Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4zr@contesting.com: 269 ]

Total 269 documents matching your query.

121. Topband: Thanks for AM BCST Help (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:40:25 -0500
Thanks to everyone who pointed me to the FCC broadcast station database, and particularly to the feature that returns bearings to your particular location. It makes this job a lot easier! 73, Pete N4
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00218.html (6,553 bytes)

122. Re: Topband: gamma match a tower (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:53:02 -0500
I second this motion. My 31-meter tower has a 40m yagi on top and two tribanders at 31 and 21 meters, but the real kicker is that I have a 4 x 80m lazy-vee dipole array, fed through coax that foes up
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00236.html (9,475 bytes)

123. Topband: RX power splitter (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:44:41 -0500
I am looking for a passive hybrid splitter that would let me feed two receivers from a single source with losses as small as reasonably possible, and good isolation between output ports, without reso
/archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00036.html (6,612 bytes)

124. Topband: RX Splitters - thanks! (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:35:49 -0500
Thanks for the many detailed responses and suggestions. 73, Pete N4ZR _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00047.html (6,180 bytes)

125. Topband: RX Splitters - summary (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:38:12 -0500
By popular request, a brief summary. Many people suggested DX Engineering, KD9SV and ICE splitters. Others suggested Minicircuits, which makes a variety of splitters rated 1-100 MHz. Also favorably m
/archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00051.html (7,859 bytes)

126. Re: [Antennaware] New K9AY Observations (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:29:37 -0400
In my experience the choke at the loop end of the feedline (before the transformer) is essential - the signal levels coming from the loop are so low that it doesn't take much shield pickup to fill in
/archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00099.html (10,623 bytes)

127. Re: Topband: Choke baluns (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:09:59 -0500
You might also take a look at the two-choke design in recent editions of ON4UN's book (the one that has the shield grounded between two strings of beads about 15 feet from the matching transformer, w
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00144.html (8,045 bytes)

128. Re: Topband: Shunt Fed Question (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:07:42 -0500
A little related experience, maybe. My tower is 97 feet, with two tribanders and a shorty-forty on it, plus a 4-dipole lazy vee array for 80M which is fed by feedlines that enter the tower at about t
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00086.html (8,727 bytes)

129. Topband: First Europeans heard yesterday evening (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:28:52 -0500
I thought people might be interested in the first Europeans and Atlantic island stations heard here yesterday evening in the half-hour before 2200, in full sunlight. I was using an SDR-IQ RX and CW S
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00272.html (7,898 bytes)

130. Re: Topband: Receiving beacon on 1836.36 kHz (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:15:00 -0500
In the same spirit, since I will not be operating after dark in the upcoming ARRL contest, I will put my SDR-IQ/CW Skimmer combination on 160 meters all night (US East Coast, GMT+5), reporting what i
/archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00116.html (8,272 bytes)

131. Topband: RX antenna switching (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:34:35 -0500
An elementary question but -- If I want to switch a topband RX antenna among three radios, can I just use an ordinary rotary switch, without special attention to maintaining impedance, etc. 73, Pete
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00003.html (6,498 bytes)

132. Topband: thanks for RX antenna advice - and one more question (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 06:54:05 -0500
Thanks to the many topband denizens who responded to my inquiry. I have one related question. KD9SV, who knows a lot about receiving antennas, cautioned "I would just make sure to switch 'both sides
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00008.html (7,379 bytes)

133. Re: Topband: Receive Splitter or Not? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:44:23 -0400
It depends ... (helpful answer, right?). For example, I have had various SDRs connected to the RX antenna loop on my two transceivers. One of them did not load the RX inputs at all, while my current
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00070.html (8,281 bytes)

134. Topband: Probably-dumb question re current mode chokes on RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:12:22 -0400
I think I understand that common mode chokes are important on small loops and other low-output receiving antennas, in order to prevent signals being received on the shield of the feedline and passed
/archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00073.html (7,894 bytes)

135. Re: Topband: Beverage Feed Line Choke Installation (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:55:40 -0400
I understand that low-output RX antennas like flags, pennants, and various loops need more common mode suppression than Beverages. I wonder if two of those chokes, with a ground in between, 10-15 fee
/archives//html/Topband/2009-06/msg00002.html (8,954 bytes)

136. Re: Topband: Beverage Feed Line Choke Installation (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:11:53 -0400
DXE's pricing is a clear example of charging what you can get, rather than some reasonable multiple of manufacturing/marketing cost. I was startled by their Dayton display showing all the DXE gadgets
/archives//html/Topband/2009-06/msg00003.html (8,824 bytes)

137. Re: Topband: Beverage Feed Line Choke Installation (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:06:10 -0400
What I intend to do shortly is use spectrum analyzer software and an SDR-IQ to look at several different alternatives. Still eyeball, but at least it's the whole band at once. I'll be testing the ON4
/archives//html/Topband/2009-06/msg00023.html (8,592 bytes)

138. Topband: Common mode chokes (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:16:23 -0400
I thought readers here might be interested in some crude experiments I have been doing here with a Clifton Labs active antenna and various common mode choking schemes. It's conventional wisdom that s
/archives//html/Topband/2009-07/msg00003.html (7,848 bytes)

139. Topband: "Center-tapped" common mode choke (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:49:45 -0400
Apologies for being less than clear - the choke that gave the much better results was built on the inspiration of ON4UN's low-band DXing book, 4th edition, figures 7-88. A length of RG-59 coal is use
/archives//html/Topband/2009-07/msg00006.html (7,548 bytes)

140. Re: Topband: Common mode chokes (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:33:27 -0400
These are fair points, Jim. One of the purposes if this series of tests is to see if Clifton Labs' super-duper center-tapped choke, which combines 2 different wound cores on each side of the center g
/archives//html/Topband/2009-07/msg00009.html (9,834 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu