Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:pa5mw@home.nl: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Bad Top Band Frequencies in Europe (score: 1)
Author: "M. van Wijk" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:54:13 +0100
I'm listening almost every evening via a 2x22mtrs dipole @16mtrs. The only carriers I can hear is the OK0EV beacon on 1854Khz http://www.sweb.cz/ok0ev/main_uk.htm This one is QRX from 19:00 till 05:0
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00097.html (7,658 bytes)

2. S-meters; was ->Re: Topband: dynamic range (score: 1)
Author: "M. van Wijk" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:25:59 +0100
Exactly my point! What I DO care about is: 'how much louder is the signal compared to the background noise'. That is usually the info I supply/request. '73 Mark, PA5MW ______________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00108.html (8,672 bytes)

3. Topband: RX antenna on +200ft concrete buidling (score: 1)
Author: "M. van Wijk" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:32:58 +0100
Last friday we installed a 0.25 sloper from the 220ft high top corner of the bulding (Technical University of Eindhoven/PI4TUE) in direction USA. It worked superb at TX, each call was heard at the 1s
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00076.html (9,343 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: The "Contest" this past weekend (score: 1)
Author: "M. van Wijk" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:30:12 +0100
DL, F, I, PA, OZ, OK, OE, SP -- no Russians), .3 Africans (CN, EA8, EA9), one KH7 and one LU. Hello John, I worked you at the end of our gray line window. I had just disconnected the seperate 160 am
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00106.html (8,761 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: how to set up a Skype receiving beacon (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 22:12:33 +0100
Not presenting an opinion here, but a mere fact: Skype does not provide multicasting at automatic answering. In other words; only 1 listener can automatically connect the RX experiment of K3NA at a
/archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00068.html (9,250 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Did I miss the Era! (score: 1)
Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 8:38:30 +0200
Let's not forget the Belgium guy with his Lowband book and all those who did (and still do) contribute to it. There is a lot left to be explored, Enjoy ! '73 Mark, PA5MW _____________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00007.html (6,520 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Noise cancellers performance (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:40:56 +0200
Hello Petr, I have the DX-Engineering NCC-1 and compared it against my friends MFJ1026. The MFJ is more difficult to adjust and tricky. It has as no full 360 degreee coverage on the phase control kno
/archives//html/Topband/2008-09/msg00034.html (10,543 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: FW5RE and Topband (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:16:06 +0100
I'm hearing it too and am very ashamed for my 'fellow' europeans..... In this world of "I want everything and I want it by a mouse-click ONLY and I want it NOW", the DX-cluster spots are the start fo
/archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00047.html (7,188 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: FW5RE and Topband (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:04:28 +0100
Steve, I understand your sincere concerns. However, and this is a message to all hams: whenever there's a major dx-pedition going on, there's no guarantee you will succeed making a qso. Many hams see
/archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00049.html (10,114 bytes)

10. Topband: [Fwd: Re: QSB surfing] (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:51:08 +0100
_______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
/archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00073.html (6,654 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: QSB surfing (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:40:34 +0100
Hello Herb, I have encountered many similar occasions in contest where the station also had a 'difficult' call. In order to maintain their qso speed such stations would add a tiny space between the c
/archives//html/Topband/2009-02/msg00081.html (8,298 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Web SDR's and 'Cheating' (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:30:51 +0100
Hi Brendan, This all seems unethical. To me these are bogus QSO's. This is a radio hobby, not a professional business. If the radiocontact isn't possible, so be it. Better luck next time and perhaps
/archives//html/Topband/2011-02/msg00089.html (9,459 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: What do you use as a "RUN" Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:10:16 +0100
Diversity IS the way to go** But if you lack the capability, you need an additional RX antenna that covers more directions and/or vertical angles. In my 18x22ft large garden I use a Wellbrookloop on
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00006.html (8,723 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: What do you use as a "RUN" Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:04:01 +0100
ALA1530S+ However, It does need proper common mode filtering. And required secure detuning of my TX antenna to clear out re-radiated noise. 73 Mark, PA5MW ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00009.html (10,413 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: What do you use as a "RUN" Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:22:22 +0100
I forgot one more issue; being it an amplified wideband RX loop, it needed a 160m bandfilter on the output in my case. Too many -30dBm BC signals from MW and several SW bands. That lowered its noise
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00010.html (9,230 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Proper Decorum On The "Gentleman's Band"... (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:44:26 +0100
So, in these times of "I want it all at no effort", let's raise the bar. Create new thresholds, filters etc. at which only serious new ops will get through. Close all DX clusters for Topband; yeah ha
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00091.html (8,943 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:04:04 +0100
It is time to stop talking. This topic pops up every six months or so for many years now. Go to a defined and mutual agreed property and build / test all mentioned radial models. No need to keep thro
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00126.html (9,593 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Radials help (Mark van Wijk) (score: 1)
Author: Mark van Wijk <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:06:02 +0100
Please do not abuse my wording. Or maybe I need to clarify. I DO welcome any discussion on exsting and new proposed antenna/ground systems. However, discussions tend to be jammed by people throwing i
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00173.html (8,373 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:56:05 +0200
Hi Dave, Can you please elaborate a bit more on your 2m dia 160m loop? 73 Mark, PA5MW _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00067.html (7,268 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: "New beverage" (score: 1)
Author: "PA5MW, Mark" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 09:10:28 +0200
I find the center/off-center feedpoint very attractive for those of us cramped in between on a city lot. You can hide a BOG-like coax along the neighbors property lines for 200 to 500 ft in two direc
/archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00097.html (10,494 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu