Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mike@wa9pie.net: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: New entry to TopBand with antenna question (score: 1)
Author: "Michael G. Carper" <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:06:10 -0400
Hey folks. I've been a ham for 37 years, but I've spent my entire ham "career" on 80-10m (with the exception of 7 countries worked on 160m about ten years ago). For the most part, the same obstacle h
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00018.html (7,883 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: New entry to TopBand with antenna question (score: 1)
Author: "Michael G. Carper" <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:01:00 -0400
Okay... great responses all. Here's what I think I'm gonna do... I'll go vertical with an inverted L. I'm thinking to be resonant around 1.825MHz, I'll need about 128.2' of wire. I'll go up about 70'
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00032.html (10,275 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: New entry to TopBand with antenna question (score: 1)
Author: "Michael G. Carper" <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 22:59:50 -0400
Pardon me for asking a dumb question... but how do you guys switch between the beverage antenna and the inverted-L... given that your XCVR has only a single antenna port for both TX/RX? Mike, WA9PIE
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00047.html (10,997 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: New entry to TopBand with antenna question (score: 1)
Author: Michael Carper <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:52:46 -0500
With everyone's advice, I thought I'd send a quick note to thank everyone and let you know what I ended up doing. I put a 160m inverted-L together. I have 130' piece of 10-gauge wire up. Probably 80'
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00098.html (8,765 bytes)

5. Topband: Radials - a point to ponder (score: 1)
Author: "Michael G. Carper" <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:53:57 -0500
When I sent out a recent email about the 160m inverted-L I was finishing with four ¼ wavelength (130?) radials, I got a few responses back indicating that I should cut them in half and double them. S
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00107.html (7,277 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Ahh, the mystery of top-band (score: 1)
Author: "Michael G. Carper" <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:30:37 -0500
I'm with you, Mark. Previous to this weekend, I had made exactly 69 contacts on 160m in the past 37 years. I had worked 7 DXCC countries. Having confirmed 100 on every other band under 30 MHz, I figu
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00266.html (8,611 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Michael G. Carper" <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:58:03 -0500
On the point of being zero-beat with the station you're calling... you almost need to run CW Skimmer for that here. I called a station - exactly zero beat... and a station just below me was answering
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00038.html (10,240 bytes)

8. Topband: Converting a full-size G5RV to a T for 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Michael G. Carper" <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:09:11 -0500
Hey guys. I saw a few items in a Google search where guys had converted their full-size G5RV into a T antenna on 160m. It had something to do with adding the obligatory counterpoise and shorting the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00299.html (6,812 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Converting a full-size G5RV to a T for 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Michael G. Carper" <mike@wa9pie.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:17:12 -0500
Thanks for all the replies. I've also found this article by AD1B in CQ from 1995 to be helpful. http://techdoc.kvindesland.no/radio/antennas/20061010171110285.pdf Thus far, the (102') G5RV is up at a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00306.html (8,932 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu