Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@subich.com: 199 ]

Total 199 documents matching your query.

101. Re: Topband: Digital mode spurious issues (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:05:12 -0500
No, Joe Taylor's protocols are not capable of operating in LSB. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 12/30/2013 5:59 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: The simplest technical solution would be for the digital mode
/archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00279.html (10,300 bytes)

102. Re: Topband: Digial mode spurious issues (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 17:51:52 -0500
For the same reason the SSB guys insist on using 1840-1850 ... with their significantly smaller band (1810-1850 in some cases) Region 1 put digital between CW (1810-1830) and SSB (1840-1850). With wh
/archives//html/Topband/2013-12/msg00309.html (8,187 bytes)

103. Re: Topband: Digial mode spurious issues (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 22:56:09 -0500
JT65 and JT9 are single tone at a time modes and are designed to be operated with class C amplifiers - as is common in EME operation. ALC is not an issue but improperly adjusted sound cards (clippin
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00001.html (64,535 bytes)

104. Re: Topband: Digial mode spurious issues (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:32:55 -0500
While we call these digital modes, they are really baseband audio transmissions run through SSB transmitters. They are subject to all the dynamic range problems and limitations of SSB transmitters pr
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00021.html (11,679 bytes)

105. Re: Topband: Digial mode spurious issues (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:11:10 -0500
More and more are starting to do so with the Freescale modules - they are certainly *not* linear at 1200W from a single module. Maybe a pair will handle 1500W and be linear - I haven't seen a full se
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00025.html (67,044 bytes)

106. Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160??? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:42:32 -0500
I have yet to hear about a ham who had 120 buried bare radials underneath his two raised radials. ON4UN's original 80 meter wire 4-square hug around his 160 meter tower came close to that description
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00178.html (12,966 bytes)

107. Re: Topband: Anyone purchased the ARRL book on Short Antennas for160??? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:41:40 -0500
It would be interesting to see the same modelling over nonconductive "rock" earth. I suspect once the soil gets bad enough that there is essentially no electron mobility the "ground plane" (elevated
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00203.html (15,158 bytes)

108. Re: Topband: Short receiving verticals question (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:42:32 -0500
Doesn't faze the deer around here. They come right up to the house and the fenced kennels and munch on whatever they like. That stuff may do something with the small animals but the Eagle, Great Hor
/archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00367.html (9,755 bytes)

109. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:26:14 -0500
N6LF has done quite a bit of actual testing of various in ground and elevated radial systems. See: http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/ K3LC has done extensive modeling of both in ground and elevated radia
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00201.html (9,352 bytes)

110. Re: Topband: Still in search of resonance (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:44:26 -0500
Absolutely! Treating the Sky Needle and the #12 wire as a folded dipole and using 8" for the diameter of the tower, you have a 16:1 step-up with the single #14 wire. If you made a cage of 4 or 6 wir
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00234.html (11,416 bytes)

111. Re: Topband: Not so ood in the contest last night (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:06:10 -0500
The worst part was I did not hear the South Lyon Group who was running W1AW/8 and they are only 10 ish miles away from me. Maybe tonight :-) Don't worry about them ... they've been an alligator on 16
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00397.html (8,733 bytes)

112. Re: Topband: The guy who Sells AIM Products Responds (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:44:22 -0500
Lets set this record straight. Jan over at SDR kits is a friend, and I met with him in Germany as well as Dr. Baier. He and I agreed that the patent is possibly infringed in the USA that Bob Clunn de
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00449.html (7,667 bytes)

113. Re: Topband: AM broadcast tower and 160m dxpedition (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:10:23 -0500
73, ... Joe, W4TV In the past, I have seen some of these AM tower efforts ruined by lousy receive conditions. I suggest you get an advance team out to the site to check out the noise level etc. and
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00455.html (9,154 bytes)

114. Re: Topband: AM broadcast tower and 160m dxpedition (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:07:47 -0500
2. In December of this year, I am organizing a small group to go to Haiti and participate in the 160m contest. (this of course is dependent on the tower being built.) December and 160 meter contest
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00460.html (11,696 bytes)

115. Re: Topband: ARRL Board Requests Member Comments About Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 18:37:37 -0500
IMO, digital should go below 1810, AND it should preferably be a narrow band mode such as the superior JT9 mode. Unfortunately, "below 1810" is never going to fly because of the lack of access below
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00017.html (11,120 bytes)

116. Re: Topband: ARRL Board Requests Member Comments About Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 20:08:55 -0500
Mike, - Since two-thirds of the world --including North and South America-- starts at 1800, why not consider region-specific band plans? Is digital popular in other places? Put it this way - if you w
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00019.html (12,162 bytes)

117. Re: Topband: ARRL Board Requests Member Comments About Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:21:18 -0500
Although they do not specifically ask for an allocation on 160 meters, their principle of 15% of every amateur band located the preferred spectrum for common access across all three regions is clear
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00032.html (12,876 bytes)

118. Re: Topband: ARRL Board Requests Member Comments About Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:37:50 -0500
I'm sure there are some military/commercial systems that will do it but I don't believe that even the Flex are clean enough to handle the really wide band commercial data modulations. 73, ... Joe, W4
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00044.html (9,278 bytes)

119. Re: Topband: ARRL Board Requests Member Comments About Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:24:30 -0500
Yes - for the rich yachtsmen who buy ham tickets and then use the Winlink/Sailmail stuff in the amateur bands rather than pay for expensive maritime data service. There is none except to enrich cert
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00046.html (11,274 bytes)

120. Re: Topband: New MFJ 259C available (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:32:58 -0500
... and looks like a couple other locals at 1010 and 1060. 73, ... Joe, W4TV 73 Tom Tom, Apart from the N2PK analyzer, I don't know any published selectivity spec. The detector minimum res. bandwidt
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00067.html (12,361 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu