Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tshoppa@wmata.com: 122 ]

Total 122 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Not so Boring report (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 20:18:38 +0000
Tree, We are at a sunspot maximum? 10M sure as heck didn't get the memo. There was a whole bunch more DX on 160 last nite than on 10 today! And that's fine by me! Tim N3QE Hi all. Until a few nights
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00261.html (7,966 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: Ground mounted 1/2 and 1/4 wave verticals (was GAP) (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:21:33 +0000
Dave... would it be a fair extrapolation to take your last sentence, and draw the conclusion that if adding radials changes feed impedance, then there was actual ground loss in the near field? Or tha
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00478.html (10,801 bytes)

43. Topband: Why the DX doesn't always work split? Especially low bands. (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 03:19:09 +0000
Last night and tonight there were several 80M stations, and one 160M station, that were in big demand in North America and I guess worldwide, given who they were coming back to. The callers were all
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00489.html (8,568 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: Why the DX doesn't always work split? Especially low bands. (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:44:22 +0000
Thanks for the insight guys. I know the DX is far more experienced than me, and I think I gained some insight into what they must be hearing on their end on the low bands. Earlier this fall (first we
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00499.html (8,649 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: ARRL LOTW and More (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:07 +0000
Zone 5 advantage? Top LP scores in ARRL 160 are consistently from the midwest (Zone 4). Tim N3QE ________________________________________ From: Topband [topband-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of J
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00512.html (9,609 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: Delta loops antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:54:24 +0000
On the "doublet" vs "dipole": at various times in history, the word "dipole" was taken by some to mean "quarter wave dipole", and doublet was a more general term for a balanced antenna. I will look i
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00541.html (8,787 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: Lab style comparison results on 160m small lot antenna changes. (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:49:04 +0000
"Trust but verify". As with SPICE or any other simulation program... garbage in, garbage out. An experienced antenna modeler knows what assumptions are good to make because of past verifications of r
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00557.html (9,226 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: condx last night (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:36:39 +0000
Just to show how good it was... I called CQ on 160M circa 0120Z, and IMMEDIATELY was spotted by many (most? All?) reversebeacon skimmers in Europe. That is unusual for a pipsqueak like me, sometimes
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00575.html (9,318 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: Needed: Rule of Thumb (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:54:16 +0000
If it is 5 feet high and 50 feet away... I would consider the fence to be a minor enhancement in ground conductivity 50 feet out :-). I don't think it's at all obvious that you need to move it. Tim N
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00601.html (7,845 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: 160 vert puzzle (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:56:44 +0000
Is this all being done with the portable "antenna analyzers"? Those can be surprisingly susceptible to nearby BCB stations that are out of ham bands, but detected by the analyzer and influencing the
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00058.html (7,669 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: solarwind and 160 prop (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:02:00 +0000
I have a hard time differentiating between "low activity" and "poor DX conditions" sometimes. Tim N3QE _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00167.html (7,837 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:23:40 +0000
I didn't notice the keyclicks so bad, but what did bother me was one local who had an incredible amount of (?) phase noise (it was keyed broadband noise plus whiny synth noise) up and down from his v
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00222.html (7,723 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: RX/TX Antenna switching (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:02:49 +0000
I find it ironic that when I was a kid we all built T/R switches to use a single antenna with our separate Transmitter and Receiver. Today we build a switch to use two antennas to interface with our
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00240.html (10,749 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: Coupla things (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:55:23 +0000
Bob (K6NV) and I were having a off-list discussion and it got me wondering.... I heard some bad signals on the east coast here, but nothing memorable that I would describe as having keyclicks. I thin
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00246.html (9,340 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: CQ 160 Contest _ updated (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:17:37 +0000
The reason we have split on 40M is only lack of a coordinated band plan between EU and W/VE. It is far and away not a desirable situation. I have been a ham who regards 40M as his home stomping groun
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00256.html (11,717 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:56:27 +0000
Out of curiosity... with so many narrow-pattern receive antenna configs, how do typical contest stations check different directions after a CQ? Frank, I still want to come visit your station during a
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00028.html (11,691 bytes)

57. Re: Topband: Webinar - The first Top Band DX Contest â?" the 1921 Transatlantic Test (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:24:07 +0000
I had the opportunity to travel around China a lot last summer and saw many caged T-top or cage dipole antennas. Maybe they were cage dipoles, hard to tell from the distance I was at (typically I sig
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00163.html (8,483 bytes)

58. Re: Topband: How does KP4KE do it with 20 watts? (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:10:47 +0000
I find no record of KP4KE in my CW logs or in reversebeacon data. ??? I'm guessing he's phone-only. Is this summary for CQ 160M phone or what? As to killer loud signals... TX5K (Clipperton) was comin
/archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00025.html (9,562 bytes)

59. Re: Topband: Antenna terminations (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:45:12 +0000
Heat shrink squeezes resistor. Squeezing a carbon composition resistor will decrease its resistance. Film and ceramic resistors much less affected. Remember when we were kids and played with telephon
/archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00099.html (7,899 bytes)

60. Re: Topband: Using GE silicone as antenna sealant. (score: 1)
Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:25:54 +0000
After several less than satisfactory experiences with various outdoor sealed boxes and junctions etc. I have had my ladder line, transmit antenna, and all junctions completely exposed to the weather
/archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00119.html (9,970 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu