Mail Archive Search: <+from:km1h@juno.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@juno.com: 316 ]

Total 316 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: 3B7RF on now (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 21:30:01 EDT; On 1826.5, worked at 0118 on 1831.2 He seems to be really trying, lots of QRZ and partial calls. Another hour to his sunrise. GL Carl KM1H ____________________________________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/1998-05/msg00054.html (6,914 bytes)
2. TopBand: 3B7RF on now (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 20:38:16 EDT; On Fri, 15 May 1998 16:49:02 -0400 (EDT) Bill Tippett <btippett@CTC.Net> writes: Bill, he called you many times over at least 45 minutes, sometimes with your correct call and sometimes with a variant; /archives//html/Topband/1998-05/msg00057.html (11,448 bytes)
3. TopBand: 3B7RF on again (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 20:51:45 EDT; Pee weak sofar and not working even many EU. The night is young so GL.. TX on 1826.5 and the best NA freq from last eve is around 1831.5. 73 Carl KM1H ________________________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/1998-05/msg00058.html (6,960 bytes)
4. TopBand: Rotuma (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 07:31:07 EDT; That was a poor frequency this morning. Right in the middle of the H40AA (who was on 1826.5) pileup. It would help if someone would let them know about the QRM and they might try 1831 or so. Tnx Carl; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00058.html (7,389 bytes)
5. TopBand: New concept for Lowband DX Receiving! (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 18:30:02 EDT; On Tue, 07 Apr 1998 09:53:15 -0400 (EDT) Bill Tippett <btippett@CTC.Net> writes: Go to an airport...they have been using the Adcock for more years than you and I have been around. Nothing new at all.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00083.html (8,407 bytes)
6. TopBand: CW segment (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 18:30:03 EDT; Has everyone missed the March QST editorial? In it was a request by the ARRL to the FCC to define "gentlemen agreements" , "band plans" along with other grey area issues. If the FCC upholds the band; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00084.html (8,377 bytes)
7. TopBand: 160m Beverage transformer core material? (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 14:14:16 EDT; Hi Tom, I know we have been thru this before a year + ago and we agreed on most...sounds like a new audience! I prefer to have a Beverage be useful at least thru 20M and have selected the FT114-61 c; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00093.html (8,368 bytes)
8. TopBand: High Input Intercept SMD Devices (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 16:02:37 EDT; I dont intend to get in an argument here....suffice to say that just reading the IMD specs is meaningless unless you can characterize the enviroment they are used in. Many small signal SMD devices ar; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00095.html (7,939 bytes)
9. TopBand: High Input Intercept SMD Devices (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 14:58:14 EDT; O W5UN w5un@wt.net Dave..the best preamp has 0 dB of gain on 160...just a LC tuneabler preselector if you are using a good Beverage. The ambient NF on 160 after dark can/is in the 25-35 DB range acco; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00112.html (8,329 bytes)
10. TopBand:What Is Bad SMD Devices or MMICs? (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 14:58:14 EDT; On Thu, 9 Apr 1998 08:03:07 -0600 "James R. Duffey" <ji3m@maxwell.com> writes: Yep... the You are missing about a years worth of discussion so confusion is understood. I equate SMD to mean "tiny" and; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00113.html (8,032 bytes)
11. TopBand: Andrew Heliax (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 15:38:10 EDT; I'll keep it short....contact me direct. I have many 7/8" and 1 5/8" Heliax runs available 200 to 500' . Tnx Carl KM1H _____________________________________________________________________ You don't; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00114.html (6,710 bytes)
12. FW: TopBand: High input intercept devices (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 14:58:14 EDT; Mike, I would love a copy of that circuit...can you point me in the proper direction? I have been using the ANZAC patented lossless feedback circuit since about 1982 which is also around the 2N5109..; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00115.html (8,511 bytes)
13. TopBand: Elevated Radials Test #1 (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 15:38:10 EDT; The following tests wer performed today. I am looking for any feedback...critiques on the methods. Freq: 1830KHz TX: TS940 at about 10W thru a 10dB Bird attenuator to minimize any VSWR problems. Feed; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00118.html (8,981 bytes)
14. TopBand: Rx noise figure (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 09:25:25 EDT; On Thu, 09 Apr 1998 19:39:03 -0500 Larry Higgins <n9dx@michiana.org> writes: Good question Larry. A properly transformered Beverage should not require a preamp. I really do not understand why some in; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00130.html (8,050 bytes)
15. TopBand: Elevated Radials Test #1 (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 13:26:09 EDT; The 2nd radial field is behind the test antenna as far as the RX site is concerned. The connecting wires are 130' long which is the base seperation between the antennas. If there was parasitic coupli; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00133.html (8,870 bytes)
16. TopBand: Big Rope Thinggy (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 09:05:20 EDT; On Wed, 15 Apr 1998 06:41:51 +0800 Steve Ireland <sire@omen.com.au> writes: Many moons ago I had a G5RV between two 70' pine trees. The antenna was made of #10 Copperweld and large surplus insulators; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00164.html (8,095 bytes)
17. TopBand: WTD: Ant. Compendium # 2 article (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 18:24:00 EDT; Would someone be kind enough to copy and send me an article in the ARRL Antenna Compendium #2 on coax phasing lines? I'm not sure of the title but it has to do with simple coax lines for phased verti; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00229.html (7,014 bytes)
18. TopBand: Receiver Test Data (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 13:13:51 EST; Similar to the response that I and others got last year Earl. I can offer SOME testing here on a drop it off and wait a week basis as I fit it in between real paying work! I have played with the curr; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00035.html (7,451 bytes)
19. TopBand: Topband Receiver Survey Follow-up (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 13:13:51 EST; On Mon, 02 Mar 1998 15:48:56 EST k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham) writes: SNIP I did a TS-940 test to the Sherwood format last year and posted the info on a few weak signal VHF reflectors Earl. The; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00036.html (8,354 bytes)
20. TopBand: Receiver survey (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Tue, 03 Mar 1998 13:13:51 EST; All the formulas, etc are available in most Engr manuals Peter. You can add any number of signals/amplitudes until you are into pure white noise generation. This is also what the CATV industry uses t; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00037.html (8,294 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]