Mail Archive Search: <+from:n7ex@athenet.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n7ex@athenet.net: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. TopBand: Inverted L questions (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1998 12:46:41 +0000; If you have a good ground (probably at least 30 radials) you will probably need something like a 1:2 or 1:2.5 current balun to get a better match as the impedance of the inverted L with a decent grou; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00087.html (9,758 bytes)
2. TopBand: Stew Perry Distance Challenge (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:43:49 +0000; That's an easy one !!!!! The software you want is TRLog!. Course the father of TRLog and The Stew Perry Distance challange are one in the same. N6TR no surprise there! Both the software and the comnt; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00141.html (7,412 bytes)
3. TopBand: de JY8ZW (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 13:17:31 +0000; On another note related to JY8ZW on 160 last night (Saturday night local). JY8ZW was pretty widely reported on packet as being on 1822. Another station appeared on the freq. signing (very infrequentl; /archives//html/Topband/1998-11/msg00092.html (8,556 bytes)
4. TopBand: Beverage question (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:14:48 +0000; The Multi-path was definitely in here in the Mid west this morning when listening to the T32 for an hour an half (he was S8 at my peak). At times he was stronger out of the NW and other times he was; /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00139.html (8,824 bytes)
5. TopBand: Re: Propagation Question (WAS: inverted vee, ladder line fed) (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 20:10:14 +0000; Bill One of the consistent features of 160M propagation is that sometimes a difference of only a few hundred miles can make BIG difference in propagation of stations heard and worked. One day its Ala; /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00174.html (8,537 bytes)
6. TopBand: Inverted-L (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 19:39:19 +0000; 1) Absolutely no balun required, this is not a balanced feed antenna. 2) 170' is a little long, 135' would be more like it and probably a 2:1 UNUN transformer to match it to 50 ohms, or if you make i; /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00176.html (8,161 bytes)
7. TopBand: new Inv-L (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 04:13:11 +0000; Scott I am currently using a 55' high Inv L on 160 it performs "adequately" but not as good as the 90' one I had at my previuos QTH. I have run Inverted L's as low as 35' on 160 with average results.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-09/msg00080.html (7,534 bytes)
8. TopBand: Any sig into the Black hole yet? (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 00:05:27 +0000; Well Mel..... Time to get out your sulphur powder and the Off for those chiggers cuz160 DX been happening in 9 Land (cental Wisconsin) for weeks now. 8/30 CE 9/3 DL 9/19 KH2 9/23 ZL 9/23 KH6AT was 10; /archives//html/Topband/1998-09/msg00157.html (7,402 bytes)
9. TopBand: Inverted L Improvements (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 22:42:37 +0000; Been doing just that for years. Since most Inverted L's have Zo of around 15 to 30 ohms at resonance(depending on height of the L and the effectiveness of your ground). Lengthen the antenna till the; /archives//html/Topband/1998-08/msg00120.html (7,884 bytes)
10. TopBand: AEA Complex Impedance Analyzer (and MFJ) (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Sat, 20 Jun 1998 09:56:36 +0000; 1) The Autek RF-1 has the same problem by the way. 2) Does anyone know if the the new AEA unit also has the same susceptability to external (AM broadcast band) signals? Even at $350 , I'd buy one if; /archives//html/Topband/1998-06/msg00050.html (8,046 bytes)
11. TopBand: Re: Measuring impedances through a filter (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 21:33:19 +0000; Pete et all The above approach will work (all though I'm not sure I'd call it quick) as long as you "believe" you are dealing with a purely resistive load. If you assume that the impeadnce being meas; /archives//html/Topband/1998-06/msg00077.html (9,330 bytes)
12. TopBand: Dayton topband dinner (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 04:53:01 +0000; Somebody pass me the details on the when (Friday night?) and where the topband dinner is at Dayton this year, There was some discussion a few months back but I didnt save it and haven't seen anything; /archives//html/Topband/1998-05/msg00049.html (6,649 bytes)
13. TopBand: Rotuma (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 12:08:51 +0100; The op at H40AA figured it out pretty quickly and changed his QSX to 1833. I suspect that 3D2WC was pretty loud at H40. Two new ones in log for me and well worth the 3 hours sleep and 4 hours of wait; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00063.html (7,929 bytes)
14. TopBand: CW segment (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 12:24:28 +0100; Tom The last time this went around as I recall over 70% of the respondents replied that they favor a dedicated CW sub band for 160M. Of course there was some debate about where the upper end should b; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00065.html (8,259 bytes)
15. TopBand: Linear loading (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 20:24:44 +0100; <snip> Pattern distortion yes ......... "meaingful gain" not likely. Dave K9NX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative requests: topba; /archives//html/Topband/1998-04/msg00156.html (7,053 bytes)
16. TopBand: More musings on Beverages (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Tue, 06 Jan 1998 02:31:33 +0000; After my recent move this summer from Spokane,WA (one of the great radio black holes) to a new venue just south of Green Bay, WI ( a lesser back hole..trust me!) I finally got around to putting up th; /archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00056.html (9,357 bytes)
17. TopBand: Re: thoughts on Beverage Performance (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 11:40:20 +0000; 1st idea: USA signals may not be coming in from the direction you think they are! The only way to tell would be to have a couple more beverages NE/SW , NW/SE and N/S and then switch back and forth. S; /archives//html/Topband/1998-01/msg00278.html (8,279 bytes)
18. TopBand: Re: VS6DO (was 3x) (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 05:27:25 +0000; Earl and company "Rumor" had it that VS6DO was running something far more subsatntial than a pair of 3-500's to put out that very very big signal we all used to listen to on 80 and 160 back in the mi; /archives//html/Topband/1997-12/msg00203.html (7,474 bytes)
19. TopBand: Autek RF-1 Antenna Analyzer (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 22:41:22 +0100; The Autek works really well on 160......as long as there are no strong AM broadcast stations near bye. If there are strong AM stations near bye they overload the instrument and you will get bad readi; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00049.html (8,243 bytes)
20. TopBand: regarding condx (score: 1): Author: n7ex@athenet.net (Dave_K9NX); Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 04:11:45 +0100; Dave et all Same here in the upper midwest (WI) . Could here the west coast knocking em dead and not a peep here most of the time. As a recent transplant from the left coast ( old call N7EX) I can te; /archives//html/Topband/1997-10/msg00099.html (7,400 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]