Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:otterstad@enter.vg: 118 ]

Total 118 documents matching your query.

101. RE: Topband: CQ 160M CW Contest As Seen at S9SS (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:39:01 +0100
Hands down, the persistently most outstanding signal here during contest was that of UU7J. He was nearly always many db louder than any other signals, and I never head another one stronger at any tim
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00046.html (7,979 bytes)

102. RE: Topband: Topband like 20m in a contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:24:13 +0100
Hi Guys, I have been on Topbnad since 1997, firstly as ZS5K, then here in ZL. In those 8 years I have never heard Topband like it was last night - 63 in the log in total, starting with Herb, KV4FZ. J
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00148.html (7,418 bytes)

103. RE: Topband: 160M DXCC (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:22:39 +0100
Dear All I recall seeing a post here sometime ago regarding the numbering of DXCC Certificates for 160M. I was delighted today when I received my long awaited DXCC #1 for the Channel Islands (GU/GJ/G
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00171.html (8,398 bytes)

104. Re: Topband: TITANEX V160HD vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:24:24 +0100
I have one of these antennas in a windy hilltop location. It is guyed (as I don't have the courage to leave it up unguyed, as the spec suggests, in winds gusting up to 90 mph). I have had one up for
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00192.html (7,489 bytes)

105. Re: Topband: New Vertical performance (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:24:23 +0100
So I conclude the following - (1) either the conditions were great; (2) the new vertical is working well; or (3) both the above are true. The band was great. The only problem was keyclicks from VERY
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00206.html (7,440 bytes)

106. Re: Topband: New Vertical performance (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:57:35 +0100
After a very promising opening 12hrs before the start of the test, the band appeared to close right up for the 2 nights of the test itself. Only PJ2T and KV4FZ heard from here, and prop never went as
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00207.html (7,512 bytes)

107. Re: Topband: Aurora Info (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:42:41 +0100
Is there a web site were may I find the picture of the Aurora over NorthPole today at 10 gmt? also A & K Indexes? 73&acute;s de Javier yv5mbx _ yes, indeed. try : http://www.northern-lights.no/ 73 "
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00033.html (7,651 bytes)

108. Re: Topband: High and low angles (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:13:16 +0100
I have asked about this topic a couple times before....But for those of us whose horizon is blocked by surrounding mountains up to 15 to 20 degrees elevation angle, is it even worth the effort to put
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00052.html (7,821 bytes)

109. Re: Topband: SV5/ DJ7RJ last night (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 20:22:08 +0100
Propagation was interesting last night. There was moderate aurora. MODERATE ? My foot !!! 73 Rag LA5HE Most of EU was consistently weak here in Maine with two notable exceptions: RK6AXS was *very* lo
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00083.html (7,654 bytes)

110. Re: Topband: dx (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:11:30 +0100
Great to QSO Herb, KV4FZ, again..last 160m QSO nearly 35 years ago!!! Looking for NP4A for a new one. 73 Mike VK6HD _ He was 589 here last night - the best in a long time !! Now, if I also could work
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00158.html (6,662 bytes)

111. Re: Topband: Better low band conditions? (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:00:00 +0100
Tom, I have to agree with you. I can monitor aurora activity very well here (on VHF, 49 MHz) and this season the days WITHOUT aurora activity have been very very few. The scenario was the same last s
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00186.html (9,246 bytes)

112. Re: Topband: More not dead yet (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 06:55:16 +0200
I woke up early this morning in response to a call from mother nature and listened around. N7UA was 549 here while working a DL giving him 599 !! Anly a few east-coast stns were heard + PY2RO was wor
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00014.html (7,261 bytes)

113. Re: Topband: European openings (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:21:16 +0200
Bob Interesting comments like this would be immensely more useful if the time always was given in UTC, IMHO. 73 Rag LA5HE _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00039.html (7,213 bytes)

114. Re: Topband: Dxpedition Vertical ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 16:03:05 +0200
Given a small one or two man DXpedition to a tree-less location , what vertical antenna would be serviceable to install ? Not too difficult to transport , and survive big winds? top loaded, bottom lo
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00069.html (7,741 bytes)

115. Topband: Boring Report (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:08:55 +0200
DF2PY was heard working K9DX at 0428z - but really not strong enough to work. John was the only US stn I heard this morning 529 !! He was calling CQ but did not hear me or any other Eu stn. 73 rag LA
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00092.html (6,891 bytes)

116. Topband: -- 5B4AGC (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:36:25 +0200
the transmit antenna with S-8 QRN. 569 with very low QRN on the close to the ground Beverages. He worked many East coast stations. Top band is alive and active. He was somewhat heard in Oregon as wel
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00123.html (7,619 bytes)

117. Topband: OJ0 (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:24:38 +0200
OH2PM, Pertti, told me OJ0J will be QRV tonight on 160, along with 30 and 40 meters. Most likely 1821. I sure hope we have conditions here in NA as I missed W2GD crew when he went some 15+ years ago.
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00155.html (6,991 bytes)

118. Re: Topband: Experiences with inverted L (score: 1)
Author: "Ragnar Otterstad" <otterstad@enter.vg>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:51:03 +0200
35-40 say planning to some band an antenna Evan, as always - the proof of the pudding is in the eating ! At my Copenhagen QTH as OZ8RO I used the W1BB - inverted L, with about 25 meters vertical sec
/archives//html/Topband/2005-06/msg00013.html (8,786 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 118
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu