Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@juno.com: 316 ]

Total 316 documents matching your query.

41. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 17:02:50 EST
On Wed, 18 Mar 98 16:07:29 -0500 John Kaufmann <kaufmann@ll.mit.edu> writes: I have not heard him say that....others I will have to discount as heresay. After all he is fully aware of this reflector
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00281.html (11,100 bytes)

42. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 11:52:40 EST
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998 18:53:18 -0700 Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account LOTS of SNIPS follow to preserve the peace. If ON4UN is to be believed the ratios are close to 1:1 with just a 90 degree phase shift
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00301.html (18,427 bytes)

43. TopBand: Shunt-fed tower (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:40:43 EST
On Thu, 19 Mar 1998 18:28:56 +0000 "Alex C.J. van Eijk" <DXIS@wxs.nl> writes: Alex; my own experience is that any interaction is minimal or unoticed as long as the tower and/or guy wires are not natu
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00307.html (8,260 bytes)

44. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 14:40:43 EST
To: <topband@contesting.com> But you said earlier that you have no experience with NEC-4...?? That was the ONLY program I asked about. I thank you for this but another constantly does run them down b
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00308.html (12,258 bytes)

45. TopBand: Sources of radial wire (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 10:26:27 EST
SNIP This is also excellent to use on tower legs while erecting. Even if not used as a shunt fed it makes disassembly much easier. Although off topic it also works well on telescoping elements and Cu
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00334.html (8,443 bytes)

46. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 10:26:27 EST
To resonate or not to resonate elevated radials? There seem to be 2 distinct camps represented here. I feel that I am sitting at the baseline of a tennis match! SNIP zone. Don't elevated radials giv
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00335.html (11,417 bytes)

47. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 14:44:50 EST
The above was NOT my statement; you have the authors confused. Carl KM1H _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Intern
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00345.html (9,591 bytes)

48. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 07:18:27 EST
On Sat, 21 Mar 1998 00:34:25 -0500 Larry Higgins <n9dx@michiana.org> writes: Tnx for the feedback Larry, The problem I would have at the remote end is getting an antenna that will radiate the few hun
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00358.html (9,680 bytes)

49. TopBand: Fwd: echo boundary="part0_890429296_boundary" (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 16:49:25 EST
On Fri, 20 Mar 1998 14:42:24 -0800 (PST) Robert Brown an the hillside, mountain or whatever. I am a Westerner, through and The only thing dense enough to the SW of Jeff would be Washington DC. ...Per
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00375.html (8,063 bytes)

50. TopBand: Remote signal source (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 16:49:25 EST
On Sat, 21 Mar 1998 11:27:14 -0500 Larry Higgins <n9dx@michiana.org> writes: Larry; But have not the assembled experts said that a dB at any angle is the same at any other when measuring the FS? If t
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00376.html (8,078 bytes)

51. TopBand: NL7Z - Longpath from NY? (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 16:49:25 EST
On Sat, 21 Mar 1998 08:01:00 -0500 Bill Tippett <btippett@CTC.Net> writes: Yours is the third reference to some form of ducting being at least possibly partially involved Bill. Was it not about a yea
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00377.html (8,621 bytes)

52. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 16:49:25 EST
Hi Denny, Dropping a full 1/4 wave wire from the neighbors tower would be the simplest....cheap....approach. I have no interest in building or buying mobile antennas since this is only a one time tes
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00378.html (9,953 bytes)

53. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 18:04:20 EST
To: <topband@contesting.com> I just want to simplify it enough so that others can benefit from the analysis. Why do you think it takes me years to get motivated? Since a W1 with 4 8877's went SK a ye
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00380.html (19,014 bytes)

54. TopBand: Low angle versus high angle (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 19:32:19 EST
And I cant even get into the 3rd tier with my 160' high inverted V Steve. I think Yuri is correct...it is too high. When I first moved here in 89-90 winter all I had was a V at 55'...worked 3Y5X on B
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00385.html (11,344 bytes)

55. TopBand: NL7Z - More to chew on? (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 21:02:28 EST
Jeff, I do not think that your experience is all that rare IF translated up to 80 and 40M. It is just the intensity of the phenoma that manifested itself so well down on 160. My own experiences on 40
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00387.html (7,616 bytes)

56. TopBand: Elevated GP vs. Vertical Antennas (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 21:02:28 EST
On Sat, 21 Mar 1998 17:07:47 -0600 philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements) writes: . IMO, it is also a given Well more than 6 maybe and less than 60. At least if you are satisfied for all but that last
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00388.html (13,370 bytes)

57. TopBand: Vertical V Dipole (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 17:01:01 EST
On Sun, 22 Mar 1998 21:46:30 +0800 Steve Ireland <sire@omen.com.au> writes: Steve, do you know what your ground conductivity is? Just what is ur QTH like? Do you have a theory why a low V works bette
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00411.html (7,641 bytes)

58. TopBand: Delta Loops. (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 17:01:02 EST
On Sun, 22 Mar 1998 00:58:13 EST k6se@juno.com (Earl W Cunningham) writes: What about the above over 1mS/m ground Earl? That is what I have here. I have heard that those antennas require some very to
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00412.html (10,927 bytes)

59. TopBand: shunt-feeding towers and elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 18:48:00 EST
I cant name one person who knows it all....welcome to the mix. He is plenty loud here at all times! Do you know the ground conductivity? The BW should be excellent at the 90 degree point but feeding
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00414.html (10,227 bytes)

60. TopBand: Remote signal source (score: 1)
Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 12:24:26 EST
Eric and others... It appears that I will have several points of reference for the tests. A few may alternate between RX and TX as a further test of performance. At the QRP level would not a Beverage
/archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00427.html (8,873 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
This search system is powered by Namazu