- 1. Topband: IC-756pro2 A/B Test Results (score: 186)
- Author: n1eu at hotmail.com (Barry N1EU)
- Date: Wed Aug 13 08:50:35 2003
- Like many topbanders, I'm also very interested in the differences between receivers in their ability to pull weak cw signals out of the noise. Although I appreciate Earl's efforts in this regard, a q
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-08/msg00068.html (7,933 bytes)
- 2. Topband: ft1000 mp vs omni 6+ (score: 186)
- Author: n1eu at hotmail.com (Barry N1EU)
- Date: Tue Jul 15 08:23:05 2003
- FWIW, at this QTH the FT-1000MP was significantly more immune to blocking from very strong signals on the band than the Omni VI+ One's choice of "the best 160 rx" certainly depends on the signal leve
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-07/msg00061.html (7,080 bytes)
- 3. Topband: TenTec Orion questions regarding SO2R suitability (score: 186)
- Author: n1eu at hotmail.com (Barry N1EU)
- Date: Thu May 8 16:43:42 2003
- Eric, Ten-Tec's stated goals for the Orion's "Instant Two Radio Mode" differ from the goal you've read into the new radio (quoted above). I've never seen Ten-Tec claim that the Orion would do full S
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00057.html (7,781 bytes)
- 4. Topband: XQ6ET (score: 186)
- Author: n1eu at hotmail.com (Barry N1EU)
- Date: Mon Feb 10 22:25:18 2003
- During a short 20m cw qso, Bob mentioned that he has an inverted L up now, is active daily on 1822khz from 0930-1000Z and should be installing an amplifier for 160m next week (100w till then). 73, Ba
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-02/msg00055.html (6,542 bytes)
- 5. Topband: Contest Problems (score: 186)
- Author: n1eu at hotmail.com (Barry N1EU)
- Date: Wed Jan 29 05:51:09 2003
- I routinely run up against dynamic range limitations of any of the commercially available rigs in day-to-day operation on topband. If a manufacturer offered a rig that included a very competently de
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00266.html (8,476 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu