Mail Archive Search: <+from:paul@n1bug.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:paul@n1bug.net: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Beverage Ant question (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:14:47 -0400; I am no expert on such matters but can offer a comment based on my own experience: I have several 500 to 600 foot Beverages in different directions. They are in a low-lying area alongside a river th; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00244.html (7,261 bytes)
42. Re: Topband: CQ WW Contest (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:31:19 -0500; It is often very difficult to work EU during the SSB contests even from here in the northeast. Many EU's who were S9+ this weekend could not be worked. I think it's more a question of QRM/splatter ov; /archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00333.html (7,850 bytes)
43. Re: Topband: An Admission (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 16:38:24 -0500; I apologize if this is getting too far off topic. This will be my one and only post on this subject. I don't make a practice of it but I have done it a couple of times for a different reason. For exa; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00110.html (8,904 bytes)
44. Re: Topband: Self Spotting and Icebergs (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:03:08 -0500; Interesting. Possibly it's not always a case of those stations trying to falsely claim a QSO? I had a distressing thing happen last season... I was in a pile calling A45XR, not altogether successfull; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00136.html (7,398 bytes)
45. Re: Topband: Technology "QSO's" (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>(by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:32:40 -0500; *Many* VHF folks, and it is part of the reason I gave up and came back to top band. Too many "QSOs" involve some RF being sprayed into space along with minute by minute two-way internet/cluster exch; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00154.html (9,402 bytes)
46. Topband: Update: RFI to DSL modem (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:48:03 -0500; Several people asked for a summary of my findings, so here it is. My DSL modem reports S/N 30 dB so I have a reasonable DSL signal. 50 watts on 160m causes the modem to lose sync. I have tried the fo; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00262.html (7,765 bytes)
47. Topband: condx (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:35:40 -0500; After several weeks of very poor conditions, last night was much better but somewhat unusual. I got 4 new ones in the log! Signals appeared to be arriving at high angle. For the first time this seaso; /archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00322.html (7,280 bytes)
48. Re: Topband: ARRL (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:37:25 -0500; I have to disagree, in part. Here in the northeast, on good propagation nights there is often a DX station every few hundred hertz from 1810 up to wherever the SSB totally takes over. Inevitably on; /archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00049.html (7,527 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 48
Page: [1] [2] [3]