Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mstangelo@comcast.net: 160 ]

Total 160 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: SDR and the use of "AUXILIARY CHANNELS" for DX (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
Greetings, I agree. I've been following this thread. the problem is not with SDR technology but with the operators. I enjoy the challenge of operating HF (and 160 MF) because I can communicate with s
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00075.html (9,633 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: [Fwd: Re: Question for the EXPERTS and Heavy Transceiver users and testers] (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:00:56 +0000 (UTC)
All, I've been enjoying this discussion of "non-competition-grade" transceivers. My base station radio is a K3 but I do lots of operating on the road and on trips and am looking for a small transceiv
/archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00011.html (10,107 bytes)

23. Re: Topband: Results summary of preferred CW transceiver (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 13:29:33 +0000 (UTC)
Dennis, Please keep in mind that in the event of a failure replacement parts may be hard or even impossible to come by. The TS-850, while an excellent performer, has had issues with their DDS chips a
/archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00033.html (11,311 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: Web SDR's and 'Cheating' (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 20:48:54 +0000 (UTC)
Why should the general listener be punished because of some cheaters. A delay is not necessary; we just need ethical contesters. This is also no worse than contesters who use DX clusters or DX spots
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00033.html (8,795 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: The 16th Stew Perry TopBand DX Challenge (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:51:10 +0000 (UTC)
The correct procedure is that the faster operator should slow down to accomodate the slower operator. 73, Mike N2MS Hi Folks: I'm a slow CW op (less than 10 WPM). Would it be worth my time to partici
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00223.html (8,617 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: Best small space antennas (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 02:37:28 +0000 (UTC)
Guy, I'm looking at your antenna at W0UCe's website: http://www.w0uce.net/K2AVantennas.html Does the sections of the folded counterpoise have to be separated from each other or can they be adjactent
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00144.html (11,392 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:40:24 +0000 (UTC)
I was taught to contact the station personally and notify him of the problem tactfully. Don't broadcast your gripe. Try to contact him (or her) and send an accurate signal report, such as 579K. Remem
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00251.html (9,815 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: Need some Ferrite cores for common mode choke (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:03:51 +0000 (UTC)
I get my cores from Mouser Electronics. They have a good good selection of 31 and 43 solid toroid and snap on cores. They have expedited shipping. http://www.mouser.com/catalog/catalogUSD/644/1062.pd
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00263.html (7,382 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:24:00 +0000 (UTC)
What radial length does the FCC requirement stipulate for the 120 radials? Quarter, half or a full wavelength? How did they come to this decision since Brown, Lewis and Eppstein used 0.4wl? Mike N2MS
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00121.html (10,232 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Laird ferrites (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 15:20:13 +0000 (UTC)
I agree with Chuck, Laird, formerly Steward, is an established magnetics company. Jack Smith of Clifton labs uses them in some of this designs. http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/easy_broadband_trans
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00247.html (8,315 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: Lightning makes antennas vanish (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:46:57 +0000 (UTC)
Tom, I don't know if tunderstorms are more violent but this has been a very hot summer. Storms are more violent in the south. Did you live in Gerogia in the 60's and 70's? How do your small vertical
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00123.html (8,664 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Mother of all ferrite common-mode coaxial chokes (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:31:24 +0000 (UTC)
Tom and All, I also use phono connectors on some older radios. I'd prefer to substitute BNC connectors but I don't want to modify the equipment. What I find helpful is to squeeze the shell of the plu
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00157.html (10,510 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: FCP model (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:19:00 +0000 (UTC)
I think a more relevant question should be "is there a better or simpler elavated radial arrangement that can fit into the 66 foot linear space that will radiate more effectively than the FCP design"
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00005.html (7,009 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: ITINERANT 160 M ANTENNA PROJECT (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:47:14 +0000 (UTC)
Bill, Since this is a temporary installation you do you get some thin insulated wire and lay 30 to 60 radials on the ground. You have to carry more wire but you won't have to worry about supporting e
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00039.html (8,279 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: TB digital (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:53:06 +0000 (UTC)
Tom, I problem is the IARU region 1, 2 and 3 band plans do not line up. The region 1 160 band starts at 1.810Mhz so the IARU Region2 pansis useless for DX digital communications. All regions should a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00132.html (7,849 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: The use of digital modes on 160 metres (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:29:47 +0000 (UTC)
All, I feel the issue is that the band plans for the three regions are not aligned, especially region 2. Since CW is still a popular mode of communications for this band I propose three regions shoul
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00181.html (10,428 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: DXCC Fairness (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:36:46 +0000 (UTC)
Jim, You can't have your cake and eat it. The West coast has nicer weather than the East coast but the left coast ocean is larger... Maybe there should be an award based on Grid Squares. Mike N2MS Ta
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00186.html (7,746 bytes)

38. Topband: Dog fence parameter radial wire (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:29:01 +0000 (UTC)
I have an inverted L in the trees of my back yard with 30 radials. The length of the radials is 70 feet since this is what I could fit into the existing area. I lay my radials on the ground since the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00277.html (8,771 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: Fishing beacons redux (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
Is this the correct thing to do? How do you know that the beacon user is breaking the law in his jurisdiction? In any case jamming should not be proposed as a solution. Amateur radio operators should
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00049.html (10,137 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: Fishing beacons redux (score: 1)
Author: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:48:39 +0000 (UTC)
Calling on top of a CB'er is just make the situation worse. Some of them want to spar with hams. I don't want to preach but two wrongs do not make a right... Mike N2MS IF they are operating there ill
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00055.html (10,080 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu