Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:olinger@bellsouth.net: 438 ]

Total 438 documents matching your query.

201. Re: Topband: Hindering factors in the science of back yard 160m vertical inst... (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:27:17 -0400
The very best RBN comparisons are for an entire contest, between two stations in the same metro area, or same part of a state, in the same general geographic category. There is an RBN beta graph func
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00017.html (8,271 bytes)

202. Re: Topband: Hindering factors in the science of back yard 160m vertical ins (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:12:59 -0500
I'll have to counter that the two radial figures in your quoted RCA study are not about defining what goes wrong with minimalist and miscellaneous downward extrapolation of dense and uniform radial s
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00031.html (21,295 bytes)

203. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:58:09 -0500
This is only true to any degree if you are talking about buried, BARE radials. If also uniformly spaced, elevated or insulated radials make use of uniformity to achieve a degree of loss-avoiding fiel
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00060.html (7,542 bytes)

204. Re: Topband: Hindering factors in the science of back yard 160m vertical installations (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:32:23 -0500
Richard, With great respect and a smile and as much friendly courtesy as I can possibly muster via this infernally clueless medium of email. :>) I am quite jealous of the fingertip access you seem to
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00102.html (25,283 bytes)

205. Re: Topband: Hindering factors in the science of back yard 160m vertical installations (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:44:22 -0500
Much closer to the heart of it now... Interspersed. That's my question, and my answer that it does NOT. But many hams by references to these studies are incorrectly assured that a few on ground or bu
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00106.html (22,455 bytes)

206. Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:10:22 -0500
To see the RBN, go to http://reversebeacon.net/srch.php Type in N3ND, hit enter.  Look for the 160m spots around 03z 15 Nov. The 03z spots are at 400 watts. The 00z spots were at 100 watts, before t
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00116.html (7,928 bytes)

207. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:51:36 -0500
This antenna started out as a "U", but in trimming it back to resonance (folded counterpoise plus isolation transformer plus antenna length), the down part of the "U"s up, over and down got nearly el
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00124.html (10,750 bytes)

208. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:12:36 -0500
Hi Rick, We need to look at the current distribution and amplitudes on a 5/16 wave single wire folded counterpoise (FCP) quite carefully. It really is NOT the same as two loaded 1/16 wave radials. Th
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00128.html (17,086 bytes)

209. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:10:32 -0500
Hi, Richard, A bit of errata to correct my previous post: The difference in current will not be as large as I stated in my last post, because for the pair of 1/16 radials I did not divide the source
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00134.html (14,004 bytes)

210. Re: Topband: Another non-traditional antenna working. (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:11:41 -0500
Hi, Carl, I repeat, a folded counterpoise is NO substitute for a dense and uniform system, which is what you had in the end. My question for you is if you had a 70 x 10 foot strip of that rocky stuff
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00137.html (10,328 bytes)

211. Re: Topband: Bog wire (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:58:07 -0500
In places where you can't get an eight foot rod to go down, there are alternatives. A four foot rod, or driving the rod down at an oblique angle will add some resistance, but not enough to change muc
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00161.html (9,312 bytes)

212. Re: Topband: Daisey Chained ground rods (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:12:04 -0500
I'd ask the question differently. If you have "before" data, and can remeasure after you hook them together to get some "after" data, and you are trying to advance science, go for it. But otherwise b
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00162.html (8,994 bytes)

213. Re: Topband: Daisey Chained ground rods (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:00:44 -0500
Yeah, from the incoming signals. But common mode is an unwanted violation of the desired pattern. Anything not admitted by the shape of the beverage wire is an unwanted violation of the desired patte
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00173.html (9,529 bytes)

214. Re: Topband: Counterpoise very interresting (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:20:00 -0500
I found LB to be a little enigmatic. But so what? His forte' was modelling. He had all the professional licenses and did commercial modeling for some number of customers, including a lot of unheralde
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00206.html (10,001 bytes)

215. Re: Topband: no response to query: feeding phased verticals at half wave spacing (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:45:45 -0500
There is no single spacing for phased elements. There is a continuous variation of both spacing and phasing which has a gazillion outcomes. Two antennas spaced a halfwave apart and fed 180 degrees ou
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00214.html (10,443 bytes)

216. Re: Topband: Counterpoise very interresting (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:13:22 -0500
Models are very good in relative comparisons, with some very important caveats. 1) Hold everything possible constant between the two models, EXCEPT the singular issue(s) you are trying to trend. Don'
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00250.html (14,668 bytes)

217. Re: Topband: experimenting with inverted L (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:56:19 -0500
Carrying this line of thought to the business end of things, 12 ohms / 75 ohms = 16% of the voltage from your transmitted signal will be across the antenna and 84% of the voltage being dissipated in
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00304.html (10,687 bytes)

218. Re: Topband: My take on ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:28:33 -0500
It's pretty much demonstrated that there are a lot of people who are "tone deaf", that is, they simply cannot tell apart two tones of different frequencies if they are "somewhat" near to one another.
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00099.html (12,097 bytes)

219. Re: Topband: Evaluating RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:42:40 -0500
A reversible BOG does not work well because of the very lossy conductors laying on the ground. It can be done but you need to run a separate feedline to the opposite end and switch the feed circuitry
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00100.html (9,583 bytes)

220. Re: Topband: Best small space antennas (score: 1)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 20:57:20 -0500
Note: the following is not a theoretical or untested antenna. There are working antennas in the field using the folded counterpoise described below, scoring well in contests**, in use up to a year an
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00140.html (14,243 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu