- 1. [TowerTalk] Civilized behavior (score: 1)
- Author: "EUGENE SMAR" <spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:24:16 -0500
- Gents: Yesterday I subscribed to the ARRL-802.11B (similar to commercial Wi-Fi wireless Internet access but in the Amateur 2.4 GHz band) reflector. I've received several postings since then. However,
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-03/msg00075.html (7,068 bytes)
- 2. Topband: FYI (score: 1)
- Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:44:11 -0500
- Gents: Is this another way of saying, MW signals will be attenuated when propagating through auroral zones; hence, residual skewed-path signal energy, that would ordinarily remain undetected vs a mor
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00096.html (6,963 bytes)
- 3. Topband: Sunrise/Sunset calculator (score: 1)
- Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 23:21:06 -0500
- Gents: I found this site http://www.sunrisesunset.com/ among many under a Yahoo! search of the 'Net. After clicking into the pages a few times I was able to produce a couple of single-page calendar m
- /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00153.html (6,837 bytes)
- 4. Topband: matching an inverted-L (score: 1)
- Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 15:54:01 -0500
- Steve: I use a largish air variable capacitor to feed my inverted L on 160M. Not sure of the actual cap value, but it's a lot easier to tune using this than a boxful of fixed values. Plus the air var
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00024.html (7,805 bytes)
- 5. Topband: matching an inverted-L (score: 1)
- Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 06:08:28 -0500
- Bruce: I think the term "Largish" is mine. By that I mean an air variable capacitor that looks like it came from a linear amp or high-power tuner. Usually these kinds of caps are more than two or thr
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00032.html (9,220 bytes)
- 6. Topband: Ground Rod at Radial Junction point (score: 1)
- Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
- Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 21:26:04 -0500
- Frank: I use the data stream found around 1.953 +/- MHz or W1AW code practice at 1.818 MHz as a signal source for A/B/C comparisons on my 160M antennas (L, shunt-fed tower, and 80M sloper.) Why not d
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00120.html (8,745 bytes)
- 7. Topband: RX mods for '746 PRO (score: 1)
- Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 13:59:36 -0400
- Gents: Has anyone been able to modify an IC-746 PRO to accept RX-only antennas? I've seen such mods for earlier Icom rigs but am hesistant about running headlong into doing this on an as-new '46 PRO
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00034.html (6,487 bytes)
- 8. Topband: front end protection (score: 1)
- Author: spelunk.sueno@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 23:22:14 -0400
- Folks: Wolf's idea sounds like it would make a good product (Are you listening, Gary KD9SV?) Merely switch the RX-only antennas during receive by using the rig's SEND line, or equivalent. Disable the
- /archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00091.html (9,150 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu