Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:telegrapher9@gmail.com: 191 ]

Total 191 documents matching your query.

121. Re: Topband: Converting a full-size G5RV to a T for 160m (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 07:36:08 -0700
When using a G5RV as a T-antenna the balun at the ladder line to coax transition should be removed. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.co
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00304.html (7,168 bytes)

122. Re: Topband: Inverted L SWR Jumps ??? (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:56:05 -0700
W8JI solved another problem and saved someone much time and frustration. I'd like to thank Tom for the great help and knowledge he has imparted in me and many, many others over the years. In my exper
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00443.html (10,410 bytes)

123. Re: Topband: Detuning shunt fed towers (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:30:01 -0700
A UHF connector won't flash over at 1500 watts if the VSWR is low. _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00470.html (8,755 bytes)

124. Re: Topband: November 30-December 2 -- ARRL 160 Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:41:49 -0700
To me each of the three 160 meter contests has its unique charm. The Stew Perry 'test tends to level the playing field. The 15 hour operating limit is easier on the mind and body. *I would LOVE to se
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00497.html (9,238 bytes)

125. Re: Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:19:43 -0700
N6VW reports driving 5 watts into his apartment plumbing against the AC system ground and making a couples dozen QSOs in the 'test. _______________________________________________ Topband reflector -
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00077.html (10,218 bytes)

126. Re: Topband: QRP/Poor antenna stations ARRL160 (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 19:38:39 -0700
Carl, Tree and all the rest I find it fascinating how just about any piece of random metal and low power will yield top band contacts. For the Stew Perry I propose an award for *"lamest antenna*" or
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00094.html (7,828 bytes)

127. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 06:06:08 -0700
A way to bring back the DX Window is to not work US stations who call CQ in the window. Boycott them if you will. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00159.html (8,110 bytes)

128. Re: Topband: Shunt fed towers and common mode chokes (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:56:58 -0700
Google G3TXQ COMMON-MODE _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00221.html (8,776 bytes)

129. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:13:54 -0700
20 dB implies that the ground system loss is 10X the inverted-L radiation resistance. This would result in an input resistance of 250 ohms and a minimum VSWR if 5:1. I don't think that is what the re
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00328.html (15,133 bytes)

130. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:17:18 -0700
Correction, 100X the loss. The deal difference between a single ground rod and a BC station ground will be about 6 dB. _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topband@cont
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00329.html (16,179 bytes)

131. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:13:40 -0700
Guy, you make it sound like magic. See the IEEE paper RADIATION EFFICIENCY AND INPUT IMPEDANCE OF MONOPOLE ELEMENTS WITH RADIAL-WIRE GROUND PLANES IN PROXIMITY TO EARTH ______________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00333.html (19,156 bytes)

132. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:10:33 -0700
Guy, here is where I believe your mysterious extra "loss" in NEC is coming from. You are reading the "average gain" loss. NEC calculates that by integrating the power at infinity and dividing by the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00339.html (24,020 bytes)

133. Re: Topband: Antennas (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:52:11 -0700
Some of us have little choice for low band antennas. I am currently using a Tarheel 200A screwdriver antenna with a 24' whip in an HOA neighborhood. That gives me a 30' base loaded vertical over 90 r
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00345.html (7,028 bytes)

134. Re: Topband: raised radials (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 08:46:06 -0700
That is quite an improvement. I had to have dropped the base impedance from 400 ohms to 40 ohms for it to do that. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ Topband reflector - topban
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00399.html (9,256 bytes)

135. Re: Topband: Optimal radial wire type and gauge? (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 08:49:38 -0700
Read the N6LF radial papers and you will see that 1/8 wavelength radials are about as good as one can do. I use #14 stranded copper THHN wire because it is easy to work with. But how good can we get?
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00400.html (7,547 bytes)

136. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 08:59:27 -0700
Mike that QTH looks alot like the Great Salt Lake of Utah where I have operated a few 160 meter 'tests running a balloon vertical. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ Topband re
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00401.html (12,116 bytes)

137. Re: Topband: GAP Vertical Question (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:45:20 -0700
Don, a 36" helium balloon filled to 32" is enough to lift 130' of #26 wire in no wind. It doesn't take much wind to blow it horizontal. A half wave vertical suffers more as it is blown down so I thin
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00414.html (8,738 bytes)

138. Re: Topband: Fw: raised radials (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:59:33 -0700
The 10 dB, or was it 20 dB, claim could be a case of "belief preservation" as described in section 3.5 of the paper *Teaching Critical Thinking: Lessons for Cognitive Science*, by Tim van Gelder http
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00441.html (7,073 bytes)

139. Re: Topband: Optimal radial wire type and gauge? (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:06:12 -0700
Tom, I think you are extrapolating one case with a particular radial length to all vertical antenna ground systems. The N6LF radial papers detail his NEC-4 simulations and measurements of vertical an
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00442.html (10,603 bytes)

140. Re: Topband: GAP Vertical Question (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 06:12:53 -0700
*Half wavelength vertical ground loss* Let's see if we can quantify the conduction losses of a 1.8 MHz half wavelength vertical connected to average earth via a ground rod. This paper by N6LF shows o
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00459.html (16,307 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu