- 1. RE: Topband: TRANSCEIVER WITH SEPERATE RECEIVER? (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:08:08 -0500
- Many of the new model transceivers are now coming with two complete receivers just for this purpose, I have the Orion, and it has such a capability, with two Receivers, 3 antenna inputs and multiple
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00067.html (10,053 bytes)
- 2. RE: Topband: Adding radials, a question (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:34:20 -0500
- Hi Dave, While I am no expert on the issue of radials, There are many good articals, I've found some of the best about vertical theory in dealing with the Butternutt Verticals. http://www.bencher.com
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-09/msg00005.html (11,170 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Adding radials, a question (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 22:56:42 -0500
- Thank you for your reply True any thing directly from a vendor is suspect, but when it resounds so directly to vertical theory, then it should be respected. Although I do not claim to be an expert, I
- /archives//html/Topband/2004-09/msg00009.html (10,184 bytes)
- 4. RE: Topband: Re: Need antenna help on 160 and 80 meters ( new Dxer ) (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:48:09 -0600
- The HF2V and HF9V are pretty much the same in the 80M and 160M design, Any good vertical needs alot of radials, I have 40 of them 30 feet long, I've done well on 80M DX mostly using full leagal limit
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00018.html (8,575 bytes)
- 5. RE: Topband: CONTEST OBSERVATION (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:49:13 -0600
- I'll second that, Had to use the 857D last weekend also as my orion was in for a check up, Agree with everything said, For going on a trip or mobile, just fine, (which is what I use it for), for cont
- /archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00019.html (7,276 bytes)
- 6. Topband: Topbanders on in China (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:08:25 -0500
- Hello topbanders, Our team in Beijing will be on 160M for the CQWW 2007 SSB contest at the end of October. We will be putting up a vertical and a K9AY Loop to work during the contest, I don't think w
- /archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00040.html (7,872 bytes)
- 7. Topband: MFJ-259 Antenna Analyzer (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Detweiler <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:25:16 -0600
- Without the frequency display you won't know what frequency the SWR dip is on. The earlier model of the 259 (not B, the one with the two buttons on top for input & gate ) did not really find the reso
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00012.html (7,302 bytes)
- 8. Re: Topband: coax change? (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Detweiler <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:56:29 -0600
- I would not think you could really notice a difference in DB at HF. the LMR 400 is a good bet, High velocity, low loss. I've seen this surplus for much less than the going retail rate. Another benifi
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00187.html (10,425 bytes)
- 9. Re: Topband: LY2ZZ QSL (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Detweiler <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:04:50 -0500
- I have heard LY2ZZ is often on the county hunters net 14.336. You might try to ask net control, usualy KZ2P, to contact him and move off frequency for a QSO. Best Wishes Richard K5SF ________________
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-08/msg00051.html (8,052 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu