Mail Archive Search: <+from:kh7t at arrl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:kh7t: 3 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ arrl.net: 33 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: [Elecraft] Ten-Tec Orion (score: 176): Author: kh7t at arrl.net (John Buck); Date: Wed Jun 18 20:57:45 2003; Well, I never thought that I would post a message to rebut (sort of) a glowing report on the K2. My K2 is the best receiver I have had and does A/B better that my OMNI VI. But the my ORION is slightl; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00027.html (10,089 bytes)
2. Topband: Re: Weak signal receivers (score: 176): Author: kh7t at arrl.net (John Buck); Date: Thu Jun 19 19:57:08 2003; The context that I was using is that nonlinear front ends cause a lot of low level mixing products in the pass band in the presence of multiple large signals in the front end. A more linear front end; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00029.html (10,168 bytes)
3. Topband: Re: Weak signal receivers (score: 176): Author: kh7t at arrl.net (John Buck); Date: Mon Jun 23 17:43:02 2003; Tom, Thanks for the tutorial that helps to clarify the various sources of noise and interference. I absolutely agree with your conclusion that the goal is to be able to copy weak signals without arti; /archives//html/Topband/2003-06/msg00040.html (16,574 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]