Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nekvtster@gmail.com: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Simulating the conical monopole (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Machesney" <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:54:53 -0500
Does anyone have experience simulating a conical monopole? I'm using EZNEC. As a starting point, I'm simulating Figure 61 in the second edition of Paul Lee's (N6PL -SK) book, "The Radio Amateur's Ver
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00255.html (7,333 bytes)

2. Topband: Simulating the Conical Monopole (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Machesney" <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 07:40:21 -0500
I surmise from some other reflector postings that older editions (e.g., 12th?) of the ARRL Antenna Book have dimensions for conical monopoles. If someone has an olde edition on hand, can they please
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00293.html (6,899 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Multiple Ground Systems (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Machesney" <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 13:15:20 -0400
Forgive my ignorance, as I am not an antenna engineer. I apologize for a long post, but I would like to hear the opinions of the professionals on the line. Between jobs last year, I spent nine months
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00058.html (9,058 bytes)

4. Topband: Operating with separate TX and RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Machesney" <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:44:34 -0400
Now that the snow has melted up here in the taiga, it's time to add a separate RX antenna. I'm considering a Waller Flag and have a question concerning how to use it inside the local environment of m
/archives//html/Topband/2008-05/msg00004.html (7,025 bytes)

5. Topband: VK9ANU QSL? (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Machesney" <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:53:40 -0400
Hello, Gang, Did anyone else work VK9ANU? If so, did you get a QSL? Masa-san said he would QSL upon returning to JA, but my SASE has gone unanswered and I can't find an email address for him. Any hel
/archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00080.html (6,936 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Not so Boring QSO (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Machesney" <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:11:45 -0500
Tree, I had a similar experience on 15 November. I had never heard UA0 before, but worked RZ0AF at 11:21Z (near my sunrise) and then again at 21:41Z (near my following sunset). Also, I worked JA for
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00115.html (7,007 bytes)

7. Topband: Topband "woodwork" (score: 1)
Author: nekvtster@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:04:49 +0000
It's 0400Z and the pileup for K5D is showing what this band is really made of. With nothing more than a "double L" vertical, I'm hearing awesome signals from all over EU - several of which I need for
/archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00124.html (7,061 bytes)

8. Topband: Tower-attached guy wires - max length for driven tower? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:31:55 -0400
I'm putting up 80 ft of Rohn 25G with various antennas on top and may decide to drive it as a monopole on 80 and/or 160 at some time in the future. Since stubs of wire attached to a radiator can affe
/archives//html/Topband/2009-03/msg00087.html (6,990 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: S04R no waiting?? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:49:47 -0400
Well, we have been lucky in the North then, for a change. I worked V51AS around 0500Z on 11 Apr 09 and S04R around 0600Z on 15 April 09, right around their respective sunrises. I feel like I'm usuall
/archives//html/Topband/2009-04/msg00041.html (7,538 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: How do we get more people on Topband? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:50:45 -0400
Does anyone else see a pattern here? To me, it looks like "Marconi" to "DeSoto" to "lots of real estate" to "suburban high tech topband guerilla." I think this would be a fascinating subject for a we
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00227.html (9,104 bytes)

11. Topband: T32RD and 5K0T QSLs (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:44:01 -0500
I received T32RD QSLs via the Bureau. I also received T32RD and 5K0T QSLs via ARRL LotW. The T32RD LotW QSLs showed up in April 2008, long after the operation. The 5K0T QSLs LotW "arrived" in March 2
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00197.html (7,575 bytes)

12. Topband: Vermont QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:27:52 -0500
For those who need VT for WAS but didn't work a VT station in CQ WW 160 last weekend, I will operate from my home station as W1MOO this weekend (48 hrs beginning Feb 6 / 0000Z). I plan to make VT ava
/archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00046.html (6,819 bytes)

13. Topband: +12V T/R sequencing of ICE 184A preamp (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:31:13 -0500
I am planning to try out the ICE 184A combination matching transformer and preamp that I bought several years ago. I have no dedicated RX antenna now. I understand that it might be wise to turn off t
/archives//html/Topband/2010-02/msg00114.html (6,865 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: VERTICAL SPACING (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 09:43:44 -0400
So true, but be sure to measure the self- and mutual-driving-point impedances to calculate network values that will produce equal currents at the phase angles you require. In my experience, not doing
/archives//html/Topband/2010-06/msg00025.html (7,319 bytes)

15. Topband: Dealing with the rotor on a driven tower (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:10:36 -0400
I spoke with Yaesu on this question and received the answer that the rotor must be insulated from any surface that carries RF to prevent "unexpected behavior" and/or damage to the rotor and/or contro
/archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00062.html (6,839 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Dealing with the rotor on a driven tower (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:48:04 -0400
Wow... thanks for the many and unanimous response: insulation is out, bypassing at the control box is in - if only for the sake of "good practice." That will save me a boatload of effort. -- 73 -- Br
/archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00067.html (8,736 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: double L antenna (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:07:36 -0400
Jorge, I have used this "bent vertical dipole" on an 80-ft tower for two seasons. The vertical portion in my case is only about 70-ft, with the bottom wire about 5-ft above the (very poor) ground. Us
/archives//html/Topband/2010-09/msg00099.html (8,264 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Boring Report - December (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:36:45 -0500
I found George's thoughts particularly interesting and reminiscent of the longstanding discussion around 10m in times of poor propagation. In that light, I thought it might be interesting to review c
/archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00027.html (9,150 bytes)

19. Topband: Fence "ground screen" instead of wire radials? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:05:41 -0400
Gang, I remember seeing an article on this subject recently, I think in QST or QEX, but I can't seem to track it down. The author used various numbers and lengths of wire fencing instead of a "conven
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00007.html (6,917 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Fence "ground screen" instead of wire radials? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Machesney <nekvtster@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 21:06:30 -0400
Thanks to NI0C for reminding me that this info was presented by NC0B, Rob Sherwood, at the Dayton antenna forum. It's available at www.nc0b.com. 73 -- Brian -- K1LI __________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00009.html (8,025 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu