Mail Archive Search: <+from:lists@subich.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@subich.com: 199 ]

Total 199 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:45:32 -0500; It is much like billionaires making rules for the middle class and working poor. It's also like those who don't pay income tax deciding how much those who pay income taxes should pay and how those ta; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00171.html (9,266 bytes)
82. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials Questions (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:20:12 -0500; I also found the 2005 thread "tuning elevated radials" on this reflector quite informative. One thing that stands out is that I may be better off with more than 7 shorter than 130' radials. Note - if; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00360.html (11,149 bytes)
83. Re: Topband: Length of 'T' Top Hat wires? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:23:01 -0500; Many times the top hat wires are not horizontal but come down at an angle like the top set of guy wires on a tower or vertical. The 25% rule says the ends of the top hat wires should not extend more; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00370.html (8,629 bytes)
84. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:08:10 -0500; Herb, Calling KP2 and KP4 DX for the ARRL 160 Meter Contest would mean that you *could not work DX.* You have bitched for years that DX thought the could not work you - I can find the references in t; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00507.html (10,294 bytes)
85. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:11:35 -0500; ARRL 160 meter contest is based on *Sections*. KP2 and KP4 are *SECTIONS* as are South Florida, North Florida, West Central Florida and any other section. It makes no earthly sense to change the rule; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00510.html (12,271 bytes)
86. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:05:04 -0500; ARRL 160 Meter contest is essentially a 160 Sweepstakes that allows W/VE stations to work DX. If you don't like the format of the contest, don't work it ... after all, there were no VE8, VY1, etc. s; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00516.html (12,100 bytes)
87. Re: Topband: alternative to vacuum variables (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:28:21 -0500; One way around this is to use multiple shorter sections in parallel. One can also use series/parallel arrangements of fixed "doorknob" capacitors to obtain the necessary voltage/current rating to pa; /archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00190.html (9,334 bytes)
88. Re: Topband: VE3DO Loop (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:33:18 -0500; For anyone who wonders, the 180 degree phasing was chosen because it was dead easy to implement, was not fussy with respect to matching, and gave the highest RDF at the expense of a little F/B. Simpl; /archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00142.html (9,638 bytes)
89. Re: Topband: "New beverage" (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 13:38:42 -0400; Electronically both directions are "full length" ... I suspect the design is similar to the one shown about half way down the page here: http://kw2p.blogspot.com/2010/08/kw2p-beverage-antenna-designs; /archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00092.html (7,457 bytes)
90. Re: Topband: [ARRL-LOTW] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:46:44 -0400; Symbol Rate Rule Modernization On the motion of ARRL West Gulf Division Director Dr David Woolweaver, K5RAV, on behalf of the Ad Hoc Symbol Rate Rule Modernization Committee, the Board directed ARRL; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00045.html (10,159 bytes)
91. Re: Topband: [ARRL-LOTW] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:47:09 -0400; Symbol Rate Rule Modernization On the motion of ARRL West Gulf Division Director Dr David Woolweaver, K5RAV, on behalf of the Ad Hoc Symbol Rate Rule Modernization Committee, the Board directed ARRL; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00046.html (9,690 bytes)
92. Re: Topband: Symbol Rates (was: BoD votes LoTW initiatives) (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:40:12 -0400; I don't have a problem with removing the symbol rate language ... but I'd rather that symbol rat remain that give carte blanch for automatic 2.8 KHz wide noise generators t fire up anywhere they want; /archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00057.html (9,975 bytes)
93. Re: Topband: Blame it on global warming (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:52:56 -0400; Global warming is a very disputable "fact" and certainly "bad science". While average temperatures are certainly higher than during the great ice ages they are still much lower (as are CO2 levels) t; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00031.html (10,148 bytes)
94. Re: Topband: and KDKA (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 10:56:08 -0400; Looking at the table of allocations over the years, WLW was the only station in the continental US that did not share its frequency with any other US station *at night*. It was a "class 1A" station w; /archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00210.html (9,661 bytes)
95. Re: Topband: Antenna switch rating for high SWR? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:57:58 -0400; I know that T/R switches inside amps are fairly small in physical size, however they are designed to operate into a fairly low SWR load. I have no idea of what rating of a DPDT switch I would need (p; /archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00168.html (9,465 bytes)
96. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 23:51:46 -0500; I would think that very high in the band, above 3575, would make a LOT more sense. No - above 3600. 3570-3600 is packed full of digital/RTTY operations. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 11/8/2013 7:22 AM, Lennar; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00140.html (9,801 bytes)
97. Re: Topband: DXCC Desk? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:14:29 -0500; The DXCC Desk is still the ARRL Awards Manager (e.g. NC1L) supported by several clerical assistants. The Awards program is located within the ARRL MVP (Membership and Volunteer Programs) Department w; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00269.html (24,948 bytes)
98. Re: Topband: DXCC Desk? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:47:05 -0500; Len, Why, you might ask after all this suffering, is that this nation still is not recognazid as a separate entity to this very small world of the global assembly that Ham radio really is? Ask the Se; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00272.html (28,680 bytes)
99. Re: Topband: DXCC Desk? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:55:56 -0500; Herb, Get your "facts" straight ... the issues you raise happened in the main more than 20 years ago. The latest DXCC rules revision "DXCC 2000" has greatly simplified (and removed the subjectivity); /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00274.html (12,735 bytes)
100. Re: Topband: DXCC Desk? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:46:57 -0500; Unfortunately "BS Reef" is one of those pre-1998 "countries" that continue on the list in spite of not meeting current criteria. On the other hand, I would not object to simply deleting any entity th; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00280.html (14,127 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]