160 phone contest - they do not. My mistake. As it turns out - there is only ONE SSB contest - the CQ 160 SSB t; /archives//html/Topband/2016-02/msg00165.html (16,564 bytes)
30. Re: Topband: VK0EK confirmation (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 19:09:44 -0400; Hi Andy If it helps - I did not make an advance donation. Once I saw how well their web site worked, I made OQRS request, and received an LOTW confirmation shortly after. As I made additional QSO's,; /archives//html/Topband/2016-04/msg00115.html (10,294 bytes)
31. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:01:43 -0500; CQ supports the idea of an "X" QSO. Proper use is "X-QSO" You prepend "X-" to leave the QSO in the log so the other guy does not get a NIL, and you don't claim it as a valid QSO. That said, I am not; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00064.html (10,600 bytes)
32. Re: Topband: Dx'ing on the Edge - Numbered and Signed Copies Now Available fro US Topbanders (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:51:36 -0500; Hi Jeff You are right - shipping is more than the book... Will you be offering signed copies at Dayton per chance? My plan was to pick up a copy there. All the best in the New Year! Tom - VE3CX On Th; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00268.html (8,613 bytes)
33. Re: Topband: FT8 qrm (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:38:09 -0500; I think you are missing the larger issue here. It is not *just* 2.5 Khz out of 1800-2000. Consider that many folks have directional antennas that are cut for the lower part of the band - typically co; /archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00185.html (8,998 bytes)
34. Re: Topband: ARRL DXCC - 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 19:58:59 -0500; Neither of those calls show up in my log on any band. Tom - VE3CX _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00121.html (10,198 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 34
Page: [1] [2]