Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:telegrapher9@gmail.com: 191 ]

Total 191 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: Home Depot LED bulb interference. (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 06:45:16 -0600
LED lighting has the potential to become the main MF/HF noise source for us. FCC *radiated noise* limit testing can produce much lower measured levels than some consumer installations. The driver for
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00045.html (8,937 bytes)

82. Topband: Fwd: Re: Home Depot LED bulb interference. (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:43:40 -0600
LED lamps no doubt comply with FCC conducted emissions. The noise is almost entirely differential mode. Think of a signal on an open wire t-line; it does not radiate (much). But, the asymmetry in the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00052.html (11,173 bytes)

83. Re: Topband: Fwd: Re: Home Depot LED bulb interference. (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:24:25 -0600
My calculations assume that the LED lamp conducted emissions are at the FCC limit at a single frequency in the 160 meter band. This is not real world. I'll buy a lamp and characterize the conducted e
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00054.html (12,515 bytes)

84. Re: Topband: Home Depot LED bulb interference. (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:42:42 -0600
I did some research and Maxim makes ICs for offline LED lamps such as the Home Depot lamps. The switching frequency is 50 to 330 kHz and the incoporate frequency dithering to reduce EMI. The standard
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00055.html (12,740 bytes)

85. Re: Topband: 'the old ways...' (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:01:18 -0600
_______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00022.html (8,948 bytes)

86. Topband: Fwd: Re: 'the old ways...' (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:01:18 -0600
Dan that is how I do it and have measured the base referred ground loss resistance of my 30' vertical to be around 5 ohms. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QS
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00023.html (8,396 bytes)

87. Re: Topband: question about antenna bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 16:37:28 -0600
Roy, you didn't specify the vertical length of your inverted-L but I'll assume it is 50' and that your base-referred ground loss is 5 ohms. Using NEC-2 for the 1/4 wavelength inverted-L I get a 2:1 V
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00084.html (8,864 bytes)

88. Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 05:54:07 -0600
The program W6ELProp gives the take-off-angle needed for any path. Looking at 80 meter paths (it does 801-0 meters) the angles for DX paths are in the range of 3-15 degrees. Dave WX7G _______________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00109.html (8,953 bytes)

89. Re: Topband: Monopole Radiation Patterns, takeoff angles etc (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 09:58:00 -0600
If the radiation at 3 degrees is -8.9 dB relative to the maximum amplitude we can still work DX. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00118.html (9,830 bytes)

90. Re: Topband: radial wire source (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 10:08:26 -0600
I use #14 stranded THHN wire from Home Despot because it's easy work work with. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00037.html (9,802 bytes)

91. Re: Topband: Reducing Noise in the Shack (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:59:39 -0600
The W7NQN line filter is a differential-mode filter. You need a filter that is designed for common-mode filtering. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw?
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00192.html (9,824 bytes)

92. Re: Topband: Reducing Noise in the Shack (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:28:06 -0600
I don't like diff mode only filters because they have diff mode to common mode conversion due to component tolerance. I don't see a fuse in the NQN filter and it us rated for only 7 amps. To be used
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00198.html (8,862 bytes)

93. Re: Topband: Cable shields (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:45:17 -0600
Tom, I don't doubt that you performed the cable TI measurement correctly but I have seen folks take data that is actually the TI of the test fixture and not the cables under test. What TI impedance d
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00133.html (7,977 bytes)

94. Re: Topband: Choke Construction Info Needed (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:35:17 -0600
20 uH should be sufficient at the base of a 1/4 wave length vertical. Such an inductor can be close-wound with insulated #4 wire, diameter 8", 8 turns. It should survive intact except for the insulat
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00348.html (9,600 bytes)

95. Re: Topband: Choke Construction Info Needed (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:00:15 -0600
30 watts is correct for 1500 watts in a 50 ohm system and a coil Q of 226. The power loss is 0.1 dB and the coil temp rise is around 20 deg C. _______________________________________________ UR RST I
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00351.html (11,970 bytes)

96. Re: Topband: Choke Construction Info Needed (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:35:45 -0600
My mistake. Now then, for lighting we don't really want much inductance between the antenna and ground. For a 100 kA strike rising in 2 us 1 MV is developed across 20 uH. Instead we want a sturdy spa
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00356.html (9,275 bytes)

97. Re: Topband: Fw: Choke Construction Info Needed (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:24:32 -0600
I agree with Tom and Bob that the big, heavy choke is not needed. Even it offers too much inductance to be an effective lightning path. A spark gap is the thing to use across the choke or shorted 90
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00358.html (9,864 bytes)

98. Re: Topband: Spark gaps (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:35:13 -0600
Yes a direct hit should vaporize a spark plug. For a 100 kA hit two 1" diameter rounded steel balls may survive. Note that Ross Engineering uses carbon balls on their spark gaps. At 50 kA/us every in
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00361.html (9,187 bytes)

99. Re: Topband: Lightning protection (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:36:03 -0600
A low impedance tower ground is important. Google TOWER FOOTING RESISTANCE for an IEEE ppt. on this. I would aim for a couple of ohms. That means several long rods. __________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00366.html (8,267 bytes)

100. Re: Topband: Spark gaps (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:39:43 -0600
Google "carbon ball gap lightning." _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00367.html (9,892 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu