Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mark.k3msb@gmail.com: 77 ]

Total 77 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Clean Sweeps in ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 17:54:13 -0500
3830 Scores -> Contest Summaries is one source, but it's not official http://3830scores.com/listeditions.php?arg=B6cgaWz5a3 73 Mark K3MSB _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.con
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00034.html (7,636 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: 1809.2 kHz constant dashes (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 19:14:21 -0500
Both the original and remake are great flicks! 73 Mark K3MSB It's a Coke bottle on a Morse key and flapping window blind in San Francisco. (For you youg'uns, check out On the Beach on Netflix.) 73 de
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00126.html (9,192 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Improving condx? (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:05:03 -0500
I am in PA, not out west, but I managed to work 60 EU stations last night (Wednesday night / Thursday morning). For my small station, this was absolutely huge and completely unexpected!! This was the
/archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00142.html (9,644 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 08:25:57 -0400
Well said Victor. I'm going to offend with this email no matter how nice I try to make it, but I am trying to not be inflammatory. Here goes.... A human ear can not compete with a computer that extra
/archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00041.html (10,628 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:29:35 -0400
The issue is not one of any mode being more "valid" that the other, nor is it one of a QSO being "valid" or "invalid" based upon the mode. If a two way exchange is completed between two legally licen
/archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00122.html (16,362 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:40:40 -0400
Because I use my human skill that I developed over years to decode the CW signal. You don't do that for RTTY. Unless of course you're referring to using a CW decoder wherein you just read the decoded
/archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00125.html (9,511 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Top Band and JT65 (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 18:28:54 -0400
On the contrary Cecil; I think that due to the fact that this long-going thread has not had people ejected from the list nor has had intervention by the moderator shows that all of us are indeed tryi
/archives//html/Topband/2017-05/msg00130.html (10,711 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Some Operating Observations from JT5DX de K1ZM/VY2ZM (very long!) (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 13:12:27 -0400
GREAT Report Jeff! Enjoyed it immensely! 73 Mark K3MSB _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2017-06/msg00012.html (28,333 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: FT8 - the end of 160m old school DXing? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:17:04 -0400
As Ive said before, I dont believe its a case of FT8 being good or bad for ham radio. The problem is a level playing field for competition purposes. Personally, I dont believe statements such as Your
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00151.html (10,451 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: A way forward to keep 'old school' modes vibrant alongside FT-8? (long) (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:27:54 -0400
You cant retract any awards, and I dont believe you even have to worry about that. Lets say you have 150 Confirmed on 160M right now using a combination of SSB, CW, FT8 etc. The current single band a
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00216.html (10,641 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: FT8: Making it too easy? (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:12:31 -0400
Hi Vince Well, you could use a machine gun instead of a bow and arrow to bag the big one and hang its head on the wall, but it wouldnt be quite the same, now would it? Whats the difference in rolling
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00218.html (8,255 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: FT8: Making it too easy? (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:02:31 -0400
Only if they used a credit card and a remote station that they didn't build! 73 Mark K3MSB Hi Mark, So, if I use the same 'rational' some people here seems to use, those DXCC awards earned with full
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00220.html (9,808 bytes)

33. Topband: 3C1L Information (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:38:41 -0400
October 26 - Update 20:30 GMT Plans regarding 3C1L have changed. Yuris is in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea and he says that they plan to activate 3C1L again. He is looking for proper QTH. But they are n
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00227.html (6,736 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: future of ham radio (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 15:27:44 -0400
The "Delete" key is a wonderful thing. Just because you don't like a discussion thread doesn't mean others feel the same way. Nobody is forcing you to read anything you don't want to. I've been conte
/archives//html/Topband/2017-10/msg00284.html (12,018 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: FT8 qrm (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:17:52 -0500
Out of curiosity, exactly who "established" 1840 + 2.5 KHz as the FT8 "window"? Mark K3MSB I shall be operating this weekend full legal limit *below* 1837.5 CW, and also FT*/JT65/JT9 at up to the le
/archives//html/Topband/2017-11/msg00188.html (10,587 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: Good Conditions or Just Activity? (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:14:28 -0500
Hi Roger I would suspect activity. This weened during the CQ WW CW contest our club worked 86 countries on 15M. We were running 100W into a 3 element beam. Nice openings to Africa and a delightful lo
/archives//html/Topband/2017-12/msg00006.html (9,423 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:40:03 -0500
Hi Marsh I agree. This is a basic technique and Ive used it for decades. While stations butt heads on the zero beat frequency I transmit 100 to 200 Hz above and usually make the contact. During the A
/archives//html/Topband/2017-12/msg00043.html (10,634 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: E31 (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:26:00 -0500
Hi Steve I noticed the same thing. The pileup was considerably wider, but he typically stayed within the 1 to 2 KHz up slot. I had my bandwidth set to 1.2 KHz when I switched to his RX frequency, and
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00240.html (8,145 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: 160m DX Activity Night (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:20:04 -0500
So what's the accepted practice of working stations again and again on 160M? If I've worked you once or twice in the past I won't answer your CQ, unless you're CQing with no responses, but then proba
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00292.html (7,564 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: 160m DX Activity Night (score: 1)
Author: Mark K3MSB <mark.k3msb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:12:38 -0500
Don I read your post with some interest and dismay as something similar happened to me last November A lot of times I do not have my PC up and running in the morning before work; if I make a contact
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00300.html (9,178 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu